• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

MQA entering into administration - comparable to Chapter 11 in the US

Status
Not open for further replies.

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,471
Likes
24,922
So that's why I can't tolerate FM radio anymore.
Well... in many markets and on many stations, I think that there may be... umm... confounding variables. ;):rolleyes::facepalm:

I ran this through the Google translator with this result

"Things are going so well that we decided yo go into bankruptcy."
Well of course. They like a challenge. ;)
 

Atanasi

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
718
Likes
798
I wonder why such a company would have 4 million pound in yearly costs? They are not making anything physical, they won’t need a vast army of software developers… maybe they have a large legal department…? ;)
Promotional costs including gifts to their partners?
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,225
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
Promotional costs including gifts to their partners?
Yes, I suspect they were pumping money out of the company in anticipation of failure.
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,446
Likes
18,488
Location
Netherlands
Yes, I suspect they were pumping money out of the company in anticipation of failure.
I think this kind of spending was going on for years. It’s also amazing how little money actually came in…. Amazing in bad way ;)
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,225
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
I think this kind of spending was going on for years. It’s also amazing how little money actually came in…. Amazing in bad way ;)
Well, being a cynical man, I think a lot of these types of tech companies are run anticipating failure. As long as the management makes out like bandits, they walk away whistling with money falling out of their pockets.
 

earlevel

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Nov 18, 2020
Messages
567
Likes
791
out of curiosity how much larger is a comparable flac file vs mqa file of the same song?
From John Siau (IS MQA DOA?):

When fully decoded, the resolution of MQA is limited to 17 bits at 96 kHz. Miska has shown that an MQA file actually occupies more space than a lossless 96 kHz 18-bit PCM file!

Note the link to the Miska tests.
 

Avp1

Active Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2022
Messages
216
Likes
189
From John Siau (IS MQA DOA?):

When fully decoded, the resolution of MQA is limited to 17 bits at 96 kHz. Miska has shown that an MQA file actually occupies more space than a lossless 96 kHz 18-bit PCM file!

Note the link to the Miska tests.

But 18/96 Flac cannot be played on standard CD player.
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,446
Likes
18,488
Location
Netherlands
But 18/96 Flac cannot be played on standard CD player.
Nor can any other flac file… why care about CD players anyway?
 
Last edited:

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,280
Likes
17,099
Location
Central Fl
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
It was nothing but a snake-oil type money grab from the beginning.
Design a processing that makes extremely minor change in sound, claim it makes an improvement
that removes 'deblur-shit" from the original recording and get tons of folks to believe it. :mad:
 

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,780
Likes
242,499
Location
Seattle Area
I wonder why such a company would have 4 million pound in yearly costs? They are not making anything physical, they won’t need a vast army of software developers… maybe they have a large legal department…? ;)
I suspect they are doing all the MQA encodings. This takes staff to ingest, encode and QA. Probably 2 to 3 people for that plus equipment, rent, etc. Then you need business development people to convince chip/device makers to implement MQA. And yes, you do need lawyers (inside or outside the company) to negotiate licenses. And executives to run the thing. $6M would be pretty low to run such an operation actually.
 

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,780
Likes
242,499
Location
Seattle Area
OK, so here's where I differ. And why now I'm a lot more concerned about MQA than I have been in the past.
Technology is secondary when it comes to getting a format adopted. MP3 rose to nearly 100% domination even though AAC at the time produced much better performance.
That's what it has become for now, but it's way, way more. Inside a 24/96 FLAC format or similar, it has space to be properly lossless. It could be put into a 32 bit container, making it absolutely lossless for 24 bit audio. It doesn't have to preserve a compatible section for playback on older devices at all.
Well, in that case you can just encode the 24 bit as is in FLAC and be done with it. Wait! It is already done that way. :)

The challenge with MQA is that it has to dither its side-channel data. That randomization causes FLAC lossless encoding efficiency to reduce. So what it gained in coding efficiency (not encoding all of ultrasonics and bit depth of noise), it gave back part of it in this stage. I don't think they thought this through at the start.
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,446
Likes
18,488
Location
Netherlands
I suspect they are doing all the MQA encodings. This takes staff to ingest, encode and QA. Probably 2 to 3 people for that plus equipment, rent, etc.
I highly doubt this. Why would you want to do this yourself? Also given Goldensounds story I don’t think they do it themselves. Besides, those people don’t need to be highly skilled, so won’t be very expensive either.
Then you need business development people to convince chip/device makers to implement MQA.
Well, they can’t have gotten big bonuses… ;)
And yes, you do need lawyers (inside or outside the company) to negotiate licenses. And executives to run the thing.
If it were the executives poring in the extra money, they probably didn’t get that much in return.
$6M would be pretty low to run such an operation actually.
I beg to differ.
 
Last edited:

Spocko

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 27, 2019
Messages
1,621
Likes
3,001
Location
Southern California
... You're buying inaudible numbers.
THIS.. and it applies to hardware too! DAC companies should stop trying to win the SINAD wars because we're paying for inaudible accomplishments. Let's put all those engineering resources into UI specialists to improve control knobs, software stability or add some room correction DSP/EQ, etc.
 

ribonucleic

Active Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2023
Messages
215
Likes
230
While some of you were predicting that MQA would wipe out in the clear PCM, and labels were out to convert your music to DRM, I kept saying none of this was true. That MQA simply lacked any kind of leverage to make your fears come true.

I resent anyone who tries to steal from me, even if they have no chance of success.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom