beagleman
Major Contributor
Whatever the 12.1 can do, the 12.2 does it better. On the spec sheet the 12.2 has a lower crossover at 2khz compared to 2.7khz of the 12.1 but I dont know if that changes anything. And deeper bass of course. Way deeper. The Diamond 12s are killer at this price, and that BBC Dip is what makes this speaker sound so smooth. Barely listen to the LS50 anymore since I got these.
I got the 12.1 a few weeks back, and have to say, quite neutral, and very listenable overall.
I pair mine with a decent sub crossed at 120hz. So bass is really a non issue in my application.
With minor EQ they become close to excellent, except for maybe very high levels, obviously.
Would love to see more info of the 12.2 tested by Erin or Amir to see what differs between these models.
I got mine for all of $200.00 on special so quite impressed with the value.
I also had a pair of LS-50 to compare my 12.1 to and the LS-50 are now sitting on the floor with a steelers towel over them.
Not a huge difference, but felt somehow the 12.1 were simply a bit more accurate and for sure easier to listen to overall.
Now possibly looking to try the 12.C center channel, even though only an MTM config, and maybe find a set of 12.3 to try out!