Understand what he wrote in the fist place ?So, I don't have the basic right to disagree with you AND I don't have the right to find some common ground !!!! What am I to do ???
Understand what he wrote in the fist place ?So, I don't have the basic right to disagree with you AND I don't have the right to find some common ground !!!! What am I to do ???
Is neither an optionIm little more for int. tube amp (Muzishare x7), but considere to buy second hand tube preamp (Schiit freya) + some power amp (in a class). What do you think?
It is not about sounding nicely, but about being sonically accurate. Modern solid state amplifiers are almost invariably sonically transparent/accurate, and very few tube amplifiers are.sound nicely
No he actually means that badly designed amps are bad , its that simpleIf I understand you, all tube amps are bad because some are badly designed.
Well, if one wants a tube amp, the usual reason in this century is not because it is more accurate. Rather because it is NOT. With the idea it has a unique and pleasing sound. That part is debatable, but telling someone get an accurate amp instead isn't a good argument if they want to live with "tube" sound.It is not about sounding nicely, but about being sonically accurate. Modern solid state amplifiers are almost invariably sonically transparent/accurate, and very few tube amplifiers are.
Sure, but we should retain the distinction between fact and opinion.Well, if one wants a tube amp, the usual reason in this century is not because it is more accurate. Rather because it is NOT. With the idea it has a unique and pleasing sound. That part is debatable, but telling someone get an accurate amp instead isn't a good argument if they want to live with "tube" sound.
There are some clearly objective reasons tube amps sound different. The most obvious being FR alterations from the output impedance and transformers. There are a few other ideas about them. Some of which are false. Some of which are possible, but it has not been determined.Perhaps this is just not the ideal place to ask for opinion on which type of tube amp to buy because objectively most folks think SS are superior for objective reasons. If it's a choice based on other desires or reasons that's totally cool, but it's a subjective decision and therefore only you can decide...
I like that.Well, if one wants a tube amp, the usual reason in this century is not because it is more accurate. Rather because it is NOT. With the idea it has a unique and pleasing sound. That part is debatable, but telling someone get an accurate amp instead isn't a good argument if they want to live with "tube" sound.
SIY is one to ask for such things for sure.I like that.
But we can try to explain why that is, it's not magic .
Output transformers low feedback other design considerations I'm not tech savy enough to describe ( we ask SIY for those ) .
Sellers of some tube stuff like AN tries Voo voo arguments like silver wires and special paper in oil capacitors and that Negative feedback is bad and other snake oil arguments .
Just bring it back to earth and explain that its quite measurable normal electrical properties .
And you who know tube amps may point to well made modern tube amps, or some classic that may be refurbished to working condition .
IF had the spare time and room for it I would consider DIY tube amps + some classic big effective totally wrong horn speakers for the fun of it
Sadly i have be more rational and use my limited space for one good setup ( even i wished i had more rooms )
Im little more for int. tube amp (Muzishare x7), but considere to buy second hand tube preamp (Schiit freya) + some power amp (in a class). What do you think?
Hello, i have Swiss speaker Rowen M8: (but older model think that they have 92db eff...)I can offer a suggestion, but really need to know what speakers you will be using.
|
Hello, i have Swiss speaker Rowen M8: (but older model think that they have 92db eff...)
mode of operation: passive conception: acoustic-suspension frequencies: 33 - 36000 Hz ways/systems: 2 / 2 efficiency: 90 dB impedance: 6 Ω tweeter/mid: 1.9cm woofer: 20cm crossover frequencies: 4.5kHz capacitance: 300 W
That is a very surprising statement. It is possible to design a very good tube amp and preamp, but recent commercial examples are pretty hard to find; almost all vastly underperform well-engineered tube amps of the past (e.g. Williamson, Mullard, Mac, RCA, deParavicini-era Luxman and EAR) as well as engineered DIY designs from people like Pete Millett, Morgan Jones, and (cough, cough) one of our members here.And I would also remind you that recent tube amps are indeed objectively well designed and well made !
Thanks...its over my budget, now have rotel rb991, thinking to go in direction for good preamp...now i had Vincent sa32, jus looking for vincent sa t7...Probably going to need some power to make them "come alive". Tube amp choice being the question, I suggest getting an amp with a higher damping factor. The unity coupled output design would be a decent choice.
McIntosh MC275
orMcIntosh MC275 Vacuum Tube Amplifier
The MC275 Vacuum Tube Amplifier has all the features to meet the needs of today’s music enthusiast while preserving the qualities that have made it the most revered McIntosh tube amplifier of all time.www.mcintoshlabs.com
Quicksilver Audio KT Mono Amplifier
KT Mono Amplifier – Quicksilver Audio
quicksilveraudio.com
If you listen loud in a big room, you may need to go with solid state.
Putting aside SETs, which are just glorified table radio amps, the main things affecting sonics are source impedance and overload characteristics (important because of the lower powers normally seen).SIY likely knows of some other parameters.