Are we letting the subjective impressions prevail over the poor measurements? I mean, this speaker is nowhere near full range.
This has pretty much always been the case. You can think of the Olive score as the "objective score" and the Panther score as the "subjective score". I like having both. Keep in mind the "poll panther score" is more just a subjective take on the objective measurements, which is completely different than Amir's panther score.
The disconnect between the two here is really interesting. I dare say these are the worst measurements we've ever seen(price considered). We've seen $80/pair speakers that measure better and still don't get the recommendation.
I'm glad Amir gives his honest impression, though. Better that then him just saying everything that measures good sounds good(and vice versa). I do wonder how large a role subconscious bias plays here though.
My only fear is this review will be used as evidence that measurements don't matter as much as Toole/Olive want us to believe; and it'll actually be be a decent argument. If a speaker can measure this terrible(lots of resonances, exaggerated upper bass, no deep bass, poor directivity, not great distortion), cost this much, and still sound good enough to get a recommendation, how important can good measurements really be?