Barrelhouse Solly
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2020
- Messages
- 606
- Likes
- 648
It kinda depends on what flavor of jazz. The King Oliver 1923 recordings are great although many people call them dated. I like most all periods although I don't care much for fusion. I have a generational anchor in jazz from the '50s and '60s but I love a lot of the pre-WWII stuff. For me, I think my preferences relate to having learned enough guitar chords to form a picture of the music. If I can identify a chord progression, not necessarily each individual chord by name, at least enough to tie it to the structure of the tune, I can appreciate most anything competent players can do with it. The early New Orleans stuff didn't use esoteric progressions. As the music evolved, that changed. There are many jazz albums from the '50s where every song or almost every song, is based on the chords to "I Got Rhythm." E. g. a lot of Charlie Parker. When jazz players play standards you have to be able to tie what they're playing to the melody/chords of the song to enjoy it, IMHO. Then there are players like Monk.