mhardy6647
Grand Contributor
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,960
- Likes
- 26,200
Just to make my 'credentials' very clear to you -- I have some perspective on this.I think its great to see everyone with such an open mind here......
As far as "audiophile" tube amps striving for low distortion for the past 50yrs and now regressing, maybe thats because the "audiophile" tube amps with low distortion sound so much like their SS counterparts that people are looking for something that doesnt use 500db of negative feedback, having a sterile, lifeless sound that measures great and steals the very soul from the music?
I know id rather listen to something that sounds good to me, regardless of its measurements, than something that measures "perfectly" but doesnt "do it" for me.
To each their own. Enjoy the music!
My daily driver (listening to Rhiannon Giddens with this now, and it's superb).
![](https://live.staticflickr.com/7910/46602617465_4d5fcaf3ee_b.jpg)
Three-ish watts per channel (at 5-ish percent HD) by single-ended, direct heated 2A3 with a 6SL7 driver stage. Straight out of the RCA Receiving Tube Manual table for resistance coupled amplifiers. Decent output iron. Decent quality tubes. Nothing special, but solidly designed and constructed (not by me, but by one of my hifi buddies*).
JE Labs Simple 45/2A3
There are right ways, and wrong ways, to use vacuum tubes to good effect. This thread is focused on a wrong way.
Fifty dollars? Heck, you could buy three Starbucks coffees for that kind of money. Maybe even four.
______________
*it would be really ugly if I built it!