If you actually read the very first post in this thread you will quickly realise no bogus significance is being claimed .. there's plenty of " in my opinion " and a open invitation to scrutinise the testing.
Hes tested and given his opinion based on those results, offered complete transparency to make sure the tests are as correct as possible. So amirs test informed his opinion and he's offered both up for challenge.
I'm not sure why you seem to be creating a issue where non exists in this regard, it seems unnecessarily pedantic tbh .
lets be sensible, medical trials for drugs to be used on humanoids and testing a PSU for a USB widget are two strikingly different things, the level of jeopardy is very different. again Iv no idea why you seem to want to drill into a perfectly reasonable analogy and get pedantic about it.
Other than that I can see why taking a post from elsewhere might give a slight grievance, it's a kind of violation in a way just it's not as all content posted publicly like this is just that, public. Still one maintaining a sense of ownership over their words and feeling attached to them as a part of their own self or property is normal.
How you translate that feeling and prescribe amir to be immature, obnoxious in his actions is again beyond my understanding. Impolite, I can understand but given the context of this being the Internet/social media I'd recommend a more robust sentimentality be considered.
I used to feel aggrieved when my posts got quoted line by line so multiple quotes in a retort. I found it rather aggressive, like every sentence is under attack and impolite to say the least. I guess over time I just got used to the feeling and now with all the aggravation I get doing this job I long for the days of a simple multi quoted retort.