How does Fremer afford $320,000 Wilson speaker sets? Is he independently wealthy or does Stereophile pay that good?
You've either not read much here or this is a wonderful parody. I laughed out loud.So, to us golden ears, I like the idea of this forum to quantify the stuff we (think) we hear. I have "heard" cables from Radio Shack magnet wire with packing tape (which I built, liked and an objective person liked) to 5 nines silver on air dielectric I also built and like. I really would like to see this quantified which is THIS FORUM. I read stereophile about air. I have heard air. Love it. Want it measured so I can make it happen on purpose instead of 20 years, 3 custom built listening studios and 4 other purchased studios. Thanks to Sterophile for the marketing and serious ears and to the science community for quantifying and advancing the state of the art and science.
Good question.How does Fremer afford $320,000 Wilson speaker sets? Is he independently wealthy or does Stereophile pay that good?
How does Fremer afford $320,000 Wilson speaker sets? Is he independently wealthy or does Stereophile pay that good?
Not to the main point, but I recall when a pair of Klipschorns were approximately $1000, early 70s. They were the end of the hi-fi "rainbow" to me and that seem like a HUGE amount of money at the time.Good question.
I spent a lot of time over the last three days pouring over old issues of High Fidelity:
HIGH FIDELITY - Consumer audio and music magazine (worldradiohistory.com)
I was looking mostly at the years 1964-1971, the years of the Beatles. High Fidelity really didn't like them. That's another issue for another time. But something else I noticed during those years: audio gear being affordable was advertised as a good thing. Lots of the advertisements emphasized the value of the gear, low prices were regarded as a virtue back in those days. The under $100 loudspeaker was the norm, a $300 loudspeaker was considered a luxury item. If something like $1000 a pair would be the top in 1967, that "top" translates to slightly under $8000 today. I think we are in the "gilded age" of high-end audio. And, having heard some really expensive gear undermined in some acoustically hopeless rooms, I do have to wonder what 1/3 of a million dollars worth of loudspeakers is doing in Mikey's messy mancave.
Real dodgy sounding, those. Also, you really need an auditorium---ok, I'm exaggerating, but you do need a much larger than average room for the sound to cohere. I recall a dude who made "high-end" interconnect and cable, had a pair of those monsters in a tiny room, just a total mess sonically.Not to the main point, but I recall when a pair of Klipschorns were approximately $1000, early 70s. They were the end of the hi-fi "rainbow" to me and that seem like a HUGE amount of money at the time.
Real dodgy sounding, those. Also, you really need an auditorium---ok, I'm exaggerating, but you do need a much larger than average room for the sound to cohere. I recall a dude who made "high-end" interconnect and cable, had a pair of those monsters in a tiny room, just a total mess sonically.
In 1973 I got my first system, Acoustic Research 3's, AR amp and Turntable, Shure 91e cartridge. The speakers were used, the total was about $700. Good sounding system, but too much for my bedroom. I was 18 when I got it , still living at home.
I've owned 4 separate pairs of Advent speakers, two of the Large [first in the 70's, later in the 1990's], one of the small [1970's, very sweet with the Fisher 500C] and one outdoor pair [2010's], made long after Jensen acquired their company. Used those in the car. I remember visiting Jason Serinus before he was a scribe for Stereophile, had a wonderful system where the speakers were large Advents, did wonders with the vocal music he cherishes. Mine never sounded as good. I suspect the room he had them in and the odd placement he deployed were big factors in their sound quality.My first system was a Technics belt-drive cheapie turntable with an Ortofon cartridge, a Kenwood integrated amp and separate tuner, and a pair of Advent loudspeakers. I think it was about $350 for all of it in 1977--and it was (and still is) quite listenable.
The main advances in those days were at the affordable end of the spectrum, once good solid-state amps came along. Difficult speaker loads weren't our problem in those days.
We thought of Klipsh as party speakers, like big JBL's and Cerwin Vegas. The Advents were in the AR acoustic suspension tradition, of course. The 40-watt Kenwood was more than enough for a dorm room, even with 86 dB/w/m. Loud rather than clean, but then we were into what is now called prog rock, plus classical.
Rick "still listens to prog rock and classical" Denney
No, you got it. Glad you enjoyed. I have built those cables thoughYou've either not read much here or this is a wonderful parody. I laughed out loud.
