Uh-oh, another member seeing what different good measuring amps sound like (2 of the headphone amps at least)!Finally, yesterday the HE1000 and the V222 arrived.
I had the opportunity to listen to the HE1000 and the MEZE 109pro with 4 headphone amplifiers:
The EF400 sounds decent, but only with the HE1000; structurally, it seems the best made. It's too colorful because it has its own internal DAC; the sound seems harmonious but not at all neutral.
- HIFIMAN EF400
- Topping A30pro
- Topping A70pro
- Violectric V222
A70pro and A30pro are quite similar and exhibit a certain neutrality with plenty of power. The price difference is justified by the available features. The V222 is the one that aesthetically looks worse because it seems to be made for kit assembly components, but it's sturdy and weighs a solid 2kg. I liked it more than the others (I have difficulty expressing myself with audiophile terms devoid of scientific meaning) and I bought it because it was used with a very favorable price and still under warranty.
Thank you everyone for your support![]()
I was referring to the two Toppings as I didn't know how the others measured. Seems pretty foolish to use amps & dacs that aren't transparent.Maybe @widemediaphotography uses the EF400 in NOS mode which shows roll-off in the upper treble and a significant phase shift in the audible range ?
Measurements made by Goldensound (Cameron)
![]()
Hifiman EF400 Review & Measurements
An in-depth review and measurements of the Hifiman EF400 R2R DAC/Amp combo. There's a lot to like about the EF400, but some concerns that listeners may want to be aware of before buying.headphones.com
Yeah, that's my opinion, if people want to try to tune their headphones by using DACS/amps with wonky frequency responses then in my opinion "more fool them". It's just the classic audiofool approach of constantly & blindly changing their audio chain to try to get "synergy" with your headphone - laughable when you have spent some more enlightened times here on ASR.He did state those 2 sounded the same.
There are millions of people not using 'transparent' gear and loving that to bits.
Its just a few thousand that seem to care and are vocal about it?![]()
That seems reasonable to me, and is the approach most people here on ASR would take, but that's a bit at odds with you comparing the sound of your various amps/DACS. If I was you I'd just do as you're saying right now in this post of yours I'm quoting, so in other words you're better off keeping it simple with DAC & amp, so you'd just choose good measuring ones that have the features/power/aesthetics/price that you desire and then use EQ if you want to change sound of your headphones.The concept of transparency is excellent food for thought... To all those who, using audiophile terminology, tell me that this cable or rather that other one significantly alters the sound, I always reply that it is better and more convenient to have a good Digital Signal Processor (DSP) capable of coloring the sound as desired . It is preferable that I attribute the color rather than passively receive it, so I don't have to buy a new component every time I want to change it
I have no intention of introducing DSP or equalizers into my listening chain. If I want to increase the quality of my listening I have to switch to components that have better measurements. However, at my age (57) and the average age of audiophiles, the resolution possibilities of biological auditory systems tend to become increasingly limited. I had published on this forum my measurements of the comparison between 2 AT-VM95E and AT-VM740ML cartridges, where it is shown that most of the differences are found where my hearing no longer reaches (beyond 13 KHz)If I was you I'd just do as you're saying right now in this post of yours I'm quoting, so in other words you're better off keeping it simple with DAC & amp, so you'd just choose good measuring ones that have the features/power/aesthetics/price that you desire and then use EQ if you want to change sound of your headphones.
I don't really agree with that approach, it's non-optimal and self limiting to take a stance that EQ is not to be used, but it is your choice albeit a self-limiting one. It suggests that you've never tried EQ or never tried it properly implemented, or have some inherent bias against EQ that is ultimately irrational.I have no intention of introducing DSP or equalizers into my listening chain. If I want to increase the quality of my listening I have to switch to components that have better measurements. However, at my age (57) and the average age of audiophiles, the resolution possibilities of biological auditory systems tend to become increasingly limited. I had published on this forum my measurements of the comparison between 2 AT-VM95E and AT-VM740ML cartridges, where it is shown that most of the differences are found where my hearing no longer reaches (beyond 13 KHz)![]()
Not a fan of the double cord as well. Doesn't make that much sense either.Alessandro MS-1's (Grado Labs). Inexpensive, easy to drive, leak sound like a sieve and I love them! Had them since 2011, still going strong. Hate the double-cord & swivel post design on that model though, urgh!