I was replying to the original post, which was in Polish.It would be nice if you could write in English
I was replying to the original post, which was in Polish.It would be nice if you could write in English
Hi, here is my above reply in English: “Hello, in any case Hypex or Purifi will have higher performance, both in terms of power and dynamic range. I am writing this having both systems in my home : Purifi>Focal 926 (91.5db given by the manufacturer, but 88db measured on audio.com.pl) and 2x Fosi V3 mono/48V-10A>ELAC DBR62. The question is whether the difference is worth the extra dollars to you. On my side, I chose to have both: Purifi/Focal as my main system and Fosi/DBR62 for background music in the dining room.”Found a set of about 20 posts that were adjacent to target deletions that should have not been deleted. They have been restored.
If you find any other issues, please use Report feature and will review. Avoid posting forum issues in thread as it just creates more clutter.
Thanks!
![]()
Fosi Audio V3 Mono Monoblock Amplifier Stand by lanwanman | Download free STL model | Printables.com
Performance stand for Fosi V3 Mono amps. Elevates chassis for 360° airflow to reduce heat. Support-free 0.2mm print. | Download free 3D printable STL modelswww.printables.com
Just pleasantly warm to the touchNo matter how you slice it, these amps are space heaters. 39°c, 104°f. Warm to the touch.
That’s definitely an interesting ideaJust pleasantly warm to the touch
And remember if you add a fan driven cooler you are making the heating worse rather than better as you are still dissipating the same heat from the amps plus in addition the heat generated by the fan itself.
I think it may depend on the physical setup and the use case.No matter how you slice it, these amps are space heaters. 39°c, 104°f. Warm to the touch.
A used MA6700 is sold for $5,000 CAD+, and a brand new Fosi for $165 CAD x 2 (if stereo) = $330 CAD.I heard these amps against m'y McIntosh
There are not bad, they do the job but frankly, not even come close to a Mc
They are very competitive against my restored MC225, 30's, 240 and 2105. I love those amps, but if for some reason I had to sell them tomorrow and live with the various Fosi amps I would have no issue.I heard these amps against m'y McIntosh
There are not bad, they do the job but frankly, not even come close to a Mc
What you miss is a very high price to feed your elitist egoOk
Dont take me wrong
The fois do deliver good sound, but a little thing is missing in my opinion.. hard to describe
A used MA6700 is sold for $5,000 CAD+, and a brand new Fosi for $165 CAD x 2 (if stereo) = $330 CAD.
Not to mention 200 watts vs 120 watts into 8 Ohm and class AB vs Class D.
Given the above, not sure the comparison is extremely informative.
If they had given me a euro for every time an audiophile made this statement, I would now have the Muon kefs in the basement instead of the R3sNope didn't, i never do blind testing
For it was obvious mc was at another level
Obviously, some equipment may be superior to others, butSo you agréé that some gear cannbe superior ti other gear?
Excellent points, I was about to say "No, a class AB will sound different from class D", then I saw "blind listening"... and I didn't say anything, as I am simply not sure at all I would be able to tell one from the otherNot all amplifiers sound the same ... usually by 2 reasons:
- have bad engineering (too high THD / noise, non linear response, etc)
- is out of their capabilities (power, temperature, speaker impedance, etc)
when that stuff is ok, yes, they all sound indistinguishable for the human ear, it doesn't matter the price tag or the quality of the case
But, you need to compare with levelled gain and without knowing what amplifier is playing ... in other way your brain will activate the "placebo effect" to make you happy.
You can find thousands of experiences in the internet with blind listening... and always the results are shocking.