• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Why people lean towards planar headphones as they are mostly Not following the specific Target

KehaDNb

Active Member
Joined
May 5, 2022
Messages
223
Likes
48
Hi, I can’t understand why people are drawn to planar magnetic headphones as they are mostly Not following any target . Can someone explain and bring some light. Maybe u have to look behind the curtains to understand.
 

TomB19

Active Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Messages
137
Likes
102
Planars are wonderfully resolving. Not sure what you mean by not following any target.

I've had my Hifiman Sundaras for about a year. I have two pair of Sennheiser (HD58X and HD650) that I will never wear again. I still like the Senns but why would I spend an evening with a mid place contestant when I could spend all of my time with the beauty pageant winner.
 

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
3,052
Likes
4,023
Most headphones at any price are not shooting for, or following, a target curve. And different people have different sound preferences and different style & brand preferences, etc. Audiophools like whatever is the most expensive! :D :D :D
 

digitalfrost

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 22, 2018
Messages
1,544
Likes
3,179
Location
Palatinate, Germany
Planars are wonderfully resolving. Not sure what you mean by not following any target.

I've had my Hifiman Sundaras for about a year. I have two pair of Sennheiser (HD58X and HD650) that I will never wear again. I still like the Senns but why would I spend an evening with a mid place contestant when I could spend all of my time with the beauty pageant winner.
I really got into IEMs last year. My current ones have 7 (!) drivers in a single chassis and yet I'm still curious about trying planars. They got pretty large cases though.
 

LightninBoy

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
723
Likes
1,475
Location
St. Paul, MN
Hi, I can’t understand why people are drawn to planar magnetic headphones as they are mostly Not following any target . Can someone explain and bring some light. Maybe u have to look behind the curtains to understand.
Because they believe in things like "resolving".
 

Jds81

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
50
Likes
39
I have a pair of planar as my main set right now, and looking at another. I was first attracted to them because I like odd mechanical things. I had no inkling of preference curves at the time. I did think I was preferable to studio monitor type sound. Subjective reviews were good. The set in question is Dan Clark's original product, the Mr Speakers Mad Dog. Based on the fostex t50rp. Looking at his newer offerings.
Many years later, I have found so much more information here. Now Dan Clark is one of the most on target for the Harman curve. I hope to send my Mad Dogs to Amir for measurements, though I am not sure it'd be that helpful for the community. Would be a cool bit of history to see where things started with a top pick headphone maker.
 

ADU

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Messages
1,587
Likes
1,086
Hi, I can’t understand why people are drawn to planar magnetic headphones as they are mostly Not following any target . Can someone explain and bring some light. Maybe u have to look behind the curtains to understand.

Never owned a planar headphone. But not everyone likes, prefers, or wants a headphone with as much bass as the Harman target.

Alot of audiophiles are older men with hearing loss in the upper midrange and treble frequencies. Or who suffer from hidden hearing loss. Either condition could potentially bias them towards a headphone with less emphasis and masking from the lower frequencies.

Good sub-bass extension is also difficult to achieve on any open headphone. And most open planars will actually perform better in this area than open dynamic headphones. Planar headphones also have less distortion in the bass, making it easier to shelve the lower frequencies up with EQ.

I don't understand all the physics behind planar headphones (Tyll Hertsen's articles for Inner Fidelity could maybe tell you more about that). But based on the frequency response plots, it appears that they may naturally tend towards a very linear response in the lower frequencies. Which some people actually like! And which would require some type of additional tonal distortion to tune or boost the bass levels up closer to the Harman target.

It probably wouldn't be difficult to add this kind of a bass boost to a planar headphone with some type of internal circuit or DSP. But that would be considered "cheating" by most audiophiles, headphone enthusiasts, modders, and also many professional sound engineers. Most of these folks prefer headphones that are acoustically pure. And prefer to make any necessary adjustments to their tonal balance with their own software, mods, or equalizers.

Hopefully this helped to pull back yer curtains a bit more.
 
Last edited:

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
16,102
Likes
36,621
Location
The Neitherlands
Hi, I can’t understand why people are drawn to planar magnetic headphones as they are mostly Not following any target . Can someone explain and bring some light. Maybe u have to look behind the curtains to understand.

DCA Stealth is following Harman target closely.
Planar is very easy to EQ without getting in distortion so there's that as well.

I heard good and bad planars and good and bad dynamics so SQ is not 'limited' to a type of driver but rather the implementation of it (as well as tuning using pads and others means)

besides...

index.php
 
Last edited:

Xombul

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 1, 2019
Messages
123
Likes
129
Location
France
I really love hifiman HE 400se planars. They are cheap, resolving and quite easy to drive. It is not difficult to EQ headphones and meet the the response curve you like. You can use Wavelet, Camilla DSP freewares for instance
 

PatF

Active Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2022
Messages
195
Likes
210
I think one of factors is that planar headphones are middle ground between electrostatic and dynamic. Only area where planar headphones are not outstanding is width of sound stage. At least in my experience. I had Stax electrostatic and few good dynamic headphones and planar headphones gave me nearly all I wanted.
 

Ashimaru

Active Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2021
Messages
112
Likes
64
For subjectivists, they consider planars to have "technicality". Of course that's funny.

for objectivists generally planar has lower harmonic distortion, including in the bass region. So it can use EQ well if it doesn't follow the target.
 

rlanger

Member
Joined
May 31, 2022
Messages
10
Likes
6
I don't know why others like planars, but for me, I like how they sound. Crazy, right?

I started with a cheap pair of Hifiman HE-4XX, enjoyed the sound, sold them for Sundaras, enjoyed those more, then sold those for Edition XSs and enjoy them even more than the Sundaras. And I'll probably sell the XSs for Aryas one day.

Not once did I check a graph or chart before purchasing any set, but I have EQ'ed all of them to suit my preferences.

I check the graphs and charts after I listen, to get a feel for why I like a particular headphone. I never make purchasing decisions based on them.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom