Could be, but the cost and effort of developing something like that is enormous, and at least the performance is there and the price is right. Having too many features is to me a lesser evil than selling a DAC 10K$ with poor measurements, and those are out there. I could be tempted to give the benefit of the doubt, It is indeed over engineered, but the marketing value of willing to do stuff your own way in the end is slim compared to the cost of doing so. Sometimes I think the people that goes to these lengths are motivated by the challenge and genuinely believe that on some metrics what they try to solve is worth it, I get that, putting a reference design in a box gets boring over time when it's your 20th DAC you design, It's not worth it for the customer, but I don't think one would go that route just for marketing value.This is an example of a product that takes audiophile marketing to the extreme. Some audiophiles believe they need features used in professional environments such as external clocking, so Gustard brings these features into a DAC that will never be used by any professional, and then names the DAC “Pro” knowing full well this is not a professional product, but also knowing the name and features perceived as professional will appeal to non-professional audiophiles. It makes the head spIn.
Of course, this is just another day at the office in the audio(phile) industry.
Last edited: