No worries, I'm very far from being done anywaysSorry to resurrect an old thread. I really feel that your Denon x4800h and the Audyssey RoomEq is to blame. Any luck yourself? The Ref 3 Meta should be absolutely fantastic with plenty of bass.
Now that i don't have the Denon and the NCx500 anymore, I am trying to figure out what would be better way to measure the in-room response in REW. I have an old Yamaha RXV440RDS receiver driving the KEFs and the Wiim Pro connected to the receiver via SPDIF.Im still waiting for the measurements xD
I fully believe that it has a nice bass. As mentioned, my living room is open from one side, and there is a corridor leading to other rooms (like bedroom, bathroom, etc.). Those rooms are usually kept open because we have a cat who wants to be able to access all the available areas (of course). I was in another room yesterday while the KEFs were playing around -45dB on the Yamaha receiver and - besides the corners and back wall of the living room / listening area - in that other room which is around 9-10 meters away at the end of the corridor, I could still feel the pressure of the bass. It was similar to when my active sub is on (this time it was turned off and they were playing full range). So the bass is there, but not where I'd like it to be (at the MLP in the living room it's gone completely).Sorry to resurrect an old thread. I really feel that your Denon x4800h and the Audyssey RoomEq is to blame. Any luck yourself? The Ref 3 Meta should be absolutely fantastic with plenty of bass.
I have several hot spots for sure - corners, back wall or standing between the two speakers or in the middle of the triangle, and recently I found another one: if I climb up onto something to get closer to the ceiling (3.20m), there's plenty of bass there too, would say more than in the corners.I have Reference 5s in a room far from perfect, without any room treatment. But I really enjoy the speakers as-is although I'm fully aware I'm not obtaining the maximal out of them. However, I had R11s and R900s before (same room, same location) so I can say with confidence that these speaker rock. Especially the bass is night-and-day compared to the R11s.
"Do you think having bass traps in the corners and thick absorbers on the back wall / ceiling could help "redirect" the bass where it should be?"I have several hot spots for sure - corners, back wall or standing between the two speakers or in the middle of the triangle, and recently I found another one: if I climb up onto something to get closer to the ceiling (3.20m), there's plenty of bass there too, would say more than in the corners.
Do you think having bass traps in the corners and thick absorbers on the back wall / ceiling could help "redirect" the bass where it should be?
Of course, current electronics is another suspect (this old receiver is very far from optimal so I'll upgrade it soon, and engage DLBC or ART in addition), but I am now focusing on room acoustics / treatment since it's not a total lack of bass. It's not that I don't have it anywhere in the house.
In addition, both speakers are wobbing on the ground (hardwood floor). I's using the original spikes, but seriously considering a set of Gaia II now.
I will also try to pull the speakers completely away from the wall, almost to the middle of the room, and push the couch all the way to the back wall. But that cannot be a permanent setup (even if it works) unfortunately.
"I've measured the SPL response of the 50Hz tone and most of the higher readings are at the bottom and top of the front wall."or you could go my route:
![]()
Diaphragmal LF Absorbers (aka LMBT) damping and calculation
Hello everyone Now I'm more inclined towards making some diaphragmal LF absorbers with limp membranes. But there are few questions that still unclear. 1) Can I trust to http://www.acousticmodelling.com/multi.php and if yes - which porous model is most realistic below 200 Hz ? Just for...www.audiosciencereview.com
Similar to ART, but combined with some hardware to make it plug and play?![]()
PSI Audio AVAA C20 - Active Bass Trap
Unique: easy to set up and move, no calibration required, as efficient as passive absorbers 25 times its size, the AVAA C20 typically reduces the resonance time of all room modes between 15 Hz and 150 Hz by up to 50%.www.psiaudio.swiss
ArendalI am planning to build a dedicated 2.2 or 2.4 DLBC system using an external multichannel balanced DAC.
Can you recommend subwoofers that could be nicely matched both tonally and visually (white glossy or matte) to the KEFs? Primary use will be home cinema (connected to an AVR too), but in my current untreated room (35m2, open space to other rooms) I will use them for stereo music as well. Max budget is 3000 EUR.
Some candidates that I found so far in the sub comparison chart from @sweetchaos:
- 4x SB1000 Pro or 3x SB2000 Pro. Dual DAC setup required (balanced for LR, unbalanced for the subs).
- 2x KEF KF92, with white vinyl wrap. Same as SVS: dual DAC setup required (balanced for LR, unbalanced for the subs).
- 3x used Arendal 1723 2 (discontinued). White color, both XLR and RCA inputs, so I can connect them to the AVR (via RCA) and the balanced DAC (XLR) at the same time without having to switch.
For the subs placed to the rear wall I will need longer (10-12m) RCA cables, hence I'm considering balanced subs too.
I'm looking at new ones now, 2x 1723 1S or 3x 1961 1S (for better seat-to-seat consistency) could fit into the budget and there are measurements available too.Arendal, 3 used or 2 new
For Subwoofer depends on the listening db top bit honesty For home theater i would go with the bigger ones , myself i have 2 18 inch in open space 35mq , but I could Be satisfied with 2 15 inches but you know .. if you go with the bigger ones you would not ever regret it once you try a very good SubwooferI'm looking at new ones now, 2x 1723 1S or 3x 1961 1S (for better seat-to-seat consistency) could fit into the budget and there are measurements available too.
They seem to be quite close on paper, at 20Hz the smaller 1961 even has the upper hand. I like the smaller form factor of the 1961 but the 1723 is THX certified.
I believe you.For Subwoofer depends on the listening db top bit honesty For home theater i would go with the bigger ones , myself i have 2 18 inch in open space 35mq , but I could Be satisfied with 2 15 inches but you know .. if you go with the bigger ones you would not ever regret it once you try a very good Subwoofer
In order to choose the right sub, besides room size and frequency response (the KEF's will be high-passed at 50-60Hz), what other factors should I consider to match them with the mains? Reading comments about the KF92 being able to integrate better with the Ref 3 compared to others, I'm wondering how much does it actually matters if the crossovers / delay / phase correction / etc. all will be handled by DLBC.For Subwoofer depends on the listening db top bit honesty For home theater i would go with the bigger ones , myself i have 2 18 inch in open space 35mq , but I could Be satisfied with 2 15 inches but you know .. if you go with the bigger ones you would not ever regret it once you try a very good Subwoofer