• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SMSL D-6s Balanced DAC Review

Rate this DAC:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 9 2.1%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 28 6.7%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 376 89.7%

  • Total voters
    419
Try it…
P.S. Non puoi avere la botte piena e la moglie ubriaca
In fact, I wanted to understand if I could get what I needed with Foobar, and I think I solved the problem on the Mac side. I have given up DSDs and MQAs, therefore, the wife will remain sober. I tried something at 352 kHz on the D-6S, and it actually sounds divine. The problem is that the music I listen to (70s -80s-90s) is rarely high sampling, because the recording masters are at 44.1 kHz. I don't like solutions where you have to pay a subscription for a simple player. If I have to spend money on Audirvāna, I prefer to get a Tidal subscription and connect the Eversolo A6 to my M2, but I don't like streaming music as mentioned.
 
You asked for a player to bypass the Mac, with Audirvāna you can use plug-ins (for example for Dirac or parametric and non-parametric EQ and you can play songs up to DSD...).
I also don't like the annual cost and if you don't need Audirvāna for streaming (even in streaming with Tidal you can have everything and more than what I indicated in brackets...) there is the "classic" version which you can purchase without further future costs. ;)
 
I'll give you my brief experience. I was also intrigued by the Topping D50III and waited to see how it went. While waiting, I got the D-6S because it has been out for 1 year, therefore, it has been tested by users who have highlighted its strengths and weaknesses. I was amazed by the D-6S, so much so that I wrote here about the only flaw I found, which we later saw did not depend on the D-6S but on the Foobar2000 drivers. I can tell you not to go beyond 200 dollars, because the more you go up in price the more they start to give you "accessories" and therefore it no longer becomes a simple DAC but something else, except for the R2R DACs which I haven't tried yet. If you need more inputs, a preamp etc. then go up the price otherwise it's not worth it. I haven't tried the AKM processors, I wanted to but I saw that you pay more for processors that are less easy to produce, given the company's problems. The "cheap" DAC models that have AKMs save on the power supply phase, and have problems (E30 ii lite for example). I wanted to try E70 Velvet, but I gave up. The dual chip solution is not always the best, just like the pro models. Just read the previous pages of this and other topics. Therefore, it is worth risking a large sum if you have the ability to resist it if it doesn't go well. As for EQ, I have the Eversolo DMP A6 which has a software EQ, compared to the A8 (which I wanted to get just for the EQ processor). The EQ of the A6 is not the best, it dirty the signal. I used it little. Ultimately my EQ, on the main system, is the toe-in arrangement of the speakers (after looking at the polar diagrams). But you can also do EQ with amplifiers, if the speaker allows bi-wiring (with the separate tweeter circuit). So, EQ depends on many things for desktop use you can use different software. For Hi-fi systems, it is more complicated and you need to know more information (room, speakers, amplifier, etc.).

All in all, the d-6s may not be aesthetically the best, but it sounds good. The topping d50iii I wanted to try it but decided not to, because the optical output is important to me, also with the Mac I think there are no hum problems, but on an assembled pc it depends on the PSU I'm afraid (I wanted to do this test, but the optical output blocked me, and I'm not sure it will be solved with the FW). The d-6s doesn't pop at all to me; it's paired with a REGA IO (which has lousy measurements, but sounds good to me and doesn't heat up like an oven). The pops you hear on the sampling change may be related to the recordings. I happened to hear them only with Flacs made from vinyls, which I deleted. So you should buy one and try it out, if possible get it on Amazon so you can send it back after the 30 days if you see it doesn't satisfy you.
Thanks for your input! Heavily leaning toward D-6s now.

Do you know if anyone has measured SINAD for the D-6s's Bluetooth LDAC performance?
 
Thanks for your input! Heavily leaning toward D-6s now.

