Okay after reading and thinking about it, I'm just not sure I want a subwoofer or even two of them for that matter. Plus I don't have the room for them, I very much dislike clutter and I've seen people setup before all lined up against the wall and I don't like that look, plus it's more complicated. Also I'm not a bass head. But I do agree I need more bass than what a 6.5" bookshelf's can give me.
One thing I've learned is that I need more clean room filling sound I want something that will play clean up to 80-85 instead of only about 76db and 6.5" bookshelf isn't cutting it. Many have suggested I need to get bigger speakers and keep the AVR, or at least get bigger speakers first and then see. Obviously I need to go with tower speakers or bigger bookshelves that have 8" woofers. I want to be blown away but not overkill. So if you think any of the following speakers are too big for my living room or there not a good match for someone sitting only 9 feet away let me know. Specs for my living room area is in my post #83. The thing is if I do as some of you want and just get subs and keep my 6.5" elacs what if then I'm still not satisfied somehow and I'm up still buying bigger speakers and that those new bigger speakers don't need a sub and I've already have the subs I'll be pissed. I don't want to continue rebuying stuff to replace over and over. I'm thinking of budgeting around $2000-3000 for towers or bigger bookshelves that have a 8" woofers. Is what I'm saying have any merit about the subs ?
Maybe something like the Wharfedale LINTON Heritage (6 ohms sensitivity: 90 dB) I like it's sound sig according to reviews a warmish smooth sound. I want something that will play good with older recordings like older Metallica stuff. There's also the Polk Audio Reserve R700 (8 ohms sensitivity: 88 dB) I guess in the end will my AVR Onkyo TX-NR6100 do these either these speaker options justice ?
Hi,
there is so many brands and makes and models in your posts that I'll give some food for thought, how you can reason the stuff without reading marketing material, to estimate which speaker might work better if you need more SPL capability before bad sound.
What makes speaker distort? the electro-mechanical properties in a driver gets to limits and result is sound that deviates from the original.
How does it happen? Sound wavelength gets very long at low frequencies: while 340Hz is only 1meter long, 34Hz is already 10 meters. What this means is that to keep loudspeaker frequency response "flat" with static cone size like in 6.5" nominal, then the excursion must go up the lower the frequency and it doesn't go up linearly but has to quadruple for every octave. If reaching some SPL at 200Hz needs 1mm of excursion from a woofer, then reaching 100Hz with same SPL would require 4mm, 50Hz would require 16mm, 25Hz would require 64mm. One could quadruple the cone area instead, now the 25Hz would require only 16mm of excursion, or 50Hz the 4mm. This is peak-to-peak excursion, volume displacement.
Ok whats the problem? if there is bass note at 50Hz that sends the cone to high excursion (of its max capability) the woofer parameters change for the whole bandwidth. On a small two way speaker this affects sound all the way up to perhaps 2-3kHz and beyond. Lets pause time here and think: the voice coil has moved greatly in the gap, suspension stiffens, some heat builds up, many things happen in the motor that change its electrical and mechanical parameters compared to resting position. Now that we are at this peak excursion with our low note there is also high frequency components playing, like click sound of the kick, or singing, guitars, everything, but as the cone is out due to the low note all the high frequencies for the whole woofer bandwidth are distorted.
Same could happen with a tweeter, if the crossover is too low, the tweeter would distort due to long travel, parameters changing, distortion.
Now, how to take advantage on this simple knowledge? if we use logic on this basic concept of minimizing excursion we can now reason what kind of a speaker likely has more SPL capability before bad sound: cone excursion for any frequency can be reduced by increasing ways of the speaker which reduces bandwidth of each way. Or increasing cone area. Or use better transducers that can do high excursion without electro-mechanical parameters changing too much, with low distortion. To get extra octave down, or 6db more head room with some particular excursion, you need to quadruple cone area. Instead of single 6.5" driver go for 4, or equivalent like single 12" for a two way box. To reduce likelihood of amplifier distortion more sensitive speakers would be reasonable, which again means big woofers. To get very good drivers that do get higher excursion without too much distortion they cost so much you simply can't get finished speaker below few thousand with all supply chain profit margins pumping the price up. If parts cost a thousand, manufacturing another, the speaker prices is 4-10k.
Or, use high pass filter to slash the (woofer) excursion to quarter, for every octave, or 6db more headroom per octave you cut if its the woofer excursion that causes the bad sound. For very good system we don't want to do this, ideally we would want full 20-20kHz audible bandwidth full blast SPL capability. You can test with the high pass filter though, listen at the verge of bad sound, then engage the high pass filter for 40Hz and see if the sound cleaned up. Raise to 80Hz to see if it cleaned up. If it did, you can hopefully now estimate how to get there with lows intact.
edit. checked the speakers you listed and it applying above reasoning they probably play louder before distortion than speakers what you currently have.