Hi @amirm and ASR forum, i’ve been following you for a few years now with great pleasure. But now I would like make you some questions I can’t answer. Sorry for my bad English
My source gear:
1)Self built mini-ITX computer (low power, theoretically lower noise cpu and high quality chokes) for local audio files reproduction trough SSD connected with SATA cable (so data only, ssd is external powered by linear PSU) with Wtfplay offline, no GUI linux based audio player;
2)Topping M50 DAP/Streamer used only for local audio files reproduction trough microSD card;
-Topping D90 DAC (USB input)
-Topping A90 Headphone AMP (XLR inputs, XLR output)
-Dan Clark Aeon 2 Noire headphones
Knowing that:
-A good DAC does not care about computer noise and jitter. What matter is the measured performance at his analog outputs: if there is no flaws or any flaws is below the threshold of audibility, it is OK;
-If we measure little differences (for example, short vs long USB cables thread here on ASR) most part of measured differences are not audible;
-Any difference in sound we can hear, which is not corroborated by objective measurements and blind tests, is based on our expectations
Considering that:
-I trust audio science and this is the way i Bought all my gear;
-I don't feel comfortable with A-B quick tests. I can hear real differences only when I’m used to listen to the same gear for months and then I change something (even without being aware of it) in my hifi chain;
-I can’t do blind test between Computer and Topping M50 player because each time i detach USB cable from my audio computer, Wtfplay player needs to be reconfigured with the DAC
The fact:
-The first time i compared local file reproduction trough Wifi NAS streaming vs direct USB HDD connection on a Raspberry Pi years ago, I expected that Wifi streamed files should be sound worse. But it was the opposite: Wifi streaming seemed less noisy to me. By “less noisy” I mean the difference you can see on contrast and blacks between an OLED and an LCD screen on dark scenes. Maybe it is what some folks call “blacker background”?
-Now the same thing is happening with the Topping M50 player: didn't buy it expecting to improve the performance compared to my yet good existing audio computer, but only to save space and gain comfort (too many cables and PSUs, while the Topping M50 is so tiny and simple to use). But when i connected it the first time to my D90 DAC through USB input, the first thing i noticed - without any effort - was this increased contrast so that I was able to more easily distinguish background details in my favorite albums. Just like when after buying your first OLED TV you watch again your favorite movies
My questions:
1)How can this be explained? Is all about my imagination? Or maybe also a well designed DAC could be influenced by source (computer) noise in some way / to some extent?
2)So, if non-objectively existing differences in audio we hear in non-blind tests depend on our expectations, what about differences you can ear when you have no expectations about a result?
Thanks Amirm and all of you
My source gear:
1)Self built mini-ITX computer (low power, theoretically lower noise cpu and high quality chokes) for local audio files reproduction trough SSD connected with SATA cable (so data only, ssd is external powered by linear PSU) with Wtfplay offline, no GUI linux based audio player;
2)Topping M50 DAP/Streamer used only for local audio files reproduction trough microSD card;
-Topping D90 DAC (USB input)
-Topping A90 Headphone AMP (XLR inputs, XLR output)
-Dan Clark Aeon 2 Noire headphones
Knowing that:
-A good DAC does not care about computer noise and jitter. What matter is the measured performance at his analog outputs: if there is no flaws or any flaws is below the threshold of audibility, it is OK;
-If we measure little differences (for example, short vs long USB cables thread here on ASR) most part of measured differences are not audible;
-Any difference in sound we can hear, which is not corroborated by objective measurements and blind tests, is based on our expectations
Considering that:
-I trust audio science and this is the way i Bought all my gear;
-I don't feel comfortable with A-B quick tests. I can hear real differences only when I’m used to listen to the same gear for months and then I change something (even without being aware of it) in my hifi chain;
-I can’t do blind test between Computer and Topping M50 player because each time i detach USB cable from my audio computer, Wtfplay player needs to be reconfigured with the DAC
The fact:
-The first time i compared local file reproduction trough Wifi NAS streaming vs direct USB HDD connection on a Raspberry Pi years ago, I expected that Wifi streamed files should be sound worse. But it was the opposite: Wifi streaming seemed less noisy to me. By “less noisy” I mean the difference you can see on contrast and blacks between an OLED and an LCD screen on dark scenes. Maybe it is what some folks call “blacker background”?
-Now the same thing is happening with the Topping M50 player: didn't buy it expecting to improve the performance compared to my yet good existing audio computer, but only to save space and gain comfort (too many cables and PSUs, while the Topping M50 is so tiny and simple to use). But when i connected it the first time to my D90 DAC through USB input, the first thing i noticed - without any effort - was this increased contrast so that I was able to more easily distinguish background details in my favorite albums. Just like when after buying your first OLED TV you watch again your favorite movies
My questions:
1)How can this be explained? Is all about my imagination? Or maybe also a well designed DAC could be influenced by source (computer) noise in some way / to some extent?
2)So, if non-objectively existing differences in audio we hear in non-blind tests depend on our expectations, what about differences you can ear when you have no expectations about a result?
Thanks Amirm and all of you
Last edited: