• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping DM7 8-Channel DAC Review

Rate this DAC:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 7 2.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 18 5.6%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther

    Votes: 52 16.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 244 76.0%

  • Total voters
    321

wisechoice

Active Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2021
Messages
155
Likes
141
Thanks for the explanation. It appears to be more of a product for computer hobbyists than for home theater or immersive music enthusiasts.
I'm not sure I agree that it's not a product for immersive music enthusiasts, it just depends on your approach and budget. The balanced outputs, DSD and unified volume control with remote make it very attractive IMO, especially at this price point.
 

Doodski

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 9, 2019
Messages
21,605
Likes
21,883
Location
Canada
Well this solves the 7 mystery :facepalm:


… not ;)
Never mind when I worked selling home audio gear to new Chinese immigrants and visitors they wanted the prices to be 8's. Like $888.88 or $988.88 instead of $999.99 I never argued I just wrote the number down on paper to make sure we understood and passed it to them so they could say OK. :D
 

NoteMakoti

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2021
Messages
55
Likes
145
Forgive me if this is a dumb question, but could you hook this up to an AVR to get the benefits of the host machine, but with a good DAC?
 

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,363
Location
Netherlands
Forgive me if this is a dumb question, but could you hook this up to an AVR to get the benefits of the host machine, but with a good DAC?
Nope. No AVR has the capability to drive USB DACs. It would also involve another batch of ASRCs to cross to the USB clock domain. That's a lot of added complexity.
 

Toku

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
2,433
Likes
2,834
Location
Japan
I'm struggling to understand how this device can be used in a multichannel surround system. Can it do anything that can or cannot be done by an AVR or surround processor? Is there software that allows it to be used as a DSP incorporating high-pass and low-pass filters, PEQ, channel levels, phase and delay so that it acts like a miniDSP or Dayton Audio DSP-408 but with digital input? How do I get a Dolby Digital 7.1 stream into it? Can it decode that? (Obviously it doesn't support Dolby Atmos in any way, as far as I can see.)
DM7 doesn't have any of the features you mentioned.
This product is a product that converts 8 channels into analog separately using the DAC function of 8 channels of the DAC chip.
Only pure 2ch stereo signal can be input to the USB input. It cannot operate with a mixed signal such as Dolby.
 

DavidMcRoy

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Messages
576
Likes
997
I'm not sure I agree that it's not a product for immersive music enthusiasts, it just depends on your approach and budget. The balanced outputs, DSD and unified volume control with remote make it very attractive IMO, especially at this price point.
I get that, and that's great for anyone with the patience, but it strikes me as a rather kludgy approach. It reminds me of the early 2000s when we broadcasters had to put together an over-the-air digital TV infrastructure to meet FCC deadlines for getting something on the air tout suite. We had to deal with many multiple vendors to cobble together something that would work. It was far from a turnkey project. What the world needs is a "popular priced" 7.1.4 AV switcher/processor with DAC performance that approaches this box and that supports Dolby Atmos. I've been limping along with the pre-outs of a dodgy Pioneer AVR for that for too long.
 

Matias

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,086
Likes
10,945
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
What the world needs is a Raspberry Pi running an opensource software that supports all codecs, receiving HDMI eARC input and sending multichannel audio in its USB output, with a web interface to set up channel levels, high/low pass filters and even some PEQ or room correction.

Then we would have a great solution for TV => Raspberry Pi decoding => multichannel DAC => multichannel amp for our home theaters.
 

mdsimon2

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Messages
2,515
Likes
3,369
Location
Detroit, MI
For all those lamenting the lack of physical inputs if you are running CamillaDSP it is very easy to add a SPDIF input with a device like this -> https://hifimediy.com/product/s2-digi/. Just set the hifimediy as your capture device and the DM7 as your playback device and enable async resampling and rate adjust and CamillaDSP will bridge the clock domains. Poor man’s Okto at half the price.

Michael
 

Music1969

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
4,676
Likes
2,849
@JohnYang1997

Some TRS output DACS (pro audio interfaces) also support TS output

Is this the case here with DM7 ?

Important to know if connecting DM7 is connected to subwoofer/s with only RCA input...

For example RME Fireface UC has 1/4" output that supports both TRS (balanced) and TS (unbalance) as per below:



index.php
 

mdsimon2

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Messages
2,515
Likes
3,369
Location
Detroit, MI
Problem is none of them support IR remote control. They are made for use where you can reach the knobs.

But for us sitting 10+ feet back on a couch, need IR remote control for volume. Critical.

Like Okto DAC8 Pro has. And now this.

While I agree that the Topping having IR control is nice there are two rather simple ways to add IR control / display to a pro audio interface.

1) Add a miniDSP Flex digital output upstream of a pro audio interface with SPDIF input. Now you have source selection, IR control and display. Can easily do DSP using software between the SPDIF input of the pro audio interface and any of the output channels (digital and analog).

2) Build the DIY raspberry pi / CamillaDSP option linked in my signature. Now you have IR control and display that can be used with any USB DAC and has other very nice features like web based control.

It all depends on what you need, I think a pro audio interface provides more bang for the buck but the Topping seems priced well as a more consumer friendly simple option.

Michael
 

Music1969

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
4,676
Likes
2,849
1) Add a miniDSP Flex digital output upstream of a pro audio interface with SPDIF input. Now you have source selection, IR control and display. Can easily do DSP using software between the SPDIF input of the pro audio interface and any of the output channels (digital and analog).

This works but is clunkly. DAC8 Pro and DM7 are more elegant solutions (less boxes)

2) Build the DIY raspberry pi / CamillaDSP option linked in my signature. Now you have IR control and display that can be used with any USB DAC and has other very nice features like web based control.

Another box and I already use Audiolense XO + HQPlayer for my DSP. Other people also use other DSP options.

DAC8 Pro and DM7 simply allow more flexibility with less boxes, with IR volume control control.

It all depends on what you need, I think a pro audio interface provides more bang for the buck but the Topping seems priced well as a more consumer friendly simple option.

Correct, we all have difference needs (me too) so it makes no sense for us to say our way is the best way.

But there's a reason Okto has been so popular with the multichannel / DSP crossover crowd - the metal Apple remote control

DM7 will be very popular for same crowd
 

MCH

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 10, 2021
Messages
2,652
Likes
2,260
While I agree that the Topping having IR control is nice there are two rather simple ways to add IR control / display to a pro audio interface.

1) Add a miniDSP Flex digital output upstream of a pro audio interface with SPDIF input. Now you have source selection, IR control and display. Can easily do DSP using software between the SPDIF input of the pro audio interface and any of the output channels (digital and analog).

2) Build the DIY raspberry pi / CamillaDSP option linked in my signature. Now you have IR control and display that can be used with any USB DAC and has other very nice features like web based control.

It all depends on what you need, I think a pro audio interface provides more bang for the buck but the Topping seems priced well as a more consumer friendly simple option.

Michael
Agree Michael, but even for a camilladsp setup this topping dac is the perfect component for dac tasks (provided it works with linux).
Saves you the hurdle of building the display, the box to hold it and the remote, that are probably the "less easy" parts of the endeavour, gives you sota performance, gor the ones dreaming of sinad numbers, and doesn't cost much much more than other 8+ channel options.
As you said, additional inputs can be added easy and cheap.
 

thorvat

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2021
Messages
323
Likes
387
Frankly I don't see many folks using this device to build custom AVR as that would require a device that would have arcHDMI input, than do the decoding to finally send multichannel audio over USB. I'm not aware that such device exists and I can think of several reasons why. Typical AV processor already has mucltichannel DAC device in it and some of them will accept USB input for it.

What you can do with this device is build yourself a cheap box based on say RPI4 running music player of your choice and some DSP software (CamillaDSP, bruteFIR, ..). Then you can do several things with it:

- integrate your SWs in a professional manner with your fronts (HP filter for mains, LP for subs and proper XO with correct phase adjustment between them)
- build your own active speaker ystem
- convert your passive speaker system into active
- add speaker EQ to any of the above
- add room EQ to any of the above
 
Last edited:

dartinbout

Active Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
272
Likes
277
This device is obviously worthless. It does not turn into a ham sandwich at midnight. Back to the drawing board Mr. Yang. (/s)
 

Jimbob54

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
11,111
Likes
14,774
I get that. It is the number 7 that I don't get.
7 for Topping usually means there may be a superior 9 version. Though that is far from definite. There was never a DX9. Or an A70
 

kenshone

Active Member
Joined
May 15, 2022
Messages
198
Likes
103
Thanks for a 12v trigger and build-in power supply! But with only a USB input, will this even work with a MiniDSP Flex Digital? That would be a perfect stack if you ask me!

Sidenote for @amirm : The jitter graph seems broken. There is nothing recorded in the 100-140dB band, no skirt around the signal... It looks like your overpriced measuring equipment was testing an internal loop.

To those who want to integrate MiniDSP, you could use something like this https://www.minidsp.com/products/dirac-series/ddrc-88a.

Chain would be PC -> DM7 -> DDRC-88A -> Amplification -> Speakers.

Alternatively, if you want to keep a fully balanced audio chain and DSP each channel, I believe you could use software like JRiver (which you can optionally integrate with Dirac Live Multichannel).
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom