• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Wharfedale adds larger Dovedale to Heritage line

Galliardist

Major Contributor
Joined
Jun 26, 2021
Messages
2,558
Likes
3,277
Location
Sydney. NSW, Australia
Denton 85, Linton 85, Dovedale ... all the same tweeter, but differently tuned. Denton 85 has elevated HF above 10K. I wonder how the treble of the Dovedale compares to the Linton, which has a fairly linear response. The is a serious lack of reviews and measurements.
What Hi Fi have given them four stars


Trust this about as far as you could throw a vanful of these speakers though...
 

Jim Creek

Active Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2023
Messages
104
Likes
141
The Wharfedale tweeter in this series is closer to the tweeters of the 1970s. That is whole point to this series, Denton, Linton, Dovedale. They are throwbacks to the old days when the sound characteristic for Wharfedale resembled the ‘Eastcoast Sound’. That characteristic was a subdued high-end.

AR, Advent, KLH and others were examples of the Eastcoast Sound.
 

BrokenEnglishGuy

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 19, 2020
Messages
1,936
Likes
1,158
What Hi Fi have given them four stars


Trust this about as far as you could throw a vanful of these speakers though...
If you want a 5 ⭐️ speakers
You need the elysian line
Pretty solid and nice speakers for good money

But its pretty big, kind of sad
 

AC1

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2021
Messages
34
Likes
29
The Wharfedale tweeter in this series is closer to the tweeters of the 1970s. That is whole point to this series, Denton, Linton, Dovedale. They are throwbacks to the old days when the sound characteristic for Wharfedale resembled the ‘Eastcoast Sound’. That characteristic was a subdued high-end.

AR, Advent, KLH and others were examples of the Eastcoast Sound.

Depends on how they are tuned. Linton is non-fatiguing (because it measures pretty much flat). Denton 85 is fatiguing (because of raised treble). The question is what did Peter Comeau do with the Dovedale? Flat or raised?
 

VintageFlanker

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
4,995
Likes
20,091
Location
Paris
1000029131.jpg

Measurements by @John Atkinson for Stereophile :
1000029132.jpg

 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,903
Likes
16,917
View attachment 360123
Measurements by @John Atkinson for Stereophile :
View attachment 360124
Very nice, quite flat and with smooth directivity, if I would nitpick only the little 3-7 kHz bump in his in room response resulting from the wide radiation there:
0424-Whardovefig6-600.jpg

Interestingly I have a similar in on my Diamonds 12.1 which funnily wasn't designed by Comeau but Fink that I don't like but that may be my taste and room.

As far as I remember you also ordered at the same time a pair with me, would be very interested in your listening experience.
 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,903
Likes
16,917
I just read also the corresponding review text from JA and he seems to confirm that:

"While the Dovedale's mid-treble could sound a little too forward with some recordings"

"However, both the demanding impedance and the slight excess of presence-energy in the in-room balance will make amplifier choice critical in getting the best from this speaker."
 
Last edited:

Penelinfi

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2021
Messages
453
Likes
341
That bass bump looks slightly bigger than what's normally from their measurement technique, maybe a couple of dB?
 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,903
Likes
16,917
That bass bump looks slightly bigger than what's normally from their measurement technique, maybe a couple of dB?
I think it depends also on the radiating surfaces so I don't think its clear to say.
 

ahofer

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 3, 2019
Messages
5,045
Likes
9,152
Location
New York City
Directivity and decay measurements don’t look that great.
 
OP
C

cavedriver

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 10, 2020
Messages
711
Likes
800
Location
Maryland, USA
That bass bump looks slightly bigger than what's normally from their measurement technique, maybe a couple of dB?
Doesn't JA still eyeball the level on the near field bass measurements or did he adopt a repeatable method that could be traced back to an anechoic reference? I can't remember and I often read old reviews on Stereophile when he had less capable instrumentation. Without a good reference to match to, the bass levels in all the stereophile reviews could easily be off by several dB if not more, and when you mix in room response it gets even harder to say too much about it from their reviews. Good enough for an approximation though to weed out the crappy speakers and justify a first-hand listen.
 

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,410
Likes
4,565
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK
Stereophile's bass measurements are usually well off by at least 3db I think at 100 - 200Hz. Speakers which come out flat in the bass to mid-range in their testing are usually bass-light by a good margin I think.

These Dovedales are I suspect retro for the sake of it, but I don't know really, even after all this time. I mean, the similarly priced (in the UK) Harbeth SHL5+XD's ancestor in 1977 was also designed with a slightly wider and fractionally slightly lower look to separate it from the competing BC1/LS3/6/Studio One cosmetic but again, no idea how this would affect directivity and the current XD model is very close indeed to the original model dimensions I remember.
 
Top Bottom