Do you know if anyone has measured SINAD for the D-6s's Bluetooth LDAC performance?
I tried only the USB and Optical connection. The latter actually goes up to 192 khz at 24 bits. Bluetooth I have not tried it yet because I will not use it. I don't even have a chance to try it with high sampled tracks to test its limitation.
My advice is to wait until November 29, see if topping will release a new FW in the meantime, and take advantage of Amazon's BF to try the d-6s and the d50iii. As I told you I got a little out of the mood with the d50iii. These products have a not very long life from what I've read--every year they churn out one, so buy the one that costs the least with the view of changing it in two years. That is also why I got the d6s. I don't know why but smsl I see it as more durable than topping, reading some reviews on the internet. I had also considered the new DAC from Fosi, and I read problems with the optical drive with it as well. That is why I tell you hours of what you find for less, there is no absolute "best," only the one that has the least problems and therefore the most life.
 
Try usb-out from node to D-6S (with appropriate adapters). You may have to reboot node before it detects the usb as output.

Link
Its a Bluesound Node 2i so the USB is only for storage. I think as of the N130 its a digital out
 
@HapaxLegomenon
I once measured a multitone stimulus via LDAC on the D-6s for two different levels. Source was REW with the Alterantive A2dp driver under W10.
The ADC was likely limiting the performance in the lower part of the spectrum, since when using USB as source for the D-6s the spectrum was not significantly better.
For measurements see:

When I find some time, I will repeat these measurements with the ADCiso I own in the meantime. This should reveal the real limits of the combo "A2dp -W10 / D-6s".
 
I wanted to give some other comparison ideas on the d-6s. My configuration is: MAC MINI M2 - D-6S - REGA IO - JBL STAGE A130 -SUBWOOFER VELODYNE MINIVIEE X. Before the MINIVIEE X I used a JL AUDIO D110 (currently retired). I bought the amplifier before the ASR review, if I had seen it I probably wouldn't have bought it. In any case, the idea is the following: in my modest listening space (a studio of around 16 square meters with a sloping ceiling and an average height of 2 metres) since I got the D-6S I no longer feel the need to use the subwoofer (and it is something I never thought would happen). The REGA IO's knob is at half way, while the DAC's is at 99db. I check the volume on the Mac and it is at minimum. As far as I'm concerned, this DAC pairs very well with the REGA IO, the bass is present, controlled and dry at this listening volume. I pushed the REGA IO to the maximum, after reading the review here on ASR, and I found only one song from my collection (Lady Gaga - Dance in the dark - flac at 44.1 kHz 16 bit) which causes the amplifier causing (at maximum volume) significant distortion on the speaker driver (subwoofer off). I make both subwoofers work at 45 Hz, the miniviee to get these bass. I wanted to compare myself with those who use class D amplifiers. I wanted to try some other amplifiers for comparison, but I saw that all the amplifiers sold on Amazon and reviewed here have overheating and reliability problems, while the REGA IO, classified as an oven , for me it doesn't get so hot that I can't put a hand on the case, I listen in the evening for about 3 hours on average. I have seen that the speakers manage a maximum of 125W of power, so I would only take into consideration comparisons with amplifiers not exceeding 125W into 6 ohms, which have no problems and above all which do not have noises such as the famous POPs. Let me start by saying that I have already used class D amplifiers (Coktail Audio X40 which left me this year after 9 wonderful years on my main system, replaced by the Eversolo DMP A6).
 
@HapaxLegomenon
When I find some time, I will repeat these measurements with the ADCiso I own in the meantime. This should reveal the real limits of the combo "A2dp -W10 / D-6s".
Here are multitone measurements with the ADCiso as ADC:

Source: REW on W10 with Alternative A2DP driver 24bit for LDAC
DAC: D-6s
ADC: ADCiso mono mode with APU 34dB for attenuated source with -40dBFS, -60dBFS
1) Reference: D-6s connected via USB
2) 0dBFS, HQ
3) -40dBFS, HQ
4) -60dBFS, HQ
5) 0dBFS, SQ
6) 0dBFS, MQ

In High-Quality mode of the alternative A2DP driver (990kBit/s) the quality almost keeps up with CD format even with 60dB attenuation at the source REW.
 

