Exactly. He starts the review with pejorative constatation that fosi v3 mono sounds like an amp and thus the review is pointles but he will with heavy heart do it anyway. Isn't that the most possible positive conclusion about amp reviewing and the whole reason they exist - checking if they in fact sound like an amp and not something else? Also the manufacturer somehow hurt him sending him amps for testing - so i understand he's agains that and is only about testing products he bought or was sent by customers? It doesnt look like it as he normaly reviews equpment he gets from manufacturers. Also he is negatively suprised that after he posted not so positive review about previous fosi amp they send him another? Like it's a bad thing to send products to rewiewers that don't only say positive things? Then he's offended that they let him keep the amps, almost implying they try to bribe him. Jesus. Then he goes he sadly couldn't hear difference with other Fosi amp so on this he concludes the whole making of v3 monos was pointless xD. Like why ever do another amp review then? Maby if ther's no hearable distortion other things would play some role, like the W/$ ratio - he doesn't care. But then he almost prises another amp that he could in fact hear it sound "different" - so making that amp was more justified? xD And then big boy amps he likes, 500W, thats the way to go, so from now on no amp will ever get his positive rewiew if it's under 500W? Seroiusly i'm not a snowflake but this review is just offensiveI think the key is in his reference to 'big boy amplifiers' he uses in the very last section - his 500 watt into 4 ohm's he uses in his main rig. A more telling comparison would have been a/b'ing with those. This is where it gets weird - like - do those not sound 'just like amplifiers' too when he talks about the sound.
He's like, i'm an american driving a monster truck, so sheer existence of this toyotas offend me. Oh, you can plow a field with this toyota? My monstar truck could two, see, there is no reason for them to exist or review them.
I was cheering for this guy when he got court threats from manufacturer, but seeing this super manipulative review i'd also understend the need for manufacturers to defend against such practices.
Last edited: