JSmith
Master Contributor
No, as I said earlier A-weighting has been applied;assumedly with newer version of AP shows 128dB
JSmith
No, as I said earlier A-weighting has been applied;assumedly with newer version of AP shows 128dB
I'd assume because for that kind of money you could build a small form factor computer and put PEQ software on it and have it feed a cheap audibly transparent dac.
with the proper compontents the pc will give you more possible inputs, and outputs.
I don't think that was the insinuation but perhaps we'll find out. The limitation of what you describe is, that only gets you PEQ from that computer and not any other source, though that won't matter for everyone.
That's why I bought a used Topping D10s. Depreciation giveth as well as taketh away.This is why I stay well clear of chinese audio products, crazy depracation because of this.
Yay, destroying the value of the previous models by releasing a 'new' one for a dB of measurement difference. This is why I stay well clear of chinese audio products, crazy depracation because of this.
Most western made audio products depreciate at a similar rate these days, even from renowned brands like Bricasti, Pass Labs, and many others, and even when there isn't a newer model to replace them.
AP says there is no difference. And I know a company that has both revisions and performance is the same.I believe 123dB is the limit of APx555 that Amir owns, their own measurements - assumedly with newer version of AP shows 128dB
Probably not going to miss the SINADYou mean get the RME?
Radxa X2L: 45$, with Daphile.I'd assume because for that kind of money you could build a small form factor computer and put PEQ software on it and have it feed a cheap audibly transparent dac.
with the proper compontents the pc will give you more possible inputs, and outputs.
because they put almost all the efforts in one race that does not really matter. and then jack up the price significantlyI've been looking forward to this test for a while, and read it with some anticipation.
They've succeeded in their very focussed mission to make the cleanest and quietest DAC that it's possible to make. Succeeded where so many others have failed.
But the audience is hard to please.
so just "distort" measurements to show improvements. got itAP says there is no difference. And I know a company that has both revisions and performance is the same.
What are you saying???so just "distort" measurements to show improvements. got it
maybe distort is the wrong word but for the lack of better word - they were using A-weighted to show higher SINAD if I understand correctlyWhat are you saying???