Pearljam5000
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
- Messages
- 5,961
- Likes
- 6,669
- Thread Starter
- #1,741
Some info from the manual
Yepi. I use the rule of thumb 1ms = 1ft. So maybe in a big room wider dispersion sounds good and gives “envelopment” but what about a domestic listening room? I’ll take narrow dispersion in that situation any day.When the reflection comes in the first 10ms the brain adds it to the main signal and it colours the sound. 10ms that's 3,3m extra path what you need for your reflection (e.g. 2,5m direct path from speaker to ear, reflection needs to travel 5,8m or more)
You NEVER have this in smaller roome and not possible with a normal height ceiling! That's the reason live recording rooms are high and big - you need to delay the reflections for that spacious sound.
I think they like absorption/diffusion. That way the sound goes all over the place and has different length paths. They say let that be about -10db down.Will there be a subjective difference between absorbed reflections and no reflections?
A lot of studios put main monitors into the corner (mounted on a baffle wall) so that sound cannot possibly reflect off the side walls (with less than 45 degree dispersion speakers). That's also what B&O goes for with their narrow mode and constant directivity.
I wish they published this for the 8351/8361
Looks like they won at the Namm TEC Awards as well:
SorryDamn…..I came here to post that ^……late to the party yet again
Not like wilson consumers care, wilson does what their target customers desireThese look like what the WattPuppy could be if only Wilson knew what the fuck they were doing.
Indeed - Wilson knows exactly what they're doing. Selling overbuilt (the word "overengineered" doesn't really apply) wacky-looking, expensive speakers that have a (I assume) pleasant-but-colored response that ticks the right boxes for their rich clientele.Not like wilson consumers care, wilson does what their target customers desire
Wilson has done an amazing job positioning their products from a marketing perspective. In truth I’ve only ever heard some Sasha’s in a home space. They really are unbelievably beautiful looking and sound quite good. They are your girlfriend’s 3k Gucci handbag. Expensive in the most desirable way. I tend to be more practical but they look the part for sure.Indeed - Wilson knows exactly what they're doing. Selling overbuilt (the word "overengineered" doesn't really apply) wacky-looking, expensive speakers that have a (I assume) pleasant-but-colored response that ticks the right boxes for their rich clientele.
Maybe Wilson is smarter than Genelec in that regard. They're charging just as much for giant weird-looking speakers (sometimes more) and they don't even have to do a bunch of boring math and simulations to design them.
I don't really disagree... haven't heard any but I think they look awesome in the way an impractical sports car or something looks awesome. And I imagine they sound nice, just doubt they "measure well" in every aspect like the Genelecs would. So I was not really joking, I think they know what they're doing, but they are not playing the same game that Genelec is playing.Wilson has done an amazing job positioning their products from a marketing perspective. In truth I’ve only ever heard some Sasha’s in a home space. They really are unbelievably beautiful looking and sound quite good. They are your girlfriend’s 3k Gucci handbag. Expensive in the most desirable way. I tend to be more practical but they look the part for sure.
HiIndeed - Wilson knows exactly what they're doing. Selling overbuilt (the word "overengineered" doesn't really apply) wacky-looking, expensive speakers that have a (I assume) pleasant-but-colored response that ticks the right boxes for their rich clientele.
Maybe Wilson is smarter than Genelec in that regard. They're charging just as much for giant weird-looking speakers (sometimes more) and they don't even have to do a bunch of boring math and simulations to design them.