Pareto Pragmatic
Active Member
I am not sure how it works for these folks, but often there is a distinction made for being in the presence of technology vs. actually using it. Like, for example, I doubt they are required to leave the room if someone turns on electric lights. So it's probably the same for a WiiM playing music or whatever. But they wouldn't be inclined to mess with it themselves, presumably.
Being around versus using is a good way to think about it. They do go outside their community after all.
Generally speaking, because different versions of their doctrines exist, they reject technology that would interfere with their chosen path, they adapt technology that does not interfere with their chosen path. And those choices are often on a case by case basis.
For example, many communities will have a single phone. They would never have them in the house (interferes with family life, invites the outside into the home). But a single phone allows those who they do business with to contact them without physically coming to the community. That physical entry is seen as more disruptive than a phone call, so the single phone is a good use of technology to preserve their way of life.
The Amish split from the Mennonites because they saw Mennonites as being too worldly. "Worldly" is the problem, not technology per se, though it has been a very long time since I did any research into the groups. So take that with a large grain of salt.