Drone/doom
Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Messages
- 32
- Likes
- 14
From reading a crap ton of impressions, Is it safe to say that a good planar headphone/speaker >>>> Dynamic driver?.
And this also applies to electrostats, that definitely have disadvantages of their own compared to both dynamic and planar drivers.Now that I have Stax electrostats at home I find this question irrelevant...
As everyone said before, the technology can be only as good as the engineering. You can create terrible\terrific drivers in any technology.
And this also applies to electrostats, that definitely have disadvantages of their own compared to both dynamic and planar drivers.
As everyone said before, the technology can be only as good as the engineering. You can create terrible\terrific drivers in any technology.
And this also applies to electrostats, that definitely have disadvantages of their own compared to both dynamic and planar drivers.
so do but the HifiMan He6 is almost the equal of the 007 from (ballpark) 4 KHz and its superior in the bass department by far .. The HE6 redefines what bass can be on Headphones IMO... Properly driven. currently using a Yamaha CA2010 in Class A straight into it ... the trick is to use Yamaha Mute Switch... It has a -20 dB settingNow that I have Stax electrostats at home I find this question irrelevant...
Pistonic instead of psionic? Although Marketing would lead you to believe psionic magic is involved...
Well if you want to get technical (pun intended), then electrostats don't have a magnet in themI think the technology is the same in both (since the 70's in the last century, magnet moving a membrane, pumping air into your ears), only the technique is different.
I was talking about dynamics and planars.Well if you want to get technical (pun intended), then electrostats don't have a magnet in them