It appears the not yet released new Google Nest Mini may be a suitable ChromeCast Audio Replacement.
But it has a mic and requires Internet connenctivity?
It appears the not yet released new Google Nest Mini may be a suitable ChromeCast Audio Replacement.
I believe the original CCA also requires internet connectivity (although their may be some server work-around I do not know about).
If the new Mini is like the old, there will be a physical switch to turn off the mic.
But, I like being able to mute, skip, pause, and go to tracks with voice commands. I am also very boring and do not think anything I say would be of interest to Google's minions
How do you do that? A quick google search indicated it needed access to servers. Is there a trick involved? Do you need a 3rd party server like Plex?Only if you play from a streaming souce on the net. I run a CCA that is completely isolated from the Internet.
Of course, its on the back of the current mini.Have you physically verified that?
How do you do that? A quick google search indicated it needed access to servers. Is there a trick involved? Do you need a 3rd party server like Plex?
Of course, its on the back of the current mini.
......And you traced the circuitry?
Short of an Aurender or Linn box, what can I do?
I would but I don't think Audirvana will play nice with CCA, as CCA apparently requires AirPlay. At this point it seems only a Raspberry Pi will do what I want. Hard to believe.If you want to keep it inexpensive but still competent, I'd use the CCA with a mini-toslink (optical) cable into the DAC if it'll accept it. It'll be bit perfect up to and including 24/96:
I would but I don't think Audirvana will play nice with CCA
Great suggestion, thanks! I looked at the website. It sounds like I'd be replacing Audirvana with Emby. Do you know, will Audirvana still be controlling the bitstream?
Great suggestion, thanks! I looked at the website. It sounds like I'd be replacing Audirvana with Emby. Do you know, will Audirvana still be controlling the bitstream?
When I tested it in 2016, I did my first run using a computer to supply power. SNR was -85dBA with 16 bit audio. So I redid it using the included PS. It jumped to -97dBA. When I used 24 bit signals, it scored better than -104dBA.
"I decided to run my CCA analog into a Klipsch PowerGate as the DAC on the latter isn't the best. It does sound better to my ears this way; there's a clarity to the sound that I don't recall hearing before - yeah, that's subjective but I think the performance measurements indicate that I would hear this."
Hi BillG, I know this post was awhile ago but I also have a CCA and Klipsch Powergate. You mentioned you thought you heard better audio quality from the Analog Out of the CCA into the Analog In of the Klipsch. Did you try the digital OUT on CCA to digital IN on Klipsch? Were you using a browser or an app?
I ask because I'm curious after reading on this site that the digital OUT on CCA being better quality than the Analog OUT (and yes, I also read that Klipsch DAC isn't the best) which of the two weaknesses in the system CCA-Klipsch is the lesser of 2 evils: CCADO-KDI/CCAAO-KAI.
Since I have a turntable connected thru Analog IN to my Klipsch I didn't have a chance to test the CCAAO-KAI in my system. I use the Hi-Fi Cast app from my Chromebook and phone to the CCADO-KDI and I think it sounds really good. After reading your comment I might try switching to analog and listen for a difference.
Thanks for any information you can provide
I ask because I'm curious after reading on this site that the digital OUT on CCA being better quality than the Analog OUT (and yes, I also read that Klipsch DAC isn't the best) which of the two weaknesses in the system CCA-Klipsch is the lesser of 2 evils: CCADO-KDI/CCAAO-KAI.