Its hard to count how many readers in this thread that look down on low end reach performance for F328Be plus Amir must be deaf and dont know how real bass should sound (some readers tell we need at least 4 times subs and reaching 16 times subs we begin probably to have good bass performance) and also some tell Amir's anechoic analyzer from Klippel company cant measure floorstanders right in low end of scale.
Have really no clue how 16 times distributed subs sound systemwise but have visited many systems that sound so overblown none bass natural that its to cry over especially because owners havent noticed, what i should know is Revel is not stupid and Klippel NFS can resolute acoustics so its to dream about, so will mean when a third party as Amir with his pro analyzer sweep F328Be low end curve to what it is then thats what Revel research prefer as target curve for a premium speaker situated inside a normal home that have floor walls and cieling, cant imagine Amir's Klippel scanner isnt right for floorstanders into low end domain and in that regard think about
@hardisj measured F226Be to also perform less low end reach than manufacture brochure suggets so think readers should calm down and be jealous and happy Amir own that wonder robot machine, well Amir did say in post 1 that it could be the funny strait slope from port tuning area and up should be more rounded as for F208 but its close enough to F208 that myself will conclude its a target in that area Revel shoot for, about if Amir is bass deaf is funny because often seen he also is told to be a bass head but please look at below animation than omits a few boundarys but include floor/frontwall/sidewall/cieling and please notice floor boundary is enogh to get Amir's anechoic analyze pretty close to manufacture curve, and in <100Hz area is overblown hot compared to JBL/Toole trained listener curve should be proof Amir is not bass deaf when he report there is plenty of clean bass in his listening test
..
View attachment 93244
View attachment 93243