LoL... Some of those enthusiasts are mellower and calmer than the average peeps here.I feel like I shouldn't read too much into the posts of the weed-smoking enthusiasts!
LoL... Some of those enthusiasts are mellower and calmer than the average peeps here.I feel like I shouldn't read too much into the posts of the weed-smoking enthusiasts!
Nice setup.Not quite so.
Every day, I listen to equipment that has a pristinely clean spec sheet. Headphones that support 5Hz to 40kHz (Beyerdynamic 1990 Pro) fed through a JDS Labs Atom 3, which supports 20Hz to 20kHz with a +/-0.11dB linearity and less than 0.0004% THD. I do not care which amp and speakers people in here have, their measurements will most likely never ever remotely approach that even with the most magical room correction.
So I have a *daily* reference as to what a truly linear response with *full* bass extension is, equipment wise, thank you very much. One that I can also compare to my main listening system. Anyone that claims I don't appreciate a heapful of extra bass because I don't have a reference must thus have been dropped off a second floor balcony as a baby. :-D
Do you have a list?I feel like I shouldn't read too much into the posts of the weed-smoking enthusiasts!
Yep, gotta hear those panels buzzing and rattling 3 blocks away or your not really doin it. LOLI don’t know, in the world of car audio a bass system wildly overblown which resonates at one frequency like somebody kicking a box in the back of the car seems to be de-rigeur, and cars without it are heavily critiscised…
Not quite so.
Every day, I listen to equipment that has a pristinely clean spec sheet. Headphones that support 5Hz to 40kHz (Beyerdynamic 1990 Pro)...
Nice setup.
I have some good phones and clean electronics too.
My issue with headphones is stage, not linearity and certainly not lack of bass (because we can establish via measurements it is all there).Personally, I think phones are only capable of delivering maybe half the experience of bass.
Bass is not just in the ears for me; it's an integration of what the ears hear, and the body feels.
That's when music comes alive for me...and for me it takes speakers (with balls )
I could agree with you 50%.I am *not* saying those that insist one must have delivery down to 16Hz to have a true audiophile system have a juvenile preference for artificially boosted, booming bass, either. My point was and remains that for my own purposes, I don't think cutting off stuff at 25-30Hz hurts music that much at all, at least not the music I tend to listen to. The discussion actually seems to just come up with a few corner cases of recordings where the stuff is present, and beyond that, whether it is necessary for personal enjoyment, hey, that's up to individual preference.
I don't dispute that the least. As stated, bass *does* matter to me, no doubt about it - and I have clearly optimized my environment to deliver on a level of performance I am entirely happy with, and which Dirac approves off, too. At 20Hz, my 2:1 system supposedly does 20Hz at -3dB-ish. My headphone setup on the other hand is +/- 0.1dBish, It honestly makes little difference to me. I also admit I seldom listen to anything over 88ish or so SPL. I also know I have very sensitive ears, even when I was a teenager and we went to concerts, my friends would revel in the sound while I would get a splitting headache and often used those waxy earplugs we had in the 80s, if anyone else recalls them. I was also the earliest earplug adopter among all of my motorcycle riding friends at a very young age (I know you are a fellow rider, too :-D).I could agree with you 50%.
The thing is, a system capable of decent 16-20hz delivery earns big dividends in the freq above that in low distortion, etc.
If you would then filter out everything below say 30hz you would not notice any change in the vast majority of sources.
But replace that system with one that falls apart trying to play anything below 50hz at 90db, IE a small stand mount 2 way,
and there is a world of difference with a large portion of all genre.
I think the problem was you weren't getting high enough.I also know I have very sensitive ears, even when I was a teenager and we went to concerts, my friends would revel in the sound while I would get a splitting headache and often used those waxy earplugs we had in the 80s, if anyone else recalls them.
Can you please post a picture of your system/room? Just to get an more immediate impression of what you use?
Presumably the Denon's reponse to all this, every time you start playing some vinyl is "oh bloody hell, here we go again".I have 8 Ino audio profundus Y passive 12" ported subwoofers (6 in the front, 2 in the back), 16Hz -1dB.
Jesus Christ man, your insane.I have 8 Ino audio profundus Y passive 12" ported subwoofers (6 in the front, 2 in the back), 16Hz -1dB.
Better to be this type of insane than some others in audiophilia I can think ofJesus Christ man, your insane.
Presumably the Denon's reponse to all this, every time you start playing some vinyl is "oh bloody hell, here we go again".
....
Double entendre, surely?I mostly play music quite low.
I have 8 Ino audio profundus Y passive 12" ported subwoofers (6 in the front, 2 in the back), 16Hz -1dB.
The analog crossover filter for the subwoofers is Ino audio, CR80s (30dB/octave, 78Hz).
The top-speaker for above 80Hz is Ino audio i64s and one i32s as center.
The front top-speakers is driven by two Sybarite audio No1200 monoblocks (2x1400 watt @ 8 ohm)
The subwoofers are driven by a 4-channel VTV PASCAL L-PRO2S (4x400 watt @ 8 ohm)
A Denon AVR-X3600H receiver for HT and as pre-amp.
Oppo and Panasonic BD and UHD players.
Denon DP59-L turntable with a Audio technica AT-OC9/III cartridge and Holographic audio RIAA Two phonostage.
Room treatment by Ingvar Ohman professional acoustician and the guy behind Ino audio. I'm VERY pleased with the room, the sound is amazing and the bass is awesome (the RT60 between 30-200Hz is between 0,4-0,25s).