dtaylo1066
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2019
- Messages
- 753
- Likes
- 1,011
Some impressive iron in their.
Ca. 2015 RMAF: Bryston and eXasound had a multi-channel display, 4.0 IIRC. I heard that demo and it was frankly fantastic (no financial interest.)Brystons are particularly known to pair well with Maggies. New ones are pretty pricey, but with 20 year warranties, older models can be purchased used and still be covered under factory warranty.
In other words, it's capable of higher output power.I was hoping for a measured review. I found the TYR fantastic on everything. Bass, mids , dynamic, soundstage. Even without my subs the bass was better than before. I’ve heard other owners compare it to amps costing much more.
What amps "costing much more?" I would highly appreciate links. Tx!I was hoping for a measured review. I found the TYR fantastic on everything. Bass, mids , dynamic, soundstage. Even without my subs the bass was better than before. I’ve heard other owners compare it to amps costing much more.
The Tyrs are probably priced well, but Amir reviewed the Outlaw models 2200 and 2220 (newer), which are monoblocks, and they were both outstanding. They are rated by the manufacturer at 200 W into 8 ohms and 300 W into 4 ohms. Two of them are priced at $700. can't see why that would be a worse deal.What amps "costing much more?" I would highly appreciate links. Tx!
The answer, I think, is the direct-to-consumer sales model. If the sales price is $3200, it seems reasonable to think that a pair could be produced at a cost of $1600.How the heck does Schiit make a quality 50+# amp here, with CRPS/choke reg. PS and sell it for $3200/pr? That just doesn't seem possible; it seems like the minimum price would be about double that.
What controls will you use for the comparison?I'll report back the differences I hear with my 1.7i
...that would be shocking.Purchased an AHB2 instead of the Tyrs months ago. Now that there was a sale recently, I decided to try out the Tyrs too. I'll report back the differences I hear with my 1.7i. I suspect I'll be happy enough to want to sell the AHB2.
Why? Tyr has roughly twice the power of the ABH2 unless you have 2 ABH2’s bridged. If the 1.7i’s want more power because they are inefficient- and they are inefficient, the Tyr will likely win that contest. The ABH2 measurements are incredibly good, but in the real world- will you hear the better measurements or lack of clipping? Turcoda will be able to make judgments because of having both to compare....that would be shocking.
Why? Tyr has roughly twice the power of the ABH2 unless you have 2 ABH2’s bridged. If the 1.7i’s want more power because they are inefficient- and they are inefficient, the Tyr will likely win that contest. The ABH2 measurements are incredibly good, but in the real world- will you hear the better measurements or lack of clipping? Turcoda will be able to make judgments because of having both to compare.
People often confuse detail with insufficient bass foundation. The 1.7i's sound terrific but they miss the low bass without some subwoofer help. That being said - there is the low efficiency of Magnapans which likes power to "come alive". Perhaps the additional headroom of the Tyr is the differentiator.I just wanted to add that making a conclusion about perceived details is quite tricky here between the two amps. Does the AHB2 sound sharper than the Tyrs? Yes, definitely. But is there more detail in one over the other? I don't actually know yet. If you just do a super quick comparison between the two it sounds like the AHB2 would most definitely have more detail. But if you listen longer you notice that there's nothing missing from the Tyrs, and that sharpness is just how the AHB2 presents things. Its just a tad bit difficult to conclude one way or the other.
Hum... That's weird:Review from Stereophile
Schiit Audio Tyr monoblock power amplifier
www.stereophile.com