Attachments

  • Multitone_D-6s-USB-96ks_0dBFS_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    Multitone_D-6s-USB-96ks_0dBFS_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    109.2 KB · Views: 46
  • Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-HQ-96ks_0dBFS_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-HQ-96ks_0dBFS_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    107.7 KB · Views: 46
  • Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-HQ-96ks_-40dBFS_APU34dB_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-HQ-96ks_-40dBFS_APU34dB_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    104.9 KB · Views: 48
  • Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-HQ-96ks_-60dBFS_APU34dB_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-HQ-96ks_-60dBFS_APU34dB_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    100.4 KB · Views: 46
  • Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-SQ-96ks_0dBFS_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-SQ-96ks_0dBFS_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    118.6 KB · Views: 45
  • Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-MQ-96ks_0dBFS_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    Multitone_D-6s-altA2DP-MQ-96ks_0dBFS_ADCiso-mono-96kS.png
    118.8 KB · Views: 53
Good evening from a new Italian user. I wanted to write my little contribution on the wonderful D-6S here. Impressive audio quality for the money. The DAC is connected in coaxial mode with a streamer used as transport, the Cocktail Audio X14. In this configuration no clicks or other problems when changing sampling frequency.
Just a couple of problems: the MQA and DSD signals are not displayed on the DAC display.
Do you think the new firmware version can solve the problem?
 
No streaming service, I listen to albums from Cocktail Audio's internal hard drive.
MQA and DSD tracks are regularly identified by the Cocktail through its display...
 
Last edited:
Overlooking the fact that MQA is dead but MQA was only available on streaming...
 
... even if I have albums on my hard disk that the Cocktail reports MQA or DSD to me...
 
but MQA was only available on streaming...
I don't know where you got that idea. 2L have a number of releases on physical media and for download. Qobuz and HDTracks don't make a point of talking about MQA, but content supplied by some labels has been reported as MQA encoded, including for download. I'd prefer it to be clear so I could avoid them, but very few mention it.
 
Pretty sure you can still buy/download MQA files, eg: https://www.prostudiomasters.com/album/page/312433
Regardless, I have an early D6s with what I assume is older firmware and the DSD and MQA lights both work with locally hosted files via Audirvana.
Maybe they work in USB... In Coax the D6s doesn't detect them. Which firmware version are you referring to? How can I identify the one installed on mine?
 
I have about 700 albums with 22,000 tracks ripped lossless sitting on a new Mac Mini M4. About 80 of these are ripped SACDs or ripped DVD-audio discs, the rest are ripped CDs. I am using an 11 year old Meridian Explorer DAC connected to the Mac Mini via USB and then connected to an Outlaw Audio receiver via RCA cables. I use Roon to manage and play my albums

Will the SMSL D-6S provide better sound quality than my 11 year old Meridian Explorer?
 
I have about 700 albums with 22,000 tracks ripped lossless sitting on a new Mac Mini M4. About 80 of these are ripped SACDs or ripped DVD-audio discs, the rest are ripped CDs. I am using an 11 year old Meridian Explorer DAC connected to the Mac Mini via USB and then connected to an Outlaw Audio receiver via RCA cables. I use Roon to manage and play my albums

Will the SMSL D-6S provide better sound quality than my 11 year old Meridian Explorer?
I'm ready to play a pound on it... it's definitely better because it's not the purchase price that counts but the technologies implemented and in this the D-6s is cutting edge.
Before I had a Teac UD-H01 that with the same streamer did not detect 24/192 even though it was compatible.
This is to say that technology is important...
 
Last edited:
Has anyone updated the firmware?
Improvements?
Problems?
Is it worth it?
 
Question that interests me too.
the only thing I understood from the previous posts is that they revised the FL1/FL7 table
 
Back
Top Bottom