Being in drywall iv been coping with the lack of asbestos for a long time now.
While data might be shared there never will be a review .
The ' we ' is interesting as most of what I read is a reaction to ' interpretation ' . The data itself can be excluding, that's why the SINAD charts and the preference scores in the speaker reviews are so popular.Data (measurements) is all we care about.
Don't care about reviews.
I thought I couldAmirm can deal with this but I can't and nor can the membership in general,
I'm ok with my own perceptionsAs a forum we are too close to march audio , it's not just about objectivity it's about people's perceptions.
I'd not take it so personally, disagreement was not a crime last time I checked .I will phrase this as nicely as I can but he seems to butt into every thread and confronts people. Personally I find it bizarre that he's the owner of a company that gets lot of free attention here on this site and he gets a pass to go around criticizing everything. I've seen it on audiogon as well, there is this man named George who makes some kind of optical light based attentuator and because he makes what he perceives as the best preamp on earth, he thinks hes some kind of authority on everything. And he does the same thing, goes around on half the threads on the forum, throwing his weight around.
He's Australian too. Go figure.
would ask that we try and avoid circular arguments
There's no circular argument, and folks do moan about it .Agreed.
But the way Amir did it here is all that needs to be done. Post the measurements without review and bounce to the next product.
I don't think this approach was critisied in the thread?
So respectfully, your post yesterday contributes to the circular discussion. And it's not needed. There is precedence already with March Audio for a good approach...
What we really need to know Is whether March audio products sound good when listening to Polkas ?There's no circular argument, and folks do moan about it .
Your right there's a caveat in the ' non review ' .
I was not planning on discussing it further, just wanted to be ultra transparent. Possibly it was unnecessary .
Another idiot for ignore. Oh well.I will phrase this as nicely as I can but he seems to butt into every thread and confronts people. Personally I find it bizarre that he's the owner of a company that gets lot of free attention here on this site and he gets a pass to go around criticizing everything. I've seen it on audiogon as well, there is this man named George who makes some kind of optical light based attentuator and because he makes what he perceives as the best preamp on earth, he thinks hes some kind of authority on everything. And he does the same thing, goes around on half the threads on the forum, throwing his weight around.
He's Australian too. Go figure.
I will phrase this as nicely as I can but he seems to butt into every thread and confronts people. Personally I find it bizarre that he's the owner of a company that gets lot of free attention here on this site and he gets a pass to go around criticizing everything. I've seen it on audiogon as well, there is this man named George who makes some kind of optical light based attentuator and because he makes what he perceives as the best preamp on earth, he thinks hes some kind of authority on everything. And he does the same thing, goes around on half the threads on the forum, throwing his weight around.
He's Australian too. Go figure.
What problem do you have with George?George is a quack. Alan is not. I fail to see the parallel other than nationality.
What problem do you have with George?
Making ridiculous and unsupported claims about the stuff he's peddling, same as my problem with other audio quacks.
You have to admit, that Lightspeed has a pretty impressive frequency response...
View attachment 70594
Almost infinity. I love it.