• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Audyssey's Next Generation of Room Correction (MultEQ-X)

Are you a current Denon/Marantz AVR Owner and if so what do you think of Audyssey's MultEQ-X?

  • I'm a current AVR owner. $200 price is acceptable. I've already purchased it.

  • I'm a current AVR owner. $200 price is acceptable. I’m willing to spend the money once I learn more.

  • I'm a current AVR owner. $200 price is too high. Anything lower is better.

  • I'm not a current Denon/Marantz AVR owner. $200 price is acceptable.

  • I'm not a current Denon/Marantz AVR owner. $200 price is too high. Anything lower lower is better.

  • I'm a current AVR owner. $200 price is acceptable, but I don't like the restrictive terms. Wont buy.

  • I'm not an owner. $200 price is acceptable, but I don't like the restrictive terms. Wont buy.

  • Other (please explain).


Results are only viewable after voting.
Maybe I’m missing something but what I see is they are charging money to bring extra functionality to an AVR. When you sell that AVR the functionality goes with that AVR.
No it doesn't - it won't work for the new user.

Well, unless they're happy with the calibration for your old room, and aren't intending to run their own. :)

(At least this is what I'm assuming when they say per-user. With Audyssey Pro, you have to regenerate keys online from your installer account for one of your licensed AVRs. With that system I suppose the new owner could get in touch with the old owner to ask them to ask Audyssey for a new key whenever necessary. They last a month. This might be tricker though.)
 
Something I learnt from the webinar is about the hated MRC. I remember people used to complain about it and thought it spoiled the "sound" completely, yet Audyssey does it to not EQ the dip out. So if the speaker was not designed to have that "BBC dip" then there won't be a dip. If it was designed to have one that Audyssey would leave it there but you have the MRC disabled. Talked about expectation bias/Placebo, that was another solid proof.:p
 
Too bad on using a calibrated mic like UMIK-1... looks like I'd have to run the calibration with the default mic, add whatever PEQ filters, remeasure with UMIK-1/REW, and manually adjust the filters until the speaker response matches the desired target in REW.
 
Duplicate threads merged here. Some posts may be out of order. Apologies for that. Happens when we consolidate threads.

Carry on!
 
Last edited:
OK, no Umik support, and after you pay 200$ for your current AVR, you'll have to pay 200$ more when you decide to upgrade the AVR to a newer model... I'll save the 200$ and wait for Onkyo RZ-70 coming in 2022, then buy DLBC license...
 
Maybe I’m missing something but what I see is they are charging money to bring extra functionality to an AVR. When you sell that AVR the functionality goes with that AVR.

When you buy an option for your car isn’t it the same? Why should I expect the superior sound system option I paid for my BMW to be applied to my new BMW?

Audyssey is not a measurement tool that is used by a technician or a hobbyist. It’s is an option for an AVR.
I would expect BMW to not come and rip out the sound system option when I sell the car. The buyer would also be quite upset at such an act.

It's a software license. They could easily allow transfers but choose not to, and the only rational reason is "we think these suckers will bend over and take it."
 
I would expect BMW to not come and rip out the sound system option when I sell the car. The buyer would also be quite upset at such an act.

It's a software license. They could easily allow transfers but choose not to, and the only rational reason is "we think these suckers will bend over and take it."
They are not ripping anything though do they? They are just selling you a non-transferable license. It’s not nice but it’s almost the norm in the software industry. Here’s a case for one the most use software in the world, MS Office.

Denon just learning how to earn money from software. There’s no malice here. There’s though ignorance on the forum.
 
I watched part of the webinar, and I did like that the file output format is JSON, so it should be able to add in a house curve. I have bought the app twice (Android and then again when I switched to IPhone).

I would pay for not having to use my fat fingers to adjust the curves in the app, but that’s worth $50, maybe $100 if it could be used on all my AVRs. I think there are enough features over the app, just that they priced this incorrectly. I’d still consider a Dirac AVR for my next purchase, if this was priced lower, I might never consider a non-Audyssey AVR.
 
Something I learnt from the webinar is about the hated MRC. I remember people used to complain about it and thought it spoiled the "sound" completely, yet Audyssey does it to not EQ the dip out. So if the speaker was not designed to have that "BBC dip" then there won't be a dip. If it was designed to have one that Audyssey would leave it there but you have the MRC disabled. Talked about expectation bias/Placebo, that was another solid proof.:p

That is either a misunderstanding, misinformation, or a pandemic-era correction of previous bad behavior. Audyssey did impose their midrange voicing choice (some might say error) on everyone using their "reference" curve.

