- Thread Starter
- #101
It works and is simple to use. The drawback is the cost. Stereo version for PC costs $600 from what I recall.So, what's the verdict from you who are using Dirac Live?
It works and is simple to use. The drawback is the cost. Stereo version for PC costs $600 from what I recall.So, what's the verdict from you who are using Dirac Live?
why didn't you limit that range in the "Range" tab (lower right corner of your graph)?
It works and is simple to use. The drawback is the cost. Stereo version for PC costs $600 from what I recall.
That controls the zoom of the display, not the filter calculation.
And you can't limit the filter calculation via settings? In that case you can maybe delete the samples you don't need from the measurement file.
Sorry, I have reached (maybe already overreached) the limit of my knowledge of this subject.
---
Side note: One reason I didn't buy Dirac for the OpenDRC-DI because it prevents experimentation with other tools like rePhase due to the different firmware that gets installed in the device. I don't know the details.
Were you able to solve that curve with the AcourateDRC?
I haven't tried convolving the Acourate Filter with a filter with a manual adjustment, to see what happens.
I'm pretty sure 4096 taps should be enough to do it, even at 96kHz.
I you are doing phase corrections only you can try setting windowing to "rectangular" and centering to "energy" and see if it helps.
Back in the real world, I want to twist the phase in the area of 45 to 55Hz +90 degrees in one channel, and -90 degrees in the other, as an experiment to see what happens to my deep hole in that area.
You need to measure one speaker at a time to avoid comb filtering effects between the two correlated sources.
That sudden drop is not normal unless that is what you have inserted in the audio path.Guys, why is this phase graph so odd? This was taken with my notebook mic when the notebook was practically between the speakers. Is it normal for such lousy measurement?