Gotcha. Way back in the later 80s when I first was subscribing to Stereophile (pretty sure it was them and not Speaker Builder), "Sam Tellig" in his Audio Cheapskate (Audiophile Cheapskate? Don't recall.) monthly column talked about RS solid core hook-up wire and how great doing twisted pairs for speaker cables. I promptly ordered some gold plated spade lugs from someplace advertising in Speaker Builder and ran down to the local RS and bought a spool of black and a spool of red solid core hook up wire. I then spent a couple evenings putting together about 10' runs. I then hooked my speakers up with and promptly convinced myself they sounded better than the 12 gauge stranded wire I'd been using. We moved not long after that, but during the interim I decided I could not really hear any difference. After moving I set my hi-fi back up with the old 12 gauge as it was far easier to use (not as stiff). I've used that ever since, though the equipment has changed over the years.No, you got it. Glad you enjoyed. I have built those cables though
Radio Shack magnet wire and clear packing tape just did not hold up well. Air? Who doesn't want that.
Outstanding! I braided, same time, same reason. Ended up buying someone's leftover KimberCable 8 TC, bi-amped and still use them. Air-I finally got a room setup and the sound left the speakers. Thought it broke at first. Never messed with equipment again. Band was in the room.Gotcha. Way back in the later 80s when I first was subscribing to Stereophile (pretty sure it was them and not Speaker Builder), "Sam Tellig" in his Audio Cheapskate (Audiophile Cheapskate? Don't recall.) monthly column talked about RS solid core hook-up wire and how great doing twisted pairs for speaker cables. I promptly ordered some gold plated spade lugs from someplace advertising in Speaker Builder and ran down to the local RS and bought a spool of black and a spool of red solid core hook up wire. I then spent a couple evenings putting together about 10' runs. I then hooked my speakers up with and promptly convinced myself they sounded better than the 12 gauge stranded wire I'd been using. We moved not long after that, but during the interim I decided I could not really hear any difference. After moving I set my hi-fi back up with the old 12 gauge as it was far easier to use (not as stiff). I've used that ever since, though the equipment has changed over the years.
For less money than those speakers cost you can get this;How does Fremer afford $320,000 Wilson speaker sets? Is he independently wealthy or does Stereophile pay that good?
Ten Signs that you may be suffering from Audiophilus Nervosa, the neurotic behavior of the self-described "Audiophile":
#1: You have a box full of line level interconnects but can only use two pair at any given time.
#2: You have multiple LP copies of the same title, being wrapped up in the search for "The Perfect Copy".
#3: You have, at one time or another, used a green marker on your CDs or attached "rings" to said CDs, and can hear the difference.
#4: You have adjusted VTA on your tonearm so many times, you have worn out the screws.
#5: You are "into" swapping tubes.
#6: You have "Upgraded" your electronic gear with "High-End" passive parts.
#7: You have a re-clocking device between your digital source and your DAC, and the DAC set you back $10,000.00
#8: There are scratch marks all over your floor from constantly re-positioning your heavy floorstanding speakers.
#9: You KNOW LPs sound better.
#10: You get into a pointless argument on ASR and then get blocked.
I've been reading old issues of High Fidelity and Stereo Review at RADIO and BROADCAST HISTORY library with thousands of books and magazines (worldradiohistory.com) , a fabulous resource for historical research into all things "audiophile". I ran across this subject in one of the two magazines around 1965 and I'm going to dive back to see if I can retrieve the link. All kidding aside, many behaviors encouraged by marketeers of the High End turn into demonstrably neurotic behavior, though I'm pretty sure this article was "just kidding". High Fidelity and Psychotherapy were hot topics for comics of the era.Ten Signs that you may be suffering from Audiophilus Nervosa, the neurotic behavior of the self-described "Audiophile":
#1: You have a box full of line level interconnects but can only use two pair at any given time.
#2: You have multiple LP copies of the same title, being wrapped up in the search for "The Perfect Copy".
#3: You have, at one time or another, used a green marker on your CDs or attached "rings" to said CDs, and can hear the difference.
#4: You have adjusted VTA on your tonearm so many times, you have worn out the screws.
#5: You are "into" swapping tubes.
#6: You have "Upgraded" your electronic gear with "High-End" passive parts.
#7: You have a re-clocking device between your digital source and your DAC, and the DAC set you back $10,000.00
#8: There are scratch marks all over your floor from constantly re-positioning your heavy floorstanding speakers.
#9: You KNOW LPs sound better.
#10: You get into a pointless argument on ASR and then get blocked.
Lol , I think there is an direct correlation. I will be at work ..in the middle of a task..stop and Google something about HIFi..its my escape.lolI've been reading old issues of High Fidelity and Stereo Review at worldradiohistory.com , a fabulous resource for historical research into all things "audiophile". I ran across this subject in one of the two magazines around 1965 and I'm going to dive back to see if I can retrieve the link. All kidding aside, many behaviors encouraged by marketeers of the High End turn into demonstrably neurotic behavior, though I'm pretty sure this article was "just kidding". High Fidelity and Psychotherapy were hot topics for comics of the era.