- Joined
- Feb 23, 2016
- Messages
- 23,430
- Likes
- 43,801
So why did Schiit pick a 20 bit DAC for their flagship?Thank you, very interesting yet 24 bit PCM2704 beating 20 bit DACs isn't overly surprising.
So why did Schiit pick a 20 bit DAC for their flagship?Thank you, very interesting yet 24 bit PCM2704 beating 20 bit DACs isn't overly surprising.
That's a good point. Alas, the selectively becomes poor with flat top and lobing gets excessive, making the graph look well, offensive if you get my drift![]()
I wonder if the lack of symmetry of the ‘balls’ is audible ... , maybe I will start a new thread on this.That's a good point. Alas, the selectively becomes poor with flat top and lobing gets excessive, making the graph look well, offensive if you get my drift
View attachment 13543
Courious; what audio equipment do you listen to? And are your choices solely based on measurements? TIASigh.
So why did Schiit pick a 20 bit DAC for their flagship?
ok you post it somewhere else. TIAHow about if we stay on topic?
No, not for audio.
Okay fine for some reason, other than performance, they picked a non-audio 20 bit DAC. That makes your complaint about Amir comparing his 23 or 24 bit DAC to a 20 bit DAC moot. Their DAC choice has put limitations on their performance. That is part of design. Don't make design choices that result in sub-par performance. Especially if that design is intended as your top of the line, flagship product.I suspect that for whatever subjective, business or nostalgic reason they wanted to have a multibit DAC in their portfolio, I haven't checked, but are 20+ bit multibit DAC chips still in production today?
Could the reason be marketing? By using a non audio DAC they try to position against other manufacturers using proprietary designs.Okay fine for some reason, other than performance, they picked a non-audio 20 bit DAC. That makes your complaint about Amir comparing his 23 or 24 bit DAC to a 20 bit DAC moot. Their DAC choices has put limitations on their performance. That is part of design. Don't make design choices that result in sub-par performance. Especially if that design is intended as your top of the line, flagship product.
Yet another Yaggi lovefest:
https://www.cnet.com/news/the-best-...l-audio-converter/#ftag=rss.audiophiliac.ftag
Or is it a Schitt storm?
Could the reason be marketing? By using a non audio DAC they try to position against other manufacturers using proprietary designs.
I believe he is stating what he is hearing.
Same with the "closed-form" supermegacombullschiit filter stuff. It doesn't even have as many filter taps as a baby Chord!If you ask me the marketing is all that company has going for it. The idea they are doing different stuff than others.
Okay fine for some reason, other than performance, they picked a non-audio 20 bit DAC. That makes your complaint about Amir comparing his 23 or 24 bit DAC to a 20 bit DAC moot. Their DAC choice has put limitations on their performance. That is part of design. Don't make design choices that result in sub-par performance. Especially if that design is intended as your top of the line, flagship product.
(Source)April 21, 2015, Valencia, CA. The new Yggdrasil DAC from Schiit Audio is an entirely different take on "end-game" DAC design, eschewing the now-standard delta-sigma and DSD-optimized architectures to deliver optimal performance for the 99.99% of recorded music out there—music in PCM format.
"Yggdrasil was designed with a single goal in mind: to give you the most from the music you already have," said Mike Moffat, Co-Founder of Schiit Audio.
That is not what their website says:(Source)
While I now have quite a few albums with 24 bits, and more than 44.1 kHz, if I take into account my CDs from earlier days, and Spotify, the majority of the music I listen to is indeed 16 bit / 44.1 kHz. That's what the Yggdrasil is primarily designed for, rather than DSD, MQA or what have you.
Are internal components/design causing the power supply noise you are measuring?That is not what their website says:
View attachment 13565
Did they ever verify the DAC produces 21 bits?
Their latest advertising now claims they even do better than 24 bits (140 dBFS): https://audiosciencereview.com/foru...-yggdrasil-ads-on-stereophile-may-issue.2633/
View attachment 13566
The own ad says that is wrong given the strong power supply spikes that rise above the main tone let alone the rest of the noise/distortion:
![]()
The company claims here are quite obvious and unfortunately quite misleading at best, and false at worst.
Those weren't my measurements.Are internal components/design causing the power supply noise you are measuring?