That and one of your large horns! Which almost brings us back to the original topic of the Jubilee.I've measured the Klipschorn. Not very even and a speaker that would greatly benefit from DSP/EQ and going active.
The Klipschorn will never match the M2 on paper, but that doesn't mean that it can't be even more engaging for some listeners. There is something to be said for the dynamics of an all horn system. Oh well, so far we still can't have it all.I'm not sure it could ever match the quality of the M2's horn and compression driver section though.
For sure! That's the reason I kept and tweaked my La Scala's for 32 years and the only reasonThe Klipschorn will never match the M2 on paper, but that doesn't mean that it can't be even more engaging for some listeners. There is something to be said for the dynamics of an all horn system.
Good question but how does one measure the horizontal directvity accurately of a horn that is placed in the corners and uses the walls to lengthen the horn? You would actually have to rotate the room! And placing it any other way, beats the purpose of the design. Vertically it could be measured though.Does anyone know the radiation pattern of the horn and tweeter of the Klipschorn ? I have a pair myself, never used them because I am making the new home , but i am curious about their horn coverage, as might be useful for my room . Ibought the old Klipschorn 1.5 year ago and finally i will use them, you can't imagine how excited i am)
But doesn't that only apply to the bass range? Radiation pattern for the mid and tweeter horns could be measured, no?Good question but how does one measure the horizontal directvity accurately of a horn that is placed in the corners and uses the walls to lengthen the horn? You would actually have to rotate the room!
It has especially low modulation distortion, although the THD is low also. At 105 dB SPL, one result, which I think came from reading the IM distortion graph in Heyser's Audio magazine (1986), was 1.75%. I can't find my copy, but anyone having it can look at the distance from the Klipschorn that measurement was taken. For comparison purposes two smaller, direct radiating speakers from those days at 105 dB were 7% modulation distortion (Platinum Studio 2) and 10% modulation distortion (Fried Studio 4). The THD of the Klipschorn @ 105 dB was 0.25%.Klipschorn has horn loaded woofer and M2 has a front firing woofer. In regards to distortion and dynamics, the Klipschorn is better in that particular area.
Constant directivity in the bass can't be achieved in rooms of this size. The room modes will dominate no matter what. But corner placement minimizes boundary effect and it picks up SPL, as much as 9 dB in certain frequencies.But doesn't that only apply to the bass range? Radiation pattern for the mid and tweeter horns could be measured, no?
More of a question that anything, your the expert here.
For dynamics that is at insane SPL levels only right? In terms of specs the Jubilee has 2dB max SPL over the M2 with 125dB vs 123dB. And to be fair, the M2 has a matching 18" subwoofer for when you want more low-end power. Considering the M2 is half the price you should compare it to the M2 together with the SUB18.Klipschorn has horn loaded woofer and M2 has a front firing woofer. In regards to distortion and dynamics, the Klipschorn is better in that particular area.
It's not the SPL that's so much of interest for home use, it's the lower distortion. And that's very audible. Front firing can't keep up with horn loading, unless you add about three times the drivers.For dynamics that is at insane SPL levels only right? In terms of specs the Jubilee has 2dB max SPL over the M2 with 125dB vs 123dB. And to be fair, the M2 has a matching 18" subwoofer for when you want more low-end power. Considering the M2 is half the price you should compare it to the M2 together with the SUB18.
So dual 12" horns beat a single 18" in terms of distortion?It's not the SPL that's so much of interest for home use, it's the lower distortion. And that's very audible. Front firing can't keep up with horn loading, unless you add about three times the drivers.
Directivity control also comes in the picture, but will depend on the type of horn. There'a a reason why we using such a large midbass horn you see below.
View attachment 251303
View attachment 251304
Yes. Using a 18" as high as needed in most horns wouldn't be a good idea by the way.So dual 12" horns beat a single 18" in terms of distortion?
So a 15" has high and noticeable distortion in the, lets say, 60hz to 800hz range (800hz is the crossover to the horn in the M2)? Because that 18" sub would be playing the <60hz content, an area where it also has more distortion that dual horn loaded 12" woofers?Yes. Using a 18" as high as needed in most horns wouldn't be a good idea by the way.
I'm speaking in general terms. Horn loading a driver minimizes distortion and the horn can add directivity control. Front firing can't compete here as distortion is higher and there's a loss of directvity. I can't go into a discussion with all various scenarious though. One can obviously add subwoofer(s) to Klipschorn as well but it would take something with very high SPL and low distortion to keep up with it.So a 15" has high and noticeable distortion in the, lets say, 60hz to 800hz range (800hz is the crossover to the horn in the M2)? Because that 18" sub would be playing the <60hz content, an area where it also has more distortion that dual horn loaded 12" woofers?
A older review of the Klipshorn from Audio magazine in 1986 with measurements. Better scans may be available elsewhere.Does anyone know the radiation pattern of the horn and tweeter of the Klipschorn ? I have a pair myself, never used them because I am making the new home , but i am curious about their horn coverage, as might be useful for my room . Ibought the old Klipschorn 1.5 year ago and finally i will use them, you can't imagine how excited i am)
Awesome, thanks for posting. I had a copy of the magazine I had saved since 86 but I looked everyA older review of the Klipshorn from Audio magazine in 1986 with measurements. Better scans may be available elsewhere.
A older review of the Klipshorn from Audio magazine in 1986 with measurements. Better scans may be available elsewhere.
Awesome, thanks for posting. I had a copy of the magazine I had saved since 86 but I looked every
where and can't find it.