• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Should you use Fletcher-Munson loudness compensation?

dshreter

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
794
Likes
1,226
514E992C-C398-43DB-9417-49A7695501BF.jpeg
I know many are familiar with the Fletcher-Munson or equal loudness curves. In a nutshell:

“The Fletcher Munson Curve contains a set of graphs that show that when you listen to music at a lower volume, mid-range frequencies will be sound more prominent, whereas high and low frequencies will be somewhat suppressed.

However, when the volume is increased, the reverse happens – high and low frequencies become more pronounced while the mid-range frequencies fade into the background.

In other words, the Fletcher Munson Curve demonstrates the average sensitivity of a human ear to audio signals of different frequencies at varying sound levels.”

I have a few questions about what this implies in practice.

Should you compensate for this in your own listening? I’m aware in psychoacoustics the brain naturally compensates for many things, so does fully adjusting for equal loudness compensation at low levels sound wrong or is it more similar to the intended mix? And in reference to music, what level is considered reference that you would compensate in relation to?

Given I tend to listen to music at lower volumes I am a bit lost on what to use as a target response curve for EQing my speakers. I could just do what sounds “best” but a little extra bass always sounds good for a little while so I don’t exactly trust my ears to get it right.
 

Doodski

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
20,752
Likes
20,771
Location
Canada
Hmmz... This partially explains why I crank up the PEQ high freq to the top stops and then crank the volume up. :D
 

rkbates

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Messages
137
Likes
151
Location
Down Under
Capture.JPG

Never measured it to see if it follows Fletcher-Munson exactly, but I've found a continuously variable loudness control very useful. Not very audiophile-like, and the position it ends up on varies from album to album (and day to day).
 

Doodski

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
20,752
Likes
20,771
Location
Canada
View attachment 176078
Never measured it to see if it follows Fletcher-Munson exactly, but I've found a continuously variable loudness control very useful. Not very audiophile-like, and the position it ends up on varies from album to album (and day to day).
I love the Yamaha variable loudness control. It's just well done. :D It can really transform a set of speakers into something else for awhile until the next setting comes down the pipe.
 

Doodski

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
20,752
Likes
20,771
Location
Canada
I used to climb the stage and adjust band's amplifiers during softer pieces, but now I'm getting too old for that ;)
You where one of those hard working people scurrying about under the lights performing service en route?
 
OP
dshreter

dshreter

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
794
Likes
1,226
It’s funny that there’s some decent consensus that loudness compensation is important but speakers aren’t built to an implied listening level. Or maybe they are. I don’t have data to back it up, but I suspect people that like high SPL gravitate to flat speakers more than those preferring moderate volumes.
 

MakeMineVinyl

Major Contributor
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
3,558
Likes
5,871
Location
Santa Fe, NM
I don't bother with loudness compensation on my 2nd system because it doesn't add anything much and sounds false.
 
OP
dshreter

dshreter

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
794
Likes
1,226
wow no one here has heard of Audyssey's Dynamic EQ or other schemes to implement equal loudness curve compensation for low level audio?
I think there is familiarity. Similar features are implemented in a lot of gear - some implementations better than others of course.

I guess my question is if you “should” use it, or if psychoacoustics already compensate for how it is meant to sound at higher or lower volumes.

The effect is profound, but I think very few systems are actually EQed as such. Even Dirac which gets a lot of praise I don’t think it supports a dynamic loudness function.
 

krabapple

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
3,169
Likes
3,717
Yes, you should use it

The equal loudness curve *is * psychoacoustics. Why would you think we somehow 'compensate' for it? It is a measurement of how we actually hear. You not only hear disproportionately less bass , you also perceive it so.

It is why loudness buttons were invented.
 
OP
dshreter

dshreter

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
794
Likes
1,226
Why would you think we somehow 'compensate' for it?
I’ve heard a lot of people state it sounds unnatural to them. Similar to how there’s an expectation of different sound in large vs small rooms, I could believe that equal loudness at lower levels sounds strange - in other words it might sound natural for music to be bass shy if it quiet.

