Can't be giving away the performance secrets..Show us a photo of the inside of your latest version. Or do you not have pride in your handiwork?
Can't be giving away the performance secrets..Show us a photo of the inside of your latest version. Or do you not have pride in your handiwork?
Thank you for this correction. I modified the review title and the text.
How come there is no way for an owner to know what the are buying? For this kind of money, you could not afford some label/printing on the unit to indicate the model? Since you admonish people from opening the unit, it seems that a model designation would be mandatory.
You are jumping from battery to device. LiFePO4 like other lithium chemistries has exceptionally low internal impedance. Here is the spec:LiFePO4 batteries cannot catch fire even if a nail is driven through them (easy to research as battery chemistry was printed on all batteries in the pics) & device is NOT a fire hazard
They would know what they ordered, how would they know if they got old or new units when they receive it?To be honest amirm, you can't be surely suggesting that at the time of purchase, the customer didn't know what model they where purchased at the time, of course this would have helped your review to be more accurate, you could have ask JK to confirm this. But choose not to.
I cannot agree more, with that.The best answer to this thread is to send in the latest versions with the manufacturers blessing for full testing and tear down.
If there's pride and confidence in their products I don't see how this would not be embraced.
I want to ask this in a formal way even though I know the answer:This particular DAC measured is an old device, probably 5-7 years old (could be older - I would only know this if I knew the original buyer) - an older design called JKDAC not ISO-DAC
That quote is not from the user guide for the DAC model being measured - it might be more reasonable to evaluate some of your earlier statements/decisions based on the information/context provided by me?Because of this answer I already provided: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/ciúnas-dac-usb-dac-review.9788/post-263360
From the manual once more: ""It needs a 5V supply through it's charging socket at all times except when the unit is put into storage."
Draining a Lithium battery to zero can almost destroy them. There is no battery management system (BMS) here to shut the unit down prior to the batteries draining to zero so I don't want to chance it.
I don't remember how I tested the Mojo but that device like many other well designed units, has proper battery management system and is designed to run on batteries.
Can you deal with my bullet points in my first post, correct your misunderstanding/mistatements & do some relevant measurements to prove your objectivity in doing such measurements before asking me, in such a contentious manner, to supply a DAC for review?I want to ask this in a formal way even though I know the answer:
Would you please send one of your latest models for review and testing?
It absolutely is. I typed it word by word from the paper manual that came with it.That quote is not from the user guide for the DAC model being measured
They would know what they ordered, how would they know if they got old or new units when they receive it/QUOTE)
it's called customer service, something that JK has a great record on. I agree with some ID on it, but l don't for one second think that JK would supply a unit that is old, when you have purchased the latest version.
Or are you suggesting that?
I can only test what people give me. What is the right power supply and what difference would it make in the measurements? Can you point me to the right power supply so I can purchase and test with that?The person who supplied the DAC supplied the SMPS of unknown quality - I didn't supply this SMPS (this could easily have been checked with the person who supplied the DAC)
Sorry but this is isn't correct - I only provide an online user guide not a paper manual - the other DAC owners that have posted here can confirm this.It absolutely is. I typed it word by word from the paper manual that came with it.
I have addressed them all now.Can you deal with my bullet points in my first post, correct your misunderstanding/mistatements & do some relevant measurements to prove your objectivity in doing such measurements before asking me, in such a contentious manner, to supply a DAC for review?
The solution is in your hands to measure it when powered from battery alone after charging it with the user provided SMPS.I can only test what people give me. What is the right power supply and what difference would it make in the measurements? Can you point me to the right power supply so I can purchase and test with that?
I think in this instance, falling back on, l didn't know, is poor. lt was requested you speak to JK, you choose not too, and its its only that he has replied you are getting involved. You could have privately emailed him, thats what professional people tend to do in my experience.I can only test what people give me. What is the right power supply and what difference would it make in the measurements? Can you point me to the right power supply so I can purchase and test with that?
I have addressed them all now.
1. I changed the title and text of the review. - I edited my post which you may not have seen, it is a DAC model called JKDAC
2. Your assessment that this is not a fire hazard is completely wrong. I have provided full explanation of it. - you are wrong & I have told you why both the case is isolated & the batteries are safe chemistry (which you stated too) not to mention that the many devices in the field for the last 10 years or so demonstrate your error
3. The manual specifically says not to run it on battery. Since draining the battery to zero irreparably damages the cell, and the battery is not replaceable, I don't know how you expect anyone to run this on battery anyway. - you choose to ignore what I told you - that the manual you are working from is not the correct one for the device - you are still claiming it is the correct manual?
Just everything but heyho4. On it not being an ISO DAC, I went on your website multiple times and the only products I could find there was ISO DACs which looked identical to this unit. I also asked the owner what the designation was and he didn't know. - so the owner didn't buy it directly from me which is what I gleaned from the whole uninformed nature of this 'review'
This is exactly the same situation as the previous DAC you had from an ebay user & I could tell you the whole story about this person
Anything else I have left out?
This is the printed pages as supplied to me:Sorry but this is isn't correct - I only provide an online user guide not a paper manual - the other DAC owners that have posted here can confirm this.
Maybe the user printed off some manual & provided it to you, did you ask him?
So that manual I just showed you is not for this unit where it calls is Ciunas DAC? Where is the manual for that?This particular DAC measured is an old device, probably 5-7 years old (could be older - I would only know this if I knew the original buyer) - an older design called JKDAC not ISO-DAC