It would've been fixed long ago if there's a better solution. The channel matching is just great in this configuration with these pots.i have the same problem on mine. i wish topping would use better knob without this loose feedback.
It would've been fixed long ago if there's a better solution. The channel matching is just great in this configuration with these pots.i have the same problem on mine. i wish topping would use better knob without this loose feedback.
It would've been fixed long ago if there's a better solution. The channel matching is just great in this configuration with these pots.
Yeah. Because I went for channel matching and noise performance. The trade off must be here.i don't feel that way on daily use. the volume knobs on other gear i own are very precise without this loose feedback, sound changes as soon as i move them (as it should), so there is better solution already. and i'm not talking channel matching, it's the give (knob moving before actually doing something) i dislike.
Do you want subjective or measurements comparison ?How does the 1/4 SE performance compare to the JDS Atom Amp?
Do you want subjective or measurements comparison ?
Measurements could be found on this forum so you can compare by yourself. In general: Atom has more power into SE than A50s.
Subjectively : A50s sounds cleaner with better separation. I have both and they do sound different on both SMSL SU-9 and Topping D50s.
... they do sound different on both SMSL SU-9 and Topping D50s.
Is the balance on A50s a "true balance" (2 circuits)? I'm contemplating the following:
- Atom ~$145
- L30 ~$139
- A50s ~$199
For context I have a Sundara and plan to get a cable depending on this choice (4.4 or 1/4). I plan to keep using my Macbooks's DAC for now and get a matching DAC later, A50s doesn't stand that far in terms of price for the bonuses of balance and a nicer build, but to complete the stack the D50s ($250) will shift things significantly unless it goes down in price next year. What do you think?
I've started with the same configuration but when I saw A50s for 170$ ...Interesting, I already own the D50s and have been pairing it with the Atom Amp.
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience with A50. I've read that A50s uses different architecture and that's all.@4udio I have no intention of spending that much, I'm looking for best value since my budget is actually $200, I might stretch it only if I'm getting a big upgrade.
A50s to D50s connection isn't balanced so I don't see an advantage to the D50s expect the look, so I will only get a D50s if I got the A50s and it dropped in price significantly, it looks like D50s is where Topping is making the most profit, A50s is the lead magnet and P50 is the "coup de grâce".
Do you know any differences between A50s and A50?
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience with A50. I've read that A50s uses different architecture and that's all.
If you don't need balanced output , both L30 and Atom are good choice but I think that 145$ price is a bit too much for Atom considering build quality (completely made out of plastique, very light and , reported by some reviews, volume pot can have channel disbalance)
L30 don't really get much hotter than Atom.Yup shipping is high, Atom is just $99 or $89 B-stock, I contacted JDS but they don't plan to switch back to USPS anytime soon due to high loss rate. Looks like all budget amps have some issue, Liquid spark and L30 get hot, Atom has poor build, Heresy suffers from QC issues, maybe I should just save up some more and get Element II or roll a dice.
Well D50s is heavy with full CNC aluminium block. Cost a lot to manufacturer and to ship. And for it's one of the cheaper dual 9038q dac out there.@4udio I have no intention of spending that much, I'm looking for best value since my budget is actually $200, I might stretch it only if I'm getting a big upgrade.
A50s to D50s connection isn't balanced so I don't see an advantage to the D50s expect the look, so I will only get a D50s if I got the A50s and it dropped in price significantly, it looks like D50s is where Topping is making the most profit, A50s is the lead magnet and P50 is the "coup de grâce".
Do you know any differences between A50s and A50?
That's really up to you. You don't have to get the matching dac either.Is the balance on A50s a "true balance" (2 circuits)? I'm contemplating the following:
- Atom ~$145
- L30 ~$139
- A50s ~$199
For context I have a Sundara and plan to get a cable depending on this choice (4.4 or 1/4). I plan to keep using my Macbooks's DAC for now and get a matching DAC later, A50s doesn't stand that far in terms of price for the bonuses of balance and a nicer build, but to complete the stack the D50s ($250) will shift things significantly unless it goes down in price next year. What do you think?
Edit: A50 is way cheaper than A50s what's the difference?
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience with A50.
I have Sundara, D50s and both A50 and L30. Both of these amps sound perfectly equal. A50 has more power than L30 on unbalanced, so even more than A50s. With its price drop can't think of anything better for the money than A50 if balanced is required and if one can still find it. L30 is also fantastic amp for Sundara and for the price. IMHO A50s makes sense only if balanced output is mandatory.
I'm the one of those that actually notice such things but I don't mind it as long as usability and durability is not compromised (confirmed by JohnYang1997).I'm glad I'm not an audio equipment manufacturer because I'd lose my shit when things like pot backlash are presented as problems when 98% of people wouldn't even notice and 1.9% of those that notice it would realize it's not relevant.
The A50s volume pot is fine and works very well. There is no issue.
The D50s joystick looks OK and also works well but it's a tiny bit cheap looking, for my taste.
I agree.The A50s/D50s/P50 stack is a beautiful set of gear that produces wonderful sound quality. I like the size of the volume knob, also. This equipment is a pleasure to own, look at, and use.
Thank you, Topping.