We all hear differently.
We all hear differently, but that also applies to the original sound.
We all hear differently.
We all hear differently, but that also applies to the original sound.
If you have ketchup with everything, you will never taste anything but ketchup. But if you like it, why not..?In the end go with what pleases you.
Interesting "Dope from Hope". An ironical double entendre, for sure. PK had a sense of humor along with his inability to stomach what he considered nonsense. In any case, around the mid '70s it seems everyone was worked up over Matti Otala's transient intermodulation distortion idea. Paul discusses it in his news letters. I recall reading a couple of projects in Audio magazine from Marshall Leach about building a "low TIM" amplifier. And this was before there were really any standards for measuring TIM.
However all that was back then, you don't hear much about TIM, anymore. I'm not an amp designer, so I'm at the periphery. But I'm asking anyone here who cares to respond, and who knows about modern-day amplifier design, whether TIM is anything anyone is actively working out?
Same here, but 4 rooms . Living room with the main system (small active 3-way studio monitors with a sub), wifes room with TV and small stereo system (JBL LSR2325, no sub - wife hates deep bass), my work room (2 very small active studio monitors, no sub[1]), bath room (old car radio in a box with a DIY power supply and 2 small passive DIY speakers). My inherited Mackie HR824 studio monitors are currently used in the workers council office for Webex - total overkill for sure, but we never had such a good speech intelligibility."So what's the bottom line? What you really need, desire and want are several listening rooms. "
[..]
I have 3 working systems in threee rooms at home and one more at summer cabin. Main system has diy dipole 4-ways as stereo/mains and bookshelf monitors to make it 5.0. HT room system has diy coaxial monitors as L/C/R and two-way montors on rear, and a big diy subwoofer. Third set has diy bookshelf 2-ways. Sumemr cabin has old sonab omnipole stereo speakers and a 12V car radio as source! Then add the three diy stereo speaker sets that I have made/given for my kids, so far!
Well there was the time my Phase Linear 700B went insane and took out a K-33 woofer in my La Scala's.I don't think I've ever heard of anyone melting a woofer voicecoil in a domestic setting.
Well there was the time my Phase Linear 700B went insane and took out a K-33 woofer in my La Scala's.
PL 700B's were kind of known for being a little schizophrenic.
She made one horrendous noise before all went quiet.
I really don't know for sure, it just didn't make any sound at all any more.I'm curious, did it melt it or did it blow out the suspension?
As an owner of La Scala II speakers, I can comment about the pluses and minunses. Sound is not what I want to comment on. Anyone interested will have their own opinions. I'd like to mention the fit and finish. Klipsch does not use a solid wood--I doubt anyone does that, anymore. But rather a thin glued on veneer over something pressed. It almost has a 'plasticky' kind of look and feel, up close. So it is not 'fine furniture' grade, regardless of what you might read. That said, from a distance it looks very refined. Whether a glued on veneer strip will last is anyone's guess. Glue has a habit of ungluing.
I would never advise anyone to spend the price of these unless they really think it through. A home audition would be necessary, but that is kind of impractical. These are not easy to move around, and placement is not a foolproof thing. They are a lot bigger in person than they look in pictures, and they look big in pics.
One thing I will say about the sound. For certain types of music I've never heard anything that matches them. Maybe another horn type speaker, but I've not heard the more expensive horns. Klipsch do not sound like a box, or an electrostatic. Some would say the LF is deficient. Others might call it 'funny'. It does not sound like a box woofer, and experimenting with a subwoofer may be beneficial. However, with my Benchmark amplifier I can play louder and clearer than I want, with no fatigue.
So what's the bottom line? What you really need, desire and want are several listening rooms. One with Quad electrostatics. Another with PK speakers. Another with something like the Revel line, or B&Ws, or whatever else strikes your aural fancy.
I really don't know for sure, it just didn't make any sound at all any more.
Do you think a Phase Linear might have been a little much, in the context of a La Scala? Whew! In one of the Dopes from Hope Paul writes (doing this from memory so it might not be exact) 100 watts/ch is probably all anyone would need with his speaker designs, and that's a lot. He advised to always fuse the speaker with high power amplifiers. I think this particular item was written around the time Bob was selling his big amps, and high power was becoming really popular. Of course if an amp blows up, anything downstream could be vunerable, regardless of the amp's RMS power.Well there was the time my Phase Linear 700B went insane and took out a K-33 woofer in my La Scala's.
PL 700B's were kind of known for being a little schizophrenic.
She made one horrendous noise before all went quiet.
Wellllllllllll, I don't know, what do you think? LOLDo you think a Phase Linear might have been a little much, in the context of a La Scala?
He measured it in Art's driveway, freespace.To the efficiency point, a quote from the Art Dudley Klipschorn review:
"In the years since the Klipschorn's debut, loudspeaker technology has progressed in many ways. Speakers that sound timbrally neutral and uncolored are much more common today, as are speakers with consistent and effective dispersion across their operating range. Thanks to the pioneering work of people like Jon Dahlquist, Jim Thiel, Richard Vandersteen, and John Fuselier (footnote 2), physical time alignment of drivers in a dynamic loudspeaker system is virtually a given these days, and the problem of baffle edge diffraction has been identified and smacked upside the head. The result is a great selection of loudspeakers that offer apparently flat frequency response, superb stereo imaging, and great airiness and transparency.
And what did we give up to gain such easy access to all those things? Natural-sounding dynamics. Impact. Pluck. Snap. Body—especially body. And soul."
Read more at https://www.stereophile.com/content/klipsch-klipschorn-ak6-loudspeaker-page-2#p8muzdMpqxEJ3YdK.99
But then you have graphs like this: