I bet there is. Mine are DIY, so I have no dog in the race, so to speak.And when I ask for this price range?
There's is NO speaker worth this price which is better built?
The recent KEFs are also nice.Thanks for your sincere answer. I don't think Revel or KEF make bad speakers
I could be happy with those maybe. I've heard Salon2s and K2 S9900s and I could most definitely live with those. Although the S9900s are a bit pricier.Yeah, I heard the Blade 2 recently and I was really impressed
It's just some stereo equipment... you might be a little too invested in other people's opinions.@Hart I know it SEEMS 'bad-mannered", but I am done with people so easily 'shouting' about 'too high priced' and other ways of expressing their opinion about gear which is not THEIR thing WITHOUT naming speakers which are 'really good' regardless of the price OR for the same price as these TAD's.
Some of them did but count the people who didn't.
invested is maybe interestedIt's just some stereo equipment... you might be a little too invested in other people's opinions.
Big different between Salon 2 and K2 S9900?I could be happy with those maybe. I've heard Salon2s and K2 S9900s and I could most definitely live with those. Although the S9900s are a bit pricier.
Yes, the S9900 is about $45k typically. Salon2 is more like $12k. As far as I'm concerned, they're complimentary. The Salon2 is really smooth, and has good dynamics. The S9900 has fantastic dynamics, but is still quite smooth. The standard disclaimer applies that I have horn speakers, so I'm partial.Big different between Salon 2 and K2 S9900?
That one measures pretty flat. Maybe more to the point, it looks expensive.This does not seem to be as appealing as its predecessor even given the different testing protocols.
https://www.stereophile.com/content/tad-evolution-one-loudspeaker
This does not seem to be as appealing as its predecessor even given the different testing protocols.
https://www.stereophile.com/content/tad-evolution-one-loudspeaker
My point, too.Did this really replace that?
I thought it might be a new lower-cost model under Evo 1.My point, too.
That's correct evolution series 2 is another (read 'lower') series than the evolution one (the last one is 'higher' series)I thought it might be a new lower-cost model under Evo 1.
Kal,This does not seem to be as appealing as its predecessor even given the different testing protocols.
https://www.stereophile.com/content/tad-evolution-one-loudspeaker
Second photo is of an M1, third is R1, fourth is CR1. All designed by Andrew Jones. I owned M1s and now have R1s that with Andrew’s help are biamped.Reference One Mk2