I have been amused how many classic men's watches of the era before a hockey puck for the wrist became fashionable are advertised as ladies watches these days.

Big watches are a relatively modern fashion that seems to be passing in recent months.Not really a fan of dainty little watches really, and I have a small wrist. Really, for me a watch smaller than 39mm on a man just looks delicate.
I like elegant as a look, but never dainty and delicate. I find that even oversized looks better. On a man anyway.
Yes, I am very happy with the very slim Racine that my wife presented to me many years ago. It is the only watch that I own & I wear it almost daily (except when I am working, as the things that I do usually are electro-mechanical in some fashion). I have seen someone whose bracelet touched a 100 + amp hour battery and it blew one of his shoes off. It had also blown the bracelet off and the smell of burning human flesh permeated the air. He was OK but has a permanent reminder of what NOT to do burned completely around his wrist/forearm.Big watches are a relatively modern fashion that seems to be passing in recent months.
It is thick watches I really dislike.
I can cope with bigger diameters though they tend to look absurd when chronographs using standard movements because the spacing of the sub dials looks wrong and if it has a display back the movement looks silly in the case too, I have one and regret buying it...
I have just been out to a formal dinner and am wearing an old Vacheron Constantin watch and it is beautifully slim but probably too small for your taste but is way more comfortable and elegant than anything in fashion recently IMO.
Nothing made in Glashutte during the communist regime in East Germany is of high quality.Would that apply to also vintage watches say from the 60s? Or only for the more current models?
I bought and wore a Jaeger LeCoultre reverso for years. Since then they have made bigger versions twice. I still prefer the original but it really looks small next to the current fashion.It might have been NYT or WSJ where I first heard of a trend of guys wearing wearing women's watches, but this article says much the same:
https://www.themanual.com/fashion/womens-watches-for-men-style-trend/
I figure it's partly a backlash to oversized men's watches, getting back to sizes which were more normal before the 1990s or thereabouts. Years ago, I tried a (medium?) Cartier Santos on for size, and it seemed almost dainty compared to some of the chunky beasts which were becoming popular.
Yes I do value elegance very much and it is hard to best the true era of classic designs where sheer elegance is concerned.Big watches are a relatively modern fashion that seems to be passing in recent months.
It is thick watches I really dislike.
I can cope with bigger diameters though they tend to look absurd when chronographs using standard movements because the spacing of the sub dials looks wrong and if it has a display back the movement looks silly in the case too, I have one and regret buying it...
I have just been out to a formal dinner and am wearing an old Vacheron Constantin watch and it is beautifully slim but probably too small for your taste but is way more comfortable and elegant than anything in fashion recently IMO.
I have been amused how many classic men's watches of the era before a hockey puck for the wrist became fashionable are advertised as ladies watches these days.![]()
Ladies that are a bit older like them because they can see the hands without squinting or using reading glasses.I have been amused how many classic men's watches of the era before a hockey puck for the wrist became fashionable are advertised as ladies watches these days.![]()
Not an aesthetic statement, but man what amazing functionality no doubt, and very well priced. Fantastic investment for outdoor enthusiasts.I do wear a Casio G-Shock GW-9500 "Mudman".
Ideal for outdoor, have a compass, altimeter, and barometer (plus the normal hour and date info).
More about in:
![]()
Field Report: G-Shock Mudman GW9500 | Professional Watches
G-Shock redesigned the rugged, outdoor-focused digital “Mudman” collection for 2023, and we field-tested it at the scenic North Cheyenne Cañon Park in Colorado Springs. Within the canyo…professionalwatches.com
I think that is a sad story: You sound like you lack empathy for your watch and how it must feel to be not doing its sole mission in the universe!...And, even today, I have no other watches.
AI have a BR-01 Big Date. Love it.I think that is a sad story: You sound like you lack empathy for your watch and how it must feel to be not doing its sole mission in the universe!
---------------------
But I originally came here to see what @Doodski thinks about this BR-X5 Blue Lum watch:
View attachment 399867500 limited edition @13,300USD
Sunglasses are optional.
OOOOoooooo a glowing watch! I like it. I would be a mark for every mugger in a 100km radius but I would wear it. I like how the entire watch glows. The price is too high. I need about CDN ~$400 to max CDN $~700 price range.I think that is a sad story: You sound like you lack empathy for your watch and how it must feel to be not doing its sole mission in the universe!
---------------------
But I originally came here to see what @Doodski thinks about this BR-X5 Blue Lum watch:
View attachment 399867500 limited edition @13,300USD
Sunglasses are optional.
I googled it. Veryyy nice. I like this glowing B&R too.AI have a BR-01 Big Date. Love it.
I made the mistake of sending my DOA BR03-92 directly to Brietling (Florida) for repairs... that was 11 weeks ago.AI have a BR-01 Big Date. Love it.