• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

WAF friendly, cost effective acoustic absorption panels

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,364
Location
Netherlands
So my room is quite reverberant, with a ceramic tiled floor (carpet in front of speakers) and plastered brick walls. The only plus side is the relatively high ceiling at 280 cm, as well as the fact that it's wood and plaster (90 years old original).

I did a few simulations using REW of the room (it doesn't do L-shapes.. but close enough) and found that my right sidewall and the rear wall would be best suited for some acoustic absorption panels. I thought about DIY'ing a few, but my time is a bit limited, and they should look quite nice. Also, I'm not good with fabrics ;)

So some commercial product needs to come in and save the day once again. Sadly, as soon as the word "acoustic" is mentioned, prices go up quite a bit.

So this is the room:
floorplan.png

The round green thing is an open spiral staircase.

I'd like to cover about 1.5 to 2 m^2 per wall. The only thing that I found that has an acceptable budget, is these things:

515i7Hm8JvL._AC_SX679_.jpg

Available in various colours and sizes. I'd be interested in the 100x50x11 cm version. They also have some performance stats, which a lot's of other more expensive products often miss:

51SPmH2jMiL._AC_SX679_.jpg


Sadly, no Amazon reviews yet. The question is: what other options are available with a decent price and availability in the EU?

Oh, and I want the things to work quite low down, so sub 150Hz would be very welcome :)
 
Last edited:

Bamboszek

Active Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2018
Messages
181
Likes
307
I'm not sure if they offer shipping to different countries, but you may try asking them.
Bought a couple of them a few months ago and I'm more than happy. It's local manufacturer about 60km from my place. Really well made, Isover PT80 wool inside and price for 120x60x10cm panel is two times lower than one from your link.
Site is in polish, but google translate should help.
Absorbery akustyczne - Ścienne i sufitowe - Atrakcyjne ceny (akustonic.com)
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,364
Location
Netherlands
I'm not sure if they offer shipping to different countries, but you may try asking them.
Bought a couple of them a few months ago and I'm more than happy. It's local manufacturer about 60km from my place. Really well made, Isover PT80 wool inside and price for 120x60x10cm panel is two times lower than one from your link.
Site is in polish, but google translate should help.
Absorbery akustyczne - Ścienne i sufitowe - Atrakcyjne ceny (akustonic.com)

Looking good. The Amazon product is also made in Poland. I'll ask them about shipping.
 

FeddyLost

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
May 24, 2020
Messages
752
Likes
543
sub 150Hz would be very welcome
Sub 150 effectiveness will be either much deeper of few times expensive.
Mineral wool without membrane don't work well below 200 Hz unless you have sophisticated layered combo of 25-30 cm deep.
 

Zoomer

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
323
Likes
469
Sub 150Hz absorption is a very different beast from absorption to remedy reverb and flutter echo.
With room treatment I would focus on the last and use room EQ for the low-end (can be very cost-effective).
Although, you'd make a lot of friends here if you could come up with WAF friendly bass-traps...;) Needs mass and volume, no way around that.
 
Last edited:
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,364
Location
Netherlands
Well, it doesn't need to go very deep sub 150. I know that it gets tricky down there. But take the graph in my first post as a reference. Even the other Polish company (the one @Bamboszek posted) provides quite good performance if you can believe it.
 

Weeb Labs

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Messages
607
Likes
1,423
Location
Ireland
For optimal WAF, you need to DIY the panel and order custom fabric prints to make them resemble pretty posters or picture frames. ;)
 

AurekV

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
33
Likes
32
I seriously doubt that any reasonably thick velocity absorber will help you much with response at the frequencies that REW's room simulator works at. If you're looking to reduce reflections above 250 Hz then absolutely velocity absorbers will work. Though, I'm not sure what you have indicated will be enough of them.
 
Last edited:

AurekV

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
33
Likes
32
I don't believe this graph makes sense for a 11 cm panel mounted to a wall. When looking at absorption measurements, methodology is everything. This panel was probably mounted across a corner for that mesurement, providing way better LF absorption due to the large air gap.
 
Last edited:

Hipper

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jun 16, 2019
Messages
753
Likes
625
Location
Herts., England
GIK Acoustics?
https://gikacoustics.eu/product-category/acoustic-panels-6/

The Impression series has nice looking front plate options. And the regular absorption panels have a ton of color options as well.

For optimal WAF, you need to DIY the panel and order custom fabric prints to make them resemble pretty posters or picture frames. ;)

In fact GIK can make 'Art Panels':

Acoustic Art Panels - GIK Acoustics - Sound Absorbing Wall Art

I've bought from GIK (not Art Panels) a few times and found them helpful. You can get free advice from them too. They also have a forum where you can ask anything:

https://www.audiocircle.com/index.php?board=183.0
 

Weeb Labs

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
Messages
607
Likes
1,423
Location
Ireland
Ooh, that's fun. Although they are charging EUR 183 (ex. VAT) for a single 120x60 panel.
 

Hipper

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jun 16, 2019
Messages
753
Likes
625
Location
Herts., England
Interesting video - thanks.

My take is that, for a given space, and any amount of money/material, you are still better off using the full amount of material to fill that space rather then half the material plus air gap.
 

AurekV

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2020
Messages
33
Likes
32
Interesting video - thanks.

My take is that, for a given space, and any amount of money/material, you are still better off using the full amount of material to fill that space rather then half the material plus air gap.
For maximum performance yep, but for store bought treatments especially an air gap can be much more cost effective and some people prefer the look.
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,364
Location
Netherlands
some people prefer the look.

In was thinking along the same lines. Having something stand off the wall a bit might look quite nice. You could even mount some lights behind it for added effect.

Great resources guys! Really loving it :cool:
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,364
Location
Netherlands
Well, a bit of bass absorption is more of a plus. Higher frequency absorption is still highest priority. Those things don’t seem to be cheap either.
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,364
Location
Netherlands
Could cover them in felt.

Would a thin layer of felt make those work significantly better above 500 Hz? It won’t make it any cheaper though :(. A felt cover would make for a nice finish though!
 
Top Bottom