• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

SMSL D-6 DAC Review

Rate this DAC:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 11 3.7%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther

    Votes: 91 30.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 195 64.8%

  • Total voters
    301

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
45,646
Likes
252,980
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the SMSL D-6 balanced stereo DAC with Bluetooth. It was sent to be by Shenzhenaudio and costs US $169.99.
SMSL D-6 Review Balanced Stereo USB DAC.jpg

I like the compact enclosure even though there is a built-in power supply and balanced outputs. Included volume control lets you bypass a pre-amp and driver a power amplifier directly.
SMSL D-6 Review Balanced Bluetooth Stereo USB DAC.jpg

SMSL is joining others in using compact TRS for balanced output. Along those lines, USB input is also the diminutive USB-C connector.

I found the navigation of settings or even changing inputs to be somewhat confusing. This is compounded with selections not rolling back to the beginning. So you wind up pressing buttons while seemingly nothing happens because you are at the end of list of selections.

AKM AK4493 DAC chip powers the unit.

SMSL D-6 Measurements
Let's start with RCA output:
SMSL D-6 Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


Distortion is well below threshold of audibility so noise sets SINAD. Switching to balanced output improves the situation still:

SMSL D-6 Balanced Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


For a budget DAC, this is excellent response, ranking above average in that category alone: (highlighted in yello)
Best stereo USB DAC review.png


Dynamic range is situated the same:
SMSL D-6 dynamic range Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


Multitone test shows off the low distortion:
SMSL D-6 Balanced Multitone Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


Linearity is excellent to 20 bits limit of measurement:
SMSL D-6 Linearity Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


Great to see jitter being extremely low for all three inputs and not just USB:
SMSL D-6 Jitter Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


IMD test shows off the low distortion:
SMSL D-6 Balanced IMD Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


We have the usual filter settings from AKM:
SMSL D-6 Filter Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


None are sadly very sharp so we see the effect in THD+N vs frequency which uses a wideband measurement spectrum of 90 kHz:
SMSL D-6 Balanced THD+N vs Frequency Distortion Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png


We can see why if we perform an FFT:

SMSL D-6 FFT Measurements Balanced Stereo USB DAC.png

Fortunately not an audible artifact.

Conclusions
SMSL delivers an excellently engineered DAC with my favorite features of included power supply and balanced output at very budget friendly price. You don't get state of the art performance but come close while saving fair bit of money. The D-6 is also stylish with its compact and slim size.

I am happy to add SMSL D-6 to my recommended list.

-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Wanted to get the DO100 but price increased from 215€ to 240€ on amazon. I'm probably gonna get the D-6 now
 
If these smaller companies are able to get this kinda performance out of these chip dacs for this kinda price why can't the larger companies with big financial backing get close or equal these dynamic and low distortion numbers in their mid and upper priced AVR's? Or any of their gear..is it a money thing, not cost effective?
 
If these smaller companies are able to get this kinda performance out of these chip dacs for this kinda price why can't the larger companies with big financial backing get close or equal these dynamic and low distortion numbers in their mid and upper priced AVR's? Or any of their gear..is it a money thing, not cost effective?
They simply don't care because their customers don't care either. People like us who care about low distortion, jitter or high dynamic range are the minority
 
Last edited:
They simply don't care because their customers don't care either. People like us who care abut low distortion, jitter or high dynamic range are the minority
Its a shame. I can personally say that some of the reviews that come through here I find rather upsetting. Sorry for going off on a side note, I don't want to detract from SMSL's moment of glory here
 
I which it would be DC powered by USB(C) only :(

Is the balanced output symmetrical "fully balanced" (both lines driven) or only impedance balanced?
 
I vote for a histogram!
Interesting suggestion. In such a graph, you wouldn't be able to see and identify the rest of the products. You are OK with that?
 
@RandomEar Yeah a new color for devices above 115, and devices above 120.

If these smaller companies are able to get this kinda performance out of these chip dacs for this kinda price why can't the larger companies with big financial backing get close or equal these dynamic and low distortion numbers in their mid and upper priced AVR's? Or any of their gear..is it a money thing, not cost effective?

Same reason car companies are diehards for old as heck chip nodes. It's gotten so bad that TSMC has said they're not going to be making older chips anymore for companies, and companies will have to move on to using 28nm at worst (keep in mind, you iPhone is running on 5nm chips by comparison, 28nm is basically a decade old now, and shithole car companies with their laggy ass car OS's still want to use chips as old as they can possibly source).

I'm too lazy to check out Mouser, but I think the CL and TI chips for example are to be had for cheaper than AKM and certainly cheaper than ESS. But I think it simply has to do with not having to hire a whole new team to learn how to implement things properly from a totally different manufacturer (and possibly because they get great deals from other manufacturers).

As for why companies don't do this in the AVR space, that's because most of the budget goes elsewhere (consumer DACs get absolutely obliterated by the DSP capabilities, and the I/O options AVR's come with, it's so bad in fact, whenever I see a DAC that has dual TOSLINK inputs, I call that a miracle, and then it gets quickly dashed because it's on a multi kilobuck device which I don't care about). AVR makers also don't take their customers to be a userbase that cares enough to educate themselves beyond brand hype and market penetration (and beyond subjective reviews online). And the last reason they don't change if they even know what a SINAD number even is - is because they don't think there's an audible difference worth considering. They're all in the same AVR industry, and all probably get pooled into a handful of manufacturers providing parts for them at a favorable price. Desktop DACs on the other hand, seemingly will NEVER have things like HDMI audio routing support, or any of the multitude of licensed tech AVRs must support.

As much as I take car tech progress to be a joke, I still have to understand that you're not going to be able to get the price Apple gets for their chips. In 2020, there were I think less than 15 million car sales in America. That's for the entire industry... Apple on the other hand, sells more than that many units per quarter.
 
Interesting suggestion. In such a graph, you wouldn't be able to see and identify the rest of the products. You are OK with that?
If there is a link to a full list elsewhere, then sure!
 
It's really great. However, this product has a clicking issue at the beginning when playing music files on the Tidal. I don't know why, but I hope it will be updated soon.

Good job bro
 
Last edited:
Good to see new products using AKM chips again!
 
Greetings Amir, I was wondering if you heard clicks/pops and if so what you have to say about them? I have one and really like it. The synergy is just great in my system as it is these days. Thanks.
 
Greetings Amir, I was wondering if you heard clicks/pops and if so what you have to say about them? I have one and really like it. The synergy is just great in my system as it is these days. Thanks.
I have not but will test for it when I get a chance.
 
Time to go logarithmic, perhaps?
;)
I think the compatibility of cel tels and desktop displays denotes some sort of limitations in graphing this out and keeping everybody happy campers while viewing all the information.
 
I think we need a new way to dislpay the ranking. Even at full size, the device names are getting hard to read :)

index.php


I vote for a histogram!
I agree. Maybe only show the relevant colour or say 25 on either side. As for the DAC itself... meh... another DAC that measures excellent under $200. ho hum. Although... the feature set seems to be above average here at this price point.
 
Must be some straightforward way to nest the data(?).
You know, bucket into groups of 5 or 10 or whatever (histogram), but hovering over (or clicking on) a bucket pops up the individual contents of that bucket.
 
Back
Top Bottom