See, e.g, the measurements in my Marantz AV7702 AVP and Denon X4100 AVR reviews for examples of Audyssey imposing this dip despite use of good speakers. I wish more people measured what RC systems do in reviews. That's the single most sonically-relevant thing about the damn boxes.

I never tested it with the App because the first thing I did upon opening the app was get rid of that dumb dip!

As for this new version, I lost all interest when I saw it wasn't for Macs. I read that as part of the original billing, so that is a huge disappointment.
 
Last edited:
Given the timing I thought for sure this was going to be a direct response to Onkyo/Pioneer getting Dirac, but wow they've taken stupid to a whole new level, $200 for EACH AVR is completely divorced from reality. Imagine telling your best customers who are running and frequently updating Denon/Marantz AVR's in multiple rooms (having already paid the built-in Audyssey's licensing cost several times over) that they have to shell out $200 per unit for a user interface that only partially fixes the deficiencies people have been complaining about for more than a decade. They're actively disincentivizing people from upgrading and/or buying multiple Denon/Marantz AVR's here, absolute braindead business sense. This is a niche market carried heavily (if not majority) by word of mouth marketing. I can't think of any scenario where someone should buy or recommend a Denon/Marantz product when Onkyo/Pioneer have even better functionality built-in to units that cost several hundred dollars less.
 
Last edited:
They are not ripping anything though do they? They are just selling you a non-transferable license. It’s not nice but it’s almost the norm in the software industry. Here’s a case for one the most use software in the world, MS Office.

Denon just learning how to earn money from software. There’s no malice here. There’s though ignorance on the forum.
And yet that same person in your example would be able to use it on multiple computers of their own, or to move it to a new computer.

Also, if you bought Office licensed to a computer the license follows that computer, for example to a new owner.

The emerging norm these days is to tie rights to a user service account, and the rights are generally portable to new hardware the user purchases.

If I could purchase a license tied to a Sound United account and use that license on another AVR I purchase in the future, I would have no complaints. As it is, they are effectively giving everyone 200 reasons to buy a Dirac-enabled Onkyo instead for their next upgrade.
 
If I could purchase a license tied to a Sound United account and use that license on another AVR I purchase in the future, I would have no complaints. As it is, they are effectively giving everyone 200 reasons to buy a Dirac-enabled Onkyo instead for their next upgrade.
Maybe they realise that and change their ways? This is why ASR exists.

What I wanted to show to the posters who think Denon are money grabbers or stupid that they are not. They are a hardware company dipping their toes into the software market. Apple, Tesla, they all do the same, but as you said they do it in away that they do not alienate people.

Like it or not, this is the future.
 
Maybe they realise that and change their ways? This is why ASR exists.

What I wanted to show to the posters who think Denon are money grabbers or stupid that they are not. They are a hardware company dipping their toes into the software market. Apple, Tesla, they all do the same, but as you said they do it in away that they do not alienate people.

Like it or not, this is the future.
We’ll see more details later what this new app does and future plans, and I hope the offering gets better than it appears today.

To me it looks like an app that runs on Windows and costs 10 times more with smaller improvements over the mobile app. Not being able to use my own measurement mic is a big negative.

So not a release that I hoped for.
 
Ok. I just bought the license for my Marantz. I just had to see for myself. Got to go do some reading up on it but have a few questions regarding when I connect and shows a list of channels connected to myself AVR, seems a few of mine are greyed out and can't be checked but in the Sample AVR they show up.
 

Attachments

  • 20211215_191240.jpg
    20211215_191240.jpg
    116.4 KB · Views: 285
  • 20211215_191323.jpg
    20211215_191323.jpg
    130.4 KB · Views: 286
Also I have to be on the internet then open the app for it to function.
 
Maybe they realise that and change their ways? This is why ASR exists.

What I wanted to show to the posters who think Denon are money grabbers or stupid that they are not. They are a hardware company dipping their toes into the software market. Apple, Tesla, they all do the same, but as you said they do it in away that they do not alienate people.

Like it or not, this is the future.

They do not do the same. You keep presenting false equivalences.

For your examples to hold, Apple would need to force you to re-purchase all your apps every time you buy a new iPhone.

Microsoft does not force you to re-purchase your digital games every time you buy a new Xbox. They are tied to your user account, and you can install them on your new Xbox.

The approach they're taking is the worst of all possible combinations, and as you have seen in this thread, it absolutely does tarnish the brand.

The future is one-time or subscription based purchases tied to a user account, transferable to your future hardware, often with concurrent entitlements.
 
I can't think of any scenario where someone should buy or recommend a Denon/Marantz product when Onkyo/Pioneer have even better functionality built-in to units that cost several hundred dollars less.
Here is one scenario for not relying on Pioneer AVRs...
 
Back
Top Bottom