Exactly.It's not complicated. Measurements tell us nearly everything we need to know. Even with speakers. Get stuff that measures well (aka does what it's supposed to do and nothing more or less) and then set it up in the room as best you can (the room/speaker relationship is where most of the issues exist). Spend what you can - you can do it pretty successfully for very reasonable amounts thanks to having good information to use (measurments).
There is no system that's good for "everyone" because people have different requirements. But even as a person who values "good sound" in an audiophile sense, I could get by if I had to with a nice bluetooth speaker or a set of bluetooth headphones. Luckily I don't have to.
Perhaps. It seems dopamine may play a significant role as well.Am I just cynical that I think 99% of the "next level" concept is status seeking?
Yes, certainly. It started with me during my education at the engineering school in the sixties, when I once lived in a dormitory for students. Everyone looked to see what kind of stereo system the other person had, and they tried to outdo each other. Apparently that was also important to impress the girls. I still remember that I had a Harman Kardon receiver and Sonab speakers in my work and bedroom at that time. I think the record player was a Toshiba.Am I just cynical that I think 99% of the "next level" concept is status seeking?
Yes. I'm moved by the music no matter how bad the system is.Interestingly, I've had that emotional response to music on almost every piece of audio equipment I've owned over the past 40 years...much of which has been decidedly not high fidelity. There isn't a magical level to be achieved. If you have a set up that is doing the basic thing that it's supposed to do (accurately reproducing a recording at the spl you require) you are set.
It's narcissism.Am I just cynical that I think 99% of the "next level" concept is status seeking?
Maybe also hedonism?It's narcissism.
I love listening to music in the car.Yes. I'm moved by the music no matter how bad the system is.
I prefer to think of myself as fitting all of the adjectives and none of the descriptions of monomania.I'm curious what folks here think.
Another suitable adjective would be elitist.monomania
Idk. If you don't show off to a peer group does it count as status seeking?Am I just cynical that I think 99% of the "next level" concept is status seeking?
If you don't post about it or show it off? Maybe not, although I bet people collect all sorts of expensive things seeking status.Idk. If you don't show off to a peer group does it count as status seeking?
In which case I should register as the monomaniac, the only one here crazy enough to argue that stereo was the single most stupid technical development in the history of our hobby.Mine's more stereomania.
/I'll be here all day, folks!
Like I said, I really don't know. I rather feel that knowing you've got a truly superior X than almost everyone else and not bragging about it because you derive satisfaction from knowing that you could brag but don't is still status seeking.If you don't post about it or show it off? Maybe not, although I bet people collect all sorts of expensive things seeking status.