ROOSKIE
Major Contributor
Yes, though it does depend on your view of 'imaging'You are right here, I just checked the ls50 and ls50 Meta. They both are more or less 50 degrees. In real life R Series was always narrow to my ears, and ls50 meta wide. Never listened to the Orginal ls50s. In a typical Hi-Fi Store, everything else sounds wider than uniq. Hardly heard any hifi speaker narrow as the r series recently. But they image better than everything. You cannot get both on a speaker if m not wrong.
KEF R3 and some others do the 'pinpoint' type of imaging very well.
I generally prefer the larger life sized imaging that some other types do well. I still consider that 'good imaging', but not 'pinpoint' rather imaging with large scale and envelopment.
If done well it makes things sound much more three dimensional to me vs the pinpoint type which can be interesting but often lacks approriate scale and sense of involvement. Probabily why I felt the R3 was a great speaker but not as satisfying in terms of true ambiance, and to this listener, realism.
The seach pecific recordings traits will of course be a big factor as well & I would think room size.
Some of the waveguided speakers seem to me to give a dose of both worlds. Getting a wider dispersion above 8k than some non-waveguided designs so that the highs have a bit more envelopment and yet still keeping more of the direct sounds of the mids in a very dominate role so that the stereo effects(imaging) there are still well portrayed with definition.