DesertHawk
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2022
- Messages
- 56
- Likes
- 106
If you're already committed to strictly MC or MM, I'd be very tempted by Michael Fidler's stuff
I am waiting on an AMIRM test of the MM.If you're already committed to strictly MC or MM, I'd be very tempted by Michael Fidler's stuff
I think a puffin would be fun to have. The waxwing, IMHO, made a design flaw in having all controls be done via an app. I get so frustrated with streaming or Bluetooth apps. Plus, one of the biggest advantages to vinyl for me is the "analog experience" - I'm not talking about the sonic differences between analog and digital music, I mean the experience of being about to flip through a catalog of music without looking at screen. My day has too many screens already.Parks Audio Puffin - or it's current successor, the waxwing.
Mainly for it's "Magic" function (digital filtering of pops/clicks)
Puffin makes you change things at the device. Waxwing lets you make changes from couch potato position. App makes Bluetooth connection pretty much instantly when opening the app. Imagine that, a Bluetooth connection with no dancing around. It simply works.I think a puffin would be fun to have. The waxwing, IMHO, made a design flaw in having all controls be done via an app. I get so frustrated with streaming or Bluetooth apps. Plus, one of the biggest advantages to vinyl for me is the "analog experience" - I'm not talking about the sonic differences between analog and digital music, I mean the experience of being about to flip through a catalog of music without looking at screen. My day has too many screens already.
So, out of the phone pre’s Amir has reviewed, ignoring the cost, which one would you use if it were free?
My brain wants the say the Skoll, but it seems like they all have some shortcomings.
The whole line from Spartan 5 to Spartan 15 to MM Pro looks to be very thoughtfully designed. The design notes for the Spartan 15 remind me of the gain architecture of the Bryston BP-2, which is far more expensive using discrete components. I am disturbed by the number of people who report balance and noise problems with the Skoll.If you're already committed to strictly MC or MM, I'd be very tempted by Michael Fidler's stuff
And I do not care about (sit in a chair with an APP: PERIOD)The whole line from Spartan 5 to Spartan 15 to MM Pro looks to be very thoughtfully designed. The design notes for the Spartan 15 remind me of the gain architecture of the Bryston BP-2, which is far more expensive using discrete components. I am disturbed by the number of people who report balance and noise problems with the Skoll.
If you have a balanced preamp and power Amp then you have to go from balanced to unbalanced at some point, right? I don't know if there are pros/cons to doing that in the phono stage rather than in the preamp.This product cracks me up. Most good carts/table setups have fixed RCA's, so adding unbal to bal with loads of wiring and chips when the original design was through a simple RIAA filter w proper gain, hoping the gizmo adds as little artifacts as possible
Sure, but home audio gear without RCA line in for Phonos is unusual. Turntables like 2 of the Project models do have a proprietary balanced out (along with standard RCAs), but to get XLR out of them is a $200 cable add on. Amir states that computer noise generates makes balanced Turntables a good idea. Would love to see measurements on that, and what kind of computer gear folks are plugging in that XLR balanced cancels out.If you have a balanced preamp and power Amp then you have to go from balanced to unbalanced at some point, right? I don't know if there are pros/cons to doing that in the phono stage rather than in the preamp.
I don't have a computer in my audio system (but I can set up a Bluetooth transceiver that I have along with a Bluetooth receiver at the stereo 50 ft. away & send whatever audio (from whatever source) that my computer is playing into the stereo through a line in. It will not be receiving computer noise due to the computer not being in the system.Sure, but home audio gear without RCA line in for Phonos is unusual. Turntables like 2 of the Project models do have a proprietary balanced out (along with standard RCAs), but to get XLR out of them is a $200 cable add on. Amir states that computer noise generates makes balanced Turntables a good idea. Would love to see measurements on that, and what kind of computer gear folks are plugging in that XLR balanced cancels out.
Pretty much any turntable can be wired for balanced output. You just need some skill an know how.
A cartridge has a + and a - terminal, neither of which is referenced to ground. So all cartridges have - essentially - balanced output. You just need to wire the + and - leads coming out of the tonearm to an XLR socket. You'll have to mount the XLr socket in some way, requires a few simple tools and mechanical aptitude.
XLR PIN CONNECT TO
1 Turntable ground (same connection you would connect to the ground screw on the back of a typical phono preamp - this is connected to the arm tube and sometimes to the turntable cassis)
2 + output pin of the phono cartridge
3 - output pin of the phono cartridge
You'll need TWO such XLR sockets, one for the LEFT channel and one for the RIGHT channel.
It's a very good idea to use balanced connections for something with as low a signal voltage as a phono cartridge. It's much like a microphone in terms of signal level, and there is a good reason that professional audio - recording studios, live venues, etc - ALWAYS use balanced connections for microphones. There's no reason those same benefits can't be enjoyed by people listening to vinyl.
Of course, it's kind of moot to try to reduce noise and distortion in a phono setup, as the medium itself -vinyl - has abysmal SINAD. But, if you want to try to improve it to be as good as it COULD be (which admittedly isn't very good) then by all means go with balanced.
I enjoy mine. I connects my SL1200 (on RCA) out to my Pre on XLR. Now all but 1 of my sources (old fancy Sony ES CD) go xlr into the pre.
Lots of easy to change parameters for different cartridges.
Yes, the SINAD is much lower for vinyl than digital. But, I certainly still enjoy the vinyl nonetheless.Of course, it's kind of moot to try to reduce noise and distortion in a phono setup, as the medium itself -vinyl - has abysmal SINAD.
Me too. And I do not know many people that have a need to run the RCA type phono cable more than a few feet (which should have only minimal, if any impact on noise).Yes, the SINAD is much lower for vinyl than digital. But, I certainly still enjoy the vinyl nonetheless.