• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Sound leakage through cone material and passive radiators

Penelinfi

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2021
Messages
453
Likes
341
Is this generally anything to worry about? We seem to make really solid cabinets but then you still have a thin piece of paper/metal/plastic that while damped, you would think lets a bit of sound back out from the enclosure.

Maybe using smaller drivers for higher frequencies reduces this effect as you can absorb said higher frequencies better, leaving only bass for larger drivers/not enough room to be delayed

Then again maybe it's not a huge issue, as people still love the sound of all sorts of speakers with big midrange and passive radiators
 

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
3,033
Likes
3,995
It's similar to a port in a ported speaker.

If there are (undamped) resonances in the box that's usually a problem anyway and they can also "leak through" the woofer cone. (If you compare box dimensions to wavelength, box resonances tend to be in the midrange. (That's separate from a tuned port.)
 

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,405
Likes
24,758
I've never worried about it per se.
I'd "worry" more about backwave sound coming out of the ports in bass reflex enclosures. ;)
 

Killingbeans

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 23, 2018
Messages
4,098
Likes
7,578
Location
Bjerringbro, Denmark.
Is this generally anything to worry about?

Good question. Some designs go to pretty extreme lengths to absorb the backwave, but I've never seen any tests showing how it improves fidelity.

BW-Nautilus-scaled-1-scaled-1.jpg
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,212
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
I'd "worry" more about backwave sound coming out of the ports
Yes, Amir has several nasty examples of midrange leakage from ports.
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,212
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
If in doubt, putting the port on the back or bottom helps a lot.
 

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,405
Likes
24,758
If in doubt, putting the port on the back or bottom helps a lot.
True but at the cost (in the case of rear porting) of potentially limiting placement options.
That said, I've got a couple of rear-ported loudspeakers here that do fine -- but I also have plenty of space behind them.
 

olieb

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
355
Likes
583
Is this generally anything to worry about?
Probably there is no simple answer.
As so often Linkwitz has studied this, but only for the case of a tube cabinet (Pluto/Lxmini).
He took care that the back wave through the cone is damped well enough.
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,212
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
True but at the cost (in the case of rear porting) of potentially limiting placement options.
That said, I've got a couple of rear-ported loudspeakers here that do fine -- but I also have plenty of space behind them.
I prefer bottom ported.
 
OP
Penelinfi

Penelinfi

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2021
Messages
453
Likes
341
I prefer bottom ported.
That's another thing - people have generally said you need 2-3 feet of space for rear ports, but then we have bottom ports with 1" of space. Granted they are tuned for that, but still
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,212
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
That's another thing - people have generally said you need 2-3 feet of space for rear ports, but then we have bottom ports with 1" of space. Granted they are tuned for that, but still
You need about a port width, maybe 1.5 x port width with rear ports.
 
Top Bottom