But I don’t know either way which is why I wanted POVs.
 

levimax

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
2,349
Likes
3,462
Location
San Diego
If I am listening very low at night I turn up the bass and it sounds better to me. If listening way louder than usual I turn the bass down a little and it again sounds better to me. For these adjustment I find tone controls better than equalizers or filters.
 

rkbates

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 24, 2020
Messages
137
Likes
151
Location
Down Under
Yes, you should use it

The equal loudness curve *is * psychoacoustics. Why would you think we somehow 'compensate' for it? It is a measurement of how we actually hear. You not only hear disproportionately less bass , you also perceive it so.

It is why loudness buttons were invented.
I expect there is a big variation in implementation, however the loudness button on a Denon PMA520-AE is exactly (measured) the same as winding up the bass and treble to the max. The 'button' approach seems pretty rough, and I'm not overly keen on letting software automatically apply compensation. I'm sure my random knob fiddling is far better than expert engineers spending years of research perfecting an software solution;)
 

abdo123

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
7,425
Likes
7,941
Location
Brussels, Belgium
Can someone share some layman level article with the necessary knowledge to build a loudness filter?

I typically listen at 75dBSPL = 0dBFS and i'm wondering whether i'm missing out on something.
 

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
15,891
Likes
35,912
Location
The Neitherlands
I made this a while ago.

f-m-overlayed.png


Most recordings are mixed at average levels between 80 and 85dB (depending on the size of the mixing room and other factors)
I have 'normalized' 80 dB equal loudness contour and then you can see what 'compensation' you would need when you listen to different average levels.
Determining what average level you actually listen to is another matter.

I would say just apply EQ based on the right plot with your average SPL and the 80dB reference. When this sounds better to you and your speakers/headphones are correctly tuned this should work.

It is not by chance that my target curve is matching the 70dB line. I too listen at average levels (active listening) between 70 and 75dB average and well made recordings sound good to me on this target.
 
Last edited:

levimax

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 28, 2018
Messages
2,349
Likes
3,462
Location
San Diego
Can someone share some layman level article with the necessary knowledge to build a loudness filter?

I typically listen at 75dBSPL = 0dBFS and i'm wondering whether i'm missing out on something.
@solderdude has excellent information for building a digital filter. Traditionally a Baxandall analog filter was used i.e. tone controls. See project 7 for how to build one using op amps https://sound-au.com/dwopa2.htm
 

sarumbear

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Messages
7,604
Likes
7,314
Location
UK
View attachment 176066I know many are familiar with the Fletcher-Munson or equal loudness curves. In a nutshell:

“The Fletcher Munson Curve contains a set of graphs that show that when you listen to music at a lower volume, mid-range frequencies will be sound more prominent, whereas high and low frequencies will be somewhat suppressed.

However, when the volume is increased, the reverse happens – high and low frequencies become more pronounced while the mid-range frequencies fade into the background.

In other words, the Fletcher Munson Curve demonstrates the average sensitivity of a human ear to audio signals of different frequencies at varying sound levels.”

I have a few questions about what this implies in practice.

Should you compensate for this in your own listening? I’m aware in psychoacoustics the brain naturally compensates for many things, so does fully adjusting for equal loudness compensation at low levels sound wrong or is it more similar to the intended mix? And in reference to music, what level is considered reference that you would compensate in relation to?

Given I tend to listen to music at lower volumes I am a bit lost on what to use as a target response curve for EQing my speakers. I could just do what sounds “best” but a little extra bass always sounds good for a little while so I don’t exactly trust my ears to get it right.
The question is wrong. It should be should we go back to 60s understanding of music reproduction?
 

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
2,920
Likes
3,834
Can someone share some layman level article with the necessary knowledge to build a loudness filter?
I has to be built-into the volume control circuit or the volume-control software. A basic loudness compensation circuit doesn't "know" the signal level or the acoustic loudness. It only knows the volume control setting. Variable loudness compensation helps you to adjust for that but it's still "imperfect". With software you can calibrate to the acoustic loudness, to some extent. (But you don't want to adjust dynamically to quiet passages, just for lower than expected listening levels.)

I found this. It's rather simple, just boosting the bass and there's no bypass switch. I think the old analog designs normally used a special volume control pot with an extra tap that could be switched-in. But I've never seen a pot like that available to hobbyists.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom