Thanks for this clear and detailed explanation.Because [...]
Thanks for this clear and detailed explanation.Because [...]
That’s where people’s subjectivity has to come into it. You have to have your own preference for your own slope in room. In my opinion the blade would be way nicer to listen to all day. The Genelecs would certainly sound more detailed and more “lean-in” but would get tiring, as studio marketed monitors tend to do.Looks a bit dark actually, compared to stuff like the F208 and 8341A:
View attachment 255936
Yes for the people who prefers a darker tonality than absolute neutral presentation with perfect imaging with the penality of a narrower soundstage than a non coaxial speaker.Predicted in-room response looks picture perfect. Maybe ruler straight on-axis didn’t feel right for this speaker?
I still think it’s one of the best speakers in the world.
Kefs cannot produce the cymbals exactly like how they are in the recording unless you eq it up. Agreed it’s pleasant, but then again it’s not how it is in the recording.That’s where people’s subjectivity has to come into it. You have to have your own preference for your own slope in room. In my opinion the blade would be way nicer to listen to all day. The Genelecs would certainly sound more detailed and more “lean-in” but would get tiring, as studio marketed monitors tend to do.
There’s no perfect estimated in room response slope. Slope.
Yes but the combined response is still dropping down, one of two dbs below the 0db line. For 26000 they better be ruler flat and everything has to be perfect. Unless someone is a die hard fan boy this is similar performance what you can get from a 3500 euros, Neumann kh150
Imo the best Kef to get would be the reference metas. I have listened to blade ones, not metas and I personally liked the reference metas a lot more than them
With a high or low directivity index though?I prefer speakers be anechoically flat since I think that's the best starting point,
Again, it’s not “neutral”, And agreed KEF knew it would sound “easy” on ears. Cymbals should sound a bit harsh, on kefs it’s nice easy, you hear them with tiny nuances but that shimmer, glare it’s not there. Some records have already given thought of this and they make it smooth in those recordings itself. Those recordings would sound extra dull on kefs. as people grow old, their high frequency hearing gets bad and then it becomes even dull.I think that response looks awesome. This is very close to how we voice our speakers, and it doesn't sound dark in-room, it sounds natural and right. I'm pretty sure Kef knew exactly what they were doing when voicing this.
Similarly in a good less reflecting room, you don’t need a speaker which is dull reproducing cymbals. Many folks want to hear that air, want it to shimmer, flash when a cymbal is hit.With a high or low directivity index though?
Wide dispersion or narrow dispersion?
If you have a speaker that is very wide dispersion, say the philharmonic BMRs, I guarantee you you don't want the on axis to be flat, especially if you're listening in a room with hardwood polished floors, bare walls and ceilings and very little furniture.
You should think about the room before the speaker. Right I'm done derailing this thread
How do you know how the cymbals in the recording should sound?Kefs cannot produce the cymbals exactly like how they are in the recording unless you eq it up. Agreed it’s pleasant, but then again it’s not how it is in the recording.
Most folks who end up buying these won’t care about eqing. As per this logic, there are 1000s of “pleasant” sounding speakers in this world each of them thinking this is how I make my speakers fatigue free.
Good thing is Kef can be eqed, but most others cannot be.
By that logic, you can listen to any 20 dollar speaker assuming that’s how it’s there in that recording.How do you know how the cymbals in the recording should sound?
Keith
With a high or low directivity index though?
Wide dispersion or narrow dispersion?
If you have a speaker that is very wide dispersion, say the philharmonic BMRs, I guarantee you you don't want the on axis to be flat, especially if you're listening in a room with hardwood polished floors, bare walls and ceilings and very little furniture.
You should think about the room before the speaker. Right I'm done derailing this threa
The spinorama site has EQ for the Blade Two Metas to give you an idea.But like I mentioned earlier it’s equable, but I wonder what kind of filter do we need to fix an entire tilt to the right.
Where do I say the BMR's are tilted? Sorry, I wasn't meant to be ranting at you; it was meant to be aimed at the reader. (Replace "you have" with "one was to")Where did you get the idea that BMRs are tilted? Cause.they aren't.
Not sure who this weird ass rant is aimed at either. Maybe you want someone else, because nothing you wrote pertains to me.
For sure - theres another factor in the in-room tilt preference factors. The listeners hearing ability (and/or age).Again, it’s not “neutral”, And agreed KEF knew it would sound “easy” on ears. Cymbals should sound a bit harsh, on kefs it’s nice easy, you hear them with tiny nuances but that shimmer, glare it’s not there. Some records have already given thought of this and they make it smooth in those recordings itself. Those recordings would sound extra dull on kefs. as people grow old, their high frequency hearing gets bad and then it becomes even dull.
But like I mentioned earlier it’s equable, but I wonder what kind of filter do we need to fix an entire tilt to the right.
Again, it’s not “neutral”, And agreed KEF knew it would sound “easy” on ears. Cymbals should sound a bit harsh, on kefs it’s nice easy, you hear them with tiny nuances but that shimmer, glare it’s not there. Some records have already given thought of this and they make it smooth in those recordings itself. Those recordings would sound extra dull on kefs. as people grow old, their high frequency hearing gets bad and then it becomes even dull.
But like I mentioned earlier it’s equable, but I wonder what kind of filter do we need to fix an entire tilt to the right.
The spinorama site has EQ for the Blade Two Metas to give you an idea.
EQ for KEF Blade 2 Meta computed from Vendors-KEF data
Generated from http://github.com/pierreaubert/spinorama/generate_peqs.py v0.18
Dated: 2023-01-03-23:26:04
Preamp: -1.7 dB
Filter 1: ON PK Fc 199 Hz Gain -1.24 dB Q 0.22
Filter 2: ON PK Fc 6077 Hz Gain +1.49 dB Q 0.36
Filter 3: ON PK Fc 835 Hz Gain -0.50 dB Q 2.93
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 176 Hz Gain +0.69 dB Q 2.95
Filter 5: ON PK Fc 454 Hz Gain +0.57 dB Q 2.90
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 243 Hz Gain -0.54 dB Q 2.88
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 80 Hz Gain -0.50 dB Q 0.29
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 208 Hz Gain +0.55 dB Q 0.91
Filter 9: ON PK Fc 1681 Hz Gain +0.50 dB Q 2.95
do you mean this tuning is then intentional ?I think you are expecting to understand more than is possible from a graph. You can not "see" by the graph alone whether the speaker will sound bright, dark or just right. (talking about moderate deviations like the speaker in question). I have not heard the Blade 2, so I don't know if it sounds neutral or slightly dark.
We can also speculate that Kef has made some assumptions around the fact that most rooms someone would put the Blade 2 in, likely wouldn't be small with 80s style decoration with lots of furniture and wall-to-wall carpet. On the contrary it is likely to be relatively large, with minimal decoration with numerous hard surfaces. So it would make sense to give the speaker the highest likelyhood of sounding good in the environment it's most likely to be played in.
And what is "neutral"? The in-room tilt that sounds best will not be the same in all rooms. It's a pretty widespread understanding in the industry that anechoically flat is neutral and therefore the only thing that could be thought of as accurate and correct. While I'm not directly contesting that, we also know that especially the 100-300hz area suffers from several and often wide dips in the majority of rooms, due to reflections that are not present in an anechoic chamber. A subtle reinforcement of this range sounds better, fuller and more accurate in all the rooms we've tested and across a wide range of music.
do you mean this tuning is then intentional ?