I should have had it like week ago, covid delays everything. I am very curious about it.And sounds.
I don't know. Maybe I am wrongly prejudiced against SMPS. Still have in memory NAD m51 DAC sound, very poor DAC, grey, fuzzy. But also one DAC that costs ab. $11.000 with SMPS that sounded similar (and was beaten by old MBL CD player so badly).Which LPSU would you recommend to get less than 0.2uV of ripple ?
Maybe I am wrongly prejudiced against SMPS.
I thought about benchmark LA4, much more expensive than Pre90.
Maybe not all SMPS are equal ?
Look at the chart showing noise from AHB2 (green) and Hypex NC400 (red).
Every class D amp by now is doing this.
I have a Conrad Johnson Premier Two somewhere, but I don't even think of connecting it to compare. Sure, it could sound more beautiful or pleasant, but that's not my point which is "true to record making".Thank you for your reply. I agree totally.
Speaking of high end: I have ordered a X16 two weeks ago, just to see if there is a notable improvement to my Apogee PSX 100 and I am curious, if new designs for the pre will improve the experience in comparison to my Convergent SL-1Tubepre. Btw, the X16 has 300 Ohm out, the p90 2kOhm in, the smls400, as I learned over 1kOhm out. I think, I am going with the Gustard p26 with solid 47k in...
Btw, the single ended in is occupied with a TEAC 2000 reel to reel..
1. He doesn't measure how much noise is going back into AC line that transfers to other equipment...SMPS though ! - never say never
https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/ap...audio-myth-switching-power-supplies-are-noisy
Good to hear. I hope your dislike of SMPS might have gone just a little..Wow! The Pre90 sounds great! It is smooth in midrange, mids have breath, depth and width, instruments have more obviuos placement and air around, vocals are so natural, human like. High frequencies are incredibly good, zero harsh, zero grain, black background, there is speed when needed but also the calmness as well, very refined sound indeed (for ex. wood sounds as wood). The music is full bodied without muddiness. Pace and rhythm are great as well which is not so common. I cannot point anything weak in the sound of this small gem yet. This preamp definately stays with me.
There are no obviuos truths in this hobby. This is the best SMPS device I've heard. There is no greyness or fuzziness in the sound.Good to hear. I hope your dislike of SMPS might have gone just a little..
Gratulation. I have altered my decision too and instead of the Gustard Pre, I gonna order the Topping Pre. I am very curious how it will perform in my settings...Wow! The Pre90 sounds great! It is smooth in midrange, mids have breath, depth and width, instruments have more obviuos placement and air around, vocals are so natural, human like. High frequencies are incredibly good, zero harsh, zero grain, black background, there is speed when needed but also the calmness as well, very refined sound indeed (for ex. wood sounds as wood). The music is full bodied without muddiness. Pace and rhythm are great as well which is not so common. I cannot point anything weak in the sound of this small gem yet. This preamp definately stays with me.[/QUOT
There are no obviuos truths in this hobby. This is the best SMPS device I've heard. There is no greyness or fuzziness in the sound.