If i had strong negative feelings about Windows i would surely switch to a different OS, after all there are good alternatives.
I used linux exclusively for about 10 years, it's still my favorite OS because of it's customizability, but eventually i got fed up with the recurring manual maintenance. I used OSX for about 4 years but it wasn't for me, i never really felt at home in their philosophy. I've also used Chrome OS devices for a few years which were pretty nice, and i have a large Android tablet with keyboard that is surprisingly flexible and powerful, i could technically use that as my sole machine.
On my main laptop i switched back from linux to Windows when Win10 arrived with WSL and it just worked™, i haven't really felt the need for anything else since.
However if things started annoying me greatly or breaking all the time, then surely i would just move again to one of the alternatives, instead of going online and complain about Windows not being what i want it to be. That just feels like a waste of time and energy.
Life's too short to spend your time complaining instead of just fixing the things that bother you.
First, pointing out problems in something is not 'complaining instead of fixing'. I don't know why you would think that? And even if it was, fixing is not an option. How can anyone 'fix' something like Windows? The source code is proprietary, and hidden.
A 'waste of time and energy'? In fact, the entire premise of ASR is to 'point out' shoddy engineering, or good engineering, as the case may be. Is that 'complaining'? Is that a 'waste of time and energy?' If criticizing an engineering project (even if it is the 'human engineering' of a user interface, one running on probably 90% of the desktops in the world), is a waste of time, then I suppose that criticizing someone who is criticizing it in the first place is doubly wasting their time?
Second, WSL (I presume you are not talking about the World Surf League, but that would be less ironic, if you were) is an interesting thing. It is a 'good thing' on its face, however we must remember how it was not that long ago when Steve Ballmer was telling anyone who would listen to him (and he was hoping that everyone would) that Linux was a cancer. He used those words. At the time, as you also no doubt recall, MS was accused of 'backdoor funding' what was left of the old Santa Cruz Operation, in their attempts to shake down (i.e., destroy) Linux, in the courts. Linux survived no thanks to MS, but rather because of IBM, Novell/Suse, and Red Hat. If it was up to Ballmer, there would be no WSL. But you could still surf the North Shore, so you'd have that going for you. LOL
The mainstream press (ZDNet, PC World, and even the generally helpful Tom's Hardware) have all panned the Win 11 user interface (among other things). Were they wasting their time?
What they won't do, however, is get Nadella on the horn and ask him a few simple questions. Ask him why MS continues to muck things up so badly, when they really don't have to? Ask him what's the reason for it? Or ask if there even is a reason? Maybe, if they did, and if he had the 'nads to respond, he would just say, "If you don't like it, fix it if it bothers you. Or migrate to OS/2. Or build your own OS." Or maybe he would just say, "I have no idea. It's just the way we roll. Why don't you get a life? Why are you bothering me with stuff I don't care about?"