- Joined
- Oct 18, 2019
- Messages
- 72
- Likes
- 114
How did we even get to people defending the 115hz peak? Even Amirs review relies on the consumer fixing this massive fault in the expensive speaker.
It doesnt work any better closer to a wall, if you want a bass response that is helped by close to wall placement you design a slow rolloff, like kef ls50 for example (that was getting a bad review for that reason).
Even if the peak was tuned to a very specific back wall cancellation (where are the placement instructions from wilson?) it wouldnt work. You dont fix a cancellation by filling it with more energy, its a waste of output. The more you put in the stronger the out of phase wave gets as well.
What you could do is giving specific placement instructions and adding an absorber behind the speaker, closer to the wall means higher frequency cancellation and thinner absorbtion needed. Of course this would requier another bass tuning as described above.
It doesnt work any better closer to a wall, if you want a bass response that is helped by close to wall placement you design a slow rolloff, like kef ls50 for example (that was getting a bad review for that reason).
Even if the peak was tuned to a very specific back wall cancellation (where are the placement instructions from wilson?) it wouldnt work. You dont fix a cancellation by filling it with more energy, its a waste of output. The more you put in the stronger the out of phase wave gets as well.
What you could do is giving specific placement instructions and adding an absorber behind the speaker, closer to the wall means higher frequency cancellation and thinner absorbtion needed. Of course this would requier another bass tuning as described above.
Last edited: