What they were trying to accomplish for audio applications?Maybe with an RF network analyzer you'd see something interesting? Wouldn't matter for audio, but might shed light on what they were trying to accomplish.
What they were trying to accomplish for audio applications?Maybe with an RF network analyzer you'd see something interesting? Wouldn't matter for audio, but might shed light on what they were trying to accomplish.
Unless it's blow job cables you're referring to?I thought BJC was above this sort of high priced stuff.
Lots of companies are genuine in their intention to sell you whatever....and some of the 'phool stuff is said to be helmed by "true believers".Thought provoking review. No surprise that the cable doesn't make any difference!
What's interesting is that the company seems genuine in its intention. Not 'snake oil' but some sort of fundamental blindness to the basic issue that there's just nothing to hear.
Astounding waste of time and money.
Or, as Amir says, they just need to run proper blind tests and then we can look again.
It would take I'm guessing ~26 of them would be required to be able to afford this $785.00 cable. Too rich for my blood...lolUnless it's blow job cables you're referring to?
I sure wish we had the laugh emojis hereIt would take I'm guessing ~26 of them would be required to be able to afford this $785.00 cable. Too rich for my blood...lol
Same here. I voted Poor and it saddens me to do so.I thought BJC was above this sort of high priced stuff.
Oof.It would take I'm guessing ~26 of them would be required to be able to afford this $785.00 cable. Too rich for my blood...lol
Me too, Amir is soooo stingy with his emojis selection. LOLI sure wish we had the laugh emojis here
And that's because of the all-too-common baseline assumption that, "if I can hear it with sighted listening, it's in the sound waves".we see no data that backs Iconoclast cables sounding different. How could that be after tons of measurements and formulas in the company white paper? Well, the heart of it is this statement at the end of one:
The fact that cables sound difference was taken as a given.
I don't even want to go into the "emoji menu".....just would prefer like/dislike/funny/optimistic type choices as many fora haveMe too, Amir is soooo stingy with his emojis selection. LOL
Blue Jeans always seems to find itself at the center of these things.I thought BJC was above this sort of high priced stuff.
ASR still gets peeps here after all these reviews about cables that are thinking the science cannot measure and determine if a cable is good or bad. It's as if they think cable technology is still a developing technology and the musical waveform is not understood.How many more times do we need AmirM to tell us if you get punched in the face it hurts.
Enough with the ”it's just wire“ already. We get the picture.
My internet allergies just went wild with the mention of that superd*ck Lavorgna. I can think of few people in audio I think less of....and they're mostly on staff with him too.Blue Jeans always seems to find itself at the center of these things.
Expert electrical analysis: $340 audiophile cables test “marginal”
Listeners couldn't distinguish them from spec-failing, garbage-quality cables.arstechnica.comCables, Bits, and Noise: How Cables Can Make A Sound Difference | AudioStream
"It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see." Henry David Thoreauweb.archive.org
Naturally, Michael "Bits are not Bits" Lavorgna fails to see the forest for the trees.
I have some of those and they don't null any better than the one's Amir tested. Don't null worse either.I'll just stick with my $12 Monoprice XLR cables
I think they were trying to disassociate themselves directly from this expensive wire and at the same time keeping themselves in the loop to profit from this expensive wire. Don't need RF even in the terahertz range to figure that out.Maybe with an RF network analyzer you'd see something interesting? Wouldn't matter for audio, but might shed light on what they were trying to accomplish.
If your BJ's are $30 per, you need to hang around some classier service providers. You can catch something at the bargain basements you know.It would take I'm guessing ~26 of them would be required to be able to afford this $785.00 cable. Too rich for my blood...lol
Despite the annoyance and inconvenience of having to use archive.org to cite his drivel, I ultimately derive a sublime pleasure from this exercise. I'm not merely remembering that he got shit-canned. The extra key strokes, the additional googling--my whole being participates in a remembrance ceremony.My internet allergies just went wild with the mention of that superd*ck Lavorgna. I can think of few people in audio I think less of....and they're mostly on staff with him too.