KEFCarver
Active Member
This is a review of the NJ&FXAUDIO PW-6 “HiFi Audio Power Switcher”. I had been looking for an A/B speaker/amplifier switcher and really liked the Douk VU3 “Little Bear”, which I purchased. I was happy with until I tested it and discovered that it had a +1dB boost in the frequency response at 20hz, and while it was the same with any input, and in theory you would probably not hear a difference, it bothered me and I returned it. I posted my write-up here: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?attachments/douk-audio-switcher-pdf.220808/.
I later found out that Amir had already done a review of the Douk VU3: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/douk-vu3-review-vu-meters.26827/.
I did not have the budget to spend $1400 on the Van Alstine a/b/x comparator, and eventually came across the PW-6:
I purchased it on Ebay for about $70 (at the time): https://www.ebay.com/itm/263331053496 .It appears to be part of the Douk Audio family. It comes with a small remote and a 12vdc wall wart. The PW-6 weighs a bit more than a pound and is constructed with what I am guessing is aluminum for the housing- it has a nice solid feel to it. It is approximately 7”x5”x1.5”. The connectors are standard banana jack/wire/spade lugs, with 0.75” spacings. There is not a lot of room between them so using really large spade lugs may be a problem; however, all my testing was done using banana jacks and I had no problems. I used the banana to rca adapters I had built for my testing of the Douk VU3:
I used a QuantAsylum QA402 Audio Analyzer for my measurements, and used a 2vrms (6dBV) signal level for my testing. The RCA test cables are 4’ long, and the frequency span for all measurements was 20hz-20khz. The first measurement was to check the frequency response. The Right channel (in red) has the QA402 input and output cables connected together with an rca barrel adapter, so it is bypassing the PW-6. There is very little difference between the two, though you can see just a small amount of 60hz on the Left channel (yellow) which is going from A Left to B Left:
For the next plot, the Left channel is bypassing the PW-6 and the Right channel is going through the PW-6 from A Right to B Right. It looks mostly the same except now the Right channel has a little 60hz glitch:
Things are looking pretty encouraging so far. The next thing to look at was the THD/SNR. Here the Left Channel is bypassing the PW-6 and the Right channel is going through the PW-6 from A Right to B Right.
While the Right Channel is noisier than the Left, it is still pretty insignificant- at least for what I would be A/B testing, which are typically older amplifiers and speakers.
I then decided to look at the Crosstalk (isolation) with the signal path A-B selected and leakage measured at path C:
Not very good isolation to say the least due to the 60hz leakage. Up to this point I had been using the 12Vdc wall wart that came with the unit. I decided to try to power the PW-6 via the microusb input using a powered usb hub that I have, and that cleaned things up considerably. Here is the Crosstalk (isolation) with the signal path A-B selected and leakage re-measured at path C:
The takeaway is that the supplied 12Vdc wall wart is noisy and should not be used.
I then re-measured the THD/SNR for the A-B path with the Right Channel bypassing the PW-6 and got these results:
The low level noise cleaned up considerably with the powered USB hub adapter, but there was not really any difference going through the PW-6. Pretty much the same for the path going A-C:
Next the frequency response from path A-C was measured and looks pretty much like the path A-B, but without the very small 60hz glitch:
I also measured the crosstalk/isolation between the Left to Right channels for the A-B path. In this case the signal was applied to the Left input with the Right input terminated:
Results were similar with the A-C path. For my uses, I will power the PW6 using a USB battery pack, which gave very similar results to the powered usb hub that I used for the testing. From the manufacturer’s website, the inside of the PW6 looks like this:
Looks like a pretty simple design and pretty much just switching relay paths in and out, which accounts for the good performance as far as THD and Frequency response (IMHO). Since the relays are spec’d at 5A, you could deliver 100w/4Ω or 200w/8Ω, which would be enough for most of the A/B testing/switching one would want to do (at least for me).
All that was left to do was to try the PW6 out. For my 1st test, I hooked up a pair of Klipsch KG2 speakers to a pair of integrated amplifiers: a vintage NAD 3130 and the Aiyima A07. Both were fed with the same (split) signal from a Surfans F20 music player. Each amplifier’s gain was adjusted to give the same SPL from the KG2’s using REW to generate pink/white noise and measuring the SPL with a calibrated microphone. I started off with a 60dB SPL and heard no difference when switching between the amps (not really my intent, just a side note). All that told me I had switched amps was the sound of a relay clicking and the appropriate selection in the display. I recalibrated for a 70dB SPL, and still heard no difference or nuances when switching- I used several different types of music. The relays are spec’d for a 5ms switching time, but I was not able to notice that I had switched amps other than the sound of the relay clicking, which probably would not be heard if you were doing the test at a louder level. The display is very easy to read and the remote works well (only the ON/OFF,1 & 2 keys are functional). Granted the KG2’s may not be the discerning speakers, but they did allow for some listening tests.
I tried another test as I had a pair of “vintage, high end” monoblock amps as well as a “vintage” small footprint stereo amp (all are solid state). One of the vintage monoblocks sold for 10x the cost of the stereo amp. An RC11 RCA volume control (reviewed by Amir), connected between one of the preamps outputs and the Stereo amp, was used to match the levels as it had more gain. Two sets of speakers were used, as well as a variety of listening material. I was unable to hear any difference between the sounds of the amplifiers. At little louder listening levels, when you could not hear the switcher’s relay click, and you would not have known that you switched amps- probably not a surprise to ASR readers. I dumped as much as about 100w/4ohms into the speakers and the PW-6 did fine. Maybe younger ears would hear some small nuances…..
The next “test” for the PW-6 was to use it to A/B two (single) speakers, that were placed next to each other. A power amp that had gain controls to was used to balance each speaker using pink random noise with a calibrated microphone and REW software. The Right Channel was sent to the “C” output/speaker (a Wilson Watt/Puppy) and the Left Channel was sent to the” B” output/speaker (a KEF 107). Though this test could not compare imaging, it definitely was useful to determine the tonal differences between the two and to a certain extent, the soundstage deltas. The switching of the relay(s) is typically not heard if the volume of the music at a certain level.
Based on what I measured and heard, I think the NJ&FXAUDIO PW-6 would work well for some amplifier/speaker switching and basic A/B testing, particularly at its <$100 price point. It can certainly be used as a “truth detector” of sorts and allow someone to evaluate the sound between one amp/preamp/speaker vs. another!
I later found out that Amir had already done a review of the Douk VU3: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/douk-vu3-review-vu-meters.26827/.
I did not have the budget to spend $1400 on the Van Alstine a/b/x comparator, and eventually came across the PW-6:
I purchased it on Ebay for about $70 (at the time): https://www.ebay.com/itm/263331053496 .It appears to be part of the Douk Audio family. It comes with a small remote and a 12vdc wall wart. The PW-6 weighs a bit more than a pound and is constructed with what I am guessing is aluminum for the housing- it has a nice solid feel to it. It is approximately 7”x5”x1.5”. The connectors are standard banana jack/wire/spade lugs, with 0.75” spacings. There is not a lot of room between them so using really large spade lugs may be a problem; however, all my testing was done using banana jacks and I had no problems. I used the banana to rca adapters I had built for my testing of the Douk VU3:
I used a QuantAsylum QA402 Audio Analyzer for my measurements, and used a 2vrms (6dBV) signal level for my testing. The RCA test cables are 4’ long, and the frequency span for all measurements was 20hz-20khz. The first measurement was to check the frequency response. The Right channel (in red) has the QA402 input and output cables connected together with an rca barrel adapter, so it is bypassing the PW-6. There is very little difference between the two, though you can see just a small amount of 60hz on the Left channel (yellow) which is going from A Left to B Left:
For the next plot, the Left channel is bypassing the PW-6 and the Right channel is going through the PW-6 from A Right to B Right. It looks mostly the same except now the Right channel has a little 60hz glitch:
Things are looking pretty encouraging so far. The next thing to look at was the THD/SNR. Here the Left Channel is bypassing the PW-6 and the Right channel is going through the PW-6 from A Right to B Right.
While the Right Channel is noisier than the Left, it is still pretty insignificant- at least for what I would be A/B testing, which are typically older amplifiers and speakers.
I then decided to look at the Crosstalk (isolation) with the signal path A-B selected and leakage measured at path C:
Not very good isolation to say the least due to the 60hz leakage. Up to this point I had been using the 12Vdc wall wart that came with the unit. I decided to try to power the PW-6 via the microusb input using a powered usb hub that I have, and that cleaned things up considerably. Here is the Crosstalk (isolation) with the signal path A-B selected and leakage re-measured at path C:
The takeaway is that the supplied 12Vdc wall wart is noisy and should not be used.
I then re-measured the THD/SNR for the A-B path with the Right Channel bypassing the PW-6 and got these results:
The low level noise cleaned up considerably with the powered USB hub adapter, but there was not really any difference going through the PW-6. Pretty much the same for the path going A-C:
Next the frequency response from path A-C was measured and looks pretty much like the path A-B, but without the very small 60hz glitch:
I also measured the crosstalk/isolation between the Left to Right channels for the A-B path. In this case the signal was applied to the Left input with the Right input terminated:
Results were similar with the A-C path. For my uses, I will power the PW6 using a USB battery pack, which gave very similar results to the powered usb hub that I used for the testing. From the manufacturer’s website, the inside of the PW6 looks like this:
Looks like a pretty simple design and pretty much just switching relay paths in and out, which accounts for the good performance as far as THD and Frequency response (IMHO). Since the relays are spec’d at 5A, you could deliver 100w/4Ω or 200w/8Ω, which would be enough for most of the A/B testing/switching one would want to do (at least for me).
All that was left to do was to try the PW6 out. For my 1st test, I hooked up a pair of Klipsch KG2 speakers to a pair of integrated amplifiers: a vintage NAD 3130 and the Aiyima A07. Both were fed with the same (split) signal from a Surfans F20 music player. Each amplifier’s gain was adjusted to give the same SPL from the KG2’s using REW to generate pink/white noise and measuring the SPL with a calibrated microphone. I started off with a 60dB SPL and heard no difference when switching between the amps (not really my intent, just a side note). All that told me I had switched amps was the sound of a relay clicking and the appropriate selection in the display. I recalibrated for a 70dB SPL, and still heard no difference or nuances when switching- I used several different types of music. The relays are spec’d for a 5ms switching time, but I was not able to notice that I had switched amps other than the sound of the relay clicking, which probably would not be heard if you were doing the test at a louder level. The display is very easy to read and the remote works well (only the ON/OFF,1 & 2 keys are functional). Granted the KG2’s may not be the discerning speakers, but they did allow for some listening tests.
I tried another test as I had a pair of “vintage, high end” monoblock amps as well as a “vintage” small footprint stereo amp (all are solid state). One of the vintage monoblocks sold for 10x the cost of the stereo amp. An RC11 RCA volume control (reviewed by Amir), connected between one of the preamps outputs and the Stereo amp, was used to match the levels as it had more gain. Two sets of speakers were used, as well as a variety of listening material. I was unable to hear any difference between the sounds of the amplifiers. At little louder listening levels, when you could not hear the switcher’s relay click, and you would not have known that you switched amps- probably not a surprise to ASR readers. I dumped as much as about 100w/4ohms into the speakers and the PW-6 did fine. Maybe younger ears would hear some small nuances…..
The next “test” for the PW-6 was to use it to A/B two (single) speakers, that were placed next to each other. A power amp that had gain controls to was used to balance each speaker using pink random noise with a calibrated microphone and REW software. The Right Channel was sent to the “C” output/speaker (a Wilson Watt/Puppy) and the Left Channel was sent to the” B” output/speaker (a KEF 107). Though this test could not compare imaging, it definitely was useful to determine the tonal differences between the two and to a certain extent, the soundstage deltas. The switching of the relay(s) is typically not heard if the volume of the music at a certain level.
Based on what I measured and heard, I think the NJ&FXAUDIO PW-6 would work well for some amplifier/speaker switching and basic A/B testing, particularly at its <$100 price point. It can certainly be used as a “truth detector” of sorts and allow someone to evaluate the sound between one amp/preamp/speaker